william-james88 wrote:ZeroWolf wrote:Rid (or car robots) actually had more combiners than you're remembering in the form of the train team that formed rail racer (three man team full parts integration) and the land fill team (four members, full parts integration. ..I think)
Oh and will, in animated, the combiner was called Safe Guard who only a few liked (like me who digged his symmetrical docking like combination) he wasn't perfect, but I had fun with him.
That train is cool, I was glad to finally get him, though the fact that they accomplish to have 3 bullet trains actually turn into individual robots which in turn can combine into a bigger robot is better than the actual end result. One of the parts ends up beign a back pack, just like those samurai combiners from Transformers Go!
And to those asking, I wouldnt count 2 part combiners in a list. There are so many, I might as well just do a list of 2 part combiners. But they come up in other lists anyway already, like best Optimus Super Modes, which is all about him teaming up with other bots.
I will show you what my dilemma is when we look beyond G1. As you may have noticed, I really like when a list goes through a buch of different eras and designs (which even the G1 combiner list does) and that is still honest and true. It shows how certain toys still hold up. But if we look at combiners, they are all evaluated on that combining technology. If a combiner technology is better than the rest, then why not include all combiners that use it or exclude all those that dont.
For instance, think of the best version of Superion and Devastator since G1. Are both from the same line? If so, then whats the use of naming other more subpar combiners? Thats what I am struggling with.
In the end, I feel it will be easier to eventually dolists of top 5 toys in a specific line and we can then see where the combiners end up within (hint hint, the energon combiner teams are not top 5 in the Energon line and movie Devastator is not top 5 in best toys from ROTF).
Thanks for helping me out guys, it means a lot.
I do see your point. By the evolving nature of the brand, the methods of combining are (generally) always improving to add more versatility and flexibility. Plus they keep upping their game in terms of size and how many can go into bigger bots while being stable, so by definition the best combiners are the latest editions.
Nostalgia and fondness for the old toys aside, it would be laughable to put G1 Devastator on the same list as CW Superior, save for it a pity mention of it's "important place" in the legacy.