Transformers Movie Rated by the MPAA?
Posted by magnusupreme Fri Mar 09, 2007 12:06 pm
- magnusupreme
- Fuzor
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 4:52 pm
- Location: UK
Posted by Quaternion Fri Mar 09, 2007 12:25 pm
- Quaternion
- Fuzor
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 10:22 pm
- Strength: 2
- Intelligence: 10
- Rank: 8
- Courage: 9
- Skill: 10
Posted by Philcom Fri Mar 09, 2007 12:27 pm
Are they complete idiots? Do they want kids to be able to see the movie at all. Dispite on how awesome some 20 something fans might think it is that things in the movie are so intense that the first cut was rated R, like it or not, the success of this movie will depend largely on kids watching the movie as well, and toy sales that will be generated afterwards.
This is quite possibly the biggest proof that Bay is going in his own direction here, Hasbro would have never had allowed a rated R movie for Transformers, but he's made one. You can say that many PG-13 movie are rated R in the first cut, but there's no way Transformers should have been on the line like this. They literally have to have the robots tear apart humans with their hands, drop the f bomb, or have some girl flashing the camera to do do so. The MPAA wouln't rate a movie R if it just featured robots kicking the crap out of each other.
So unless Shia has no idea about what he's talking about... again, the people responsible for this movie pretty much crossed the line as far as I'm concerned. The simple reason why: If kids aren't allowed to see the movie, it'll flop, big time. Yes, the second cut is PG-13 now, but will we have a directors cut that's rated R now? Stupid.
- Philcom
- Fuzor
- Posts: 243
- News Credits: 2
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2001 9:17 am
Posted by Milanion Fri Mar 09, 2007 12:30 pm
Philcom wrote:Yes, the second cut is PG-13 now, but will we have a directors cut that's rated R now? Stupid.
That sounds fine with me.
- Milanion
- Combiner
- Posts: 491
- News Credits: 4
- Joined: Thu May 25, 2006 8:35 am
Posted by Nemesis_Apoc Fri Mar 09, 2007 12:44 pm
- Nemesis_Apoc
- Guardian Of Seibertron
- Posts: 6486
- Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2006 2:43 pm
Posted by Casual Matt Fri Mar 09, 2007 12:49 pm
- Casual Matt
- Mini-Con
- Posts: 27
- News Credits: 173
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2003 7:49 am
- Location: Newfoundland, Canada
Posted by First-Aid Fri Mar 09, 2007 1:00 pm
-Kanrabat- wrote:TF-fan kev777 wrote:First-Aid wrote:Okay, did anyone else notice that we all get a wonderful shot of Starscreams crotch anytime he sits in that throne? That's unnerving. Couldn't they have put n extra flap in there? It's....weird.
Its kind of like Basic Instinct, but not in a good way...
Goddammit, now I can't unsee it.
- First-Aid
- Faction Commander
- Posts: 4750
- News Credits: 2
- Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 7:54 am
- Location: A lone Bears household in CHeeseheadland...
- Strength: 3
- Intelligence: 10
- Speed: 7
- Endurance: 5
- Rank: 6
- Courage: 10
- Firepower: 2
- Skill: 10+
Posted by Robinson Fri Mar 09, 2007 1:26 pm
- Robinson
- Gestalt
- Posts: 2578
- News Credits: 11
- Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 11:59 pm
Posted by Autobot032 Fri Mar 09, 2007 1:29 pm
I also hope that there is no F-word type language.
This is TransFormers, not Alien(s), and it shouldn't be.
It's not meant to be graphic, gory, over the top.
It's supposed to be entertaining, and fun. If your idea of those two involves heavy amounts of sex, foul language, and extreme graphic violence, well boo hoo. He's not catering this to you, or anyone else. Deal with it.
"R" rated TFs....come on...get real.
- Autobot032
- Matrix Keeper
- Posts: 9051
- News Credits: 668
- Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 4:51 am
- Location: I don't know!
Posted by Robinson Fri Mar 09, 2007 2:16 pm
- Robinson
- Gestalt
- Posts: 2578
- News Credits: 11
- Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 11:59 pm
Posted by Seibertron Fri Mar 09, 2007 3:29 pm
-

Seibertron - Site Owner
- Posts: 14052
- News Credits: 3649
- Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2001 6:17 pm
- Location: Mount Prospect, IL USA
- Alt Mode: Supersonic Cybertronian Jet
- Strength: 10
- Intelligence: 9
- Speed: 7
- Endurance: 9
- Rank: 10+
- Courage: 8
- Firepower: 5
- Skill: 10+
Posted by Robinson Fri Mar 09, 2007 4:40 pm
- Robinson
- Gestalt
- Posts: 2578
- News Credits: 11
- Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 11:59 pm
Posted by Robinson Fri Mar 09, 2007 5:04 pm
- Robinson
- Gestalt
- Posts: 2578
- News Credits: 11
- Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 11:59 pm
Posted by Barricade Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:31 pm
-

Barricade - Godmaster
- Posts: 1662
- News Credits: 3
- Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 6:17 pm
- Location: Ramstein AB, Germany
- Strength: 8
- Intelligence: 10+
- Speed: 9
- Endurance: 10+
- Rank: 3
- Courage: 9
- Firepower: 10
- Skill: 9
Posted by i_amtrunks Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:45 pm
There is no way that a film tentatively rated "R" would be bumped down to a "PG" because an Executive Producer "put it in context"
If films like Harry Potter couldnt get an "M" rating bumped down to a "PG" then theres no way this could happen.
Also I thought the film wasnt finished, so how could the MPAA see it? If the MPAA is like their British and Australian counterparts, they would not be bale to rate a film until they see the finalised version that is to be released.
-

i_amtrunks - Guardian Of Seibertron
- Posts: 6755
- News Credits: 972
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2006 5:31 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia
Posted by Barricade Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:52 pm
well it IS STEPHEN FRICKEN SPIELBERG WE ARE TALKING ABOUT HEREi_amtrunks wrote:What a load of crap.
There is no way that a film tentatively rated "R" would be bumped down to a "PG" because an Executive Producer "put it in context"
If films like Harry Potter couldnt get an "M" rating bumped down to a "PG" then theres no way this could happen.
Also I thought the film wasnt finished, so how could the MPAA see it? If the MPAA is like their British and Australian counterparts, they would not be bale to rate a film until they see the finalised version that is to be released.
-

Barricade - Godmaster
- Posts: 1662
- News Credits: 3
- Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 6:17 pm
- Location: Ramstein AB, Germany
- Strength: 8
- Intelligence: 10+
- Speed: 9
- Endurance: 10+
- Rank: 3
- Courage: 9
- Firepower: 10
- Skill: 9
- Ninja Sixshot
- Matrix Keeper
- Posts: 7522
- News Credits: 1
- Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 10:32 pm
- Location: in the zoo, running it
Posted by tequila stu Sat Mar 10, 2007 12:14 am
Autobot032 wrote:I'd surely hope it wasn't even close to a "R" rating.
I also hope that there is no F-word type language.
This is TransFormers, not Alien(s), and it shouldn't be.
It's not meant to be graphic, gory, over the top.
It's supposed to be entertaining, and fun. If your idea of those two involves heavy amounts of sex, foul language, and extreme graphic violence, well boo hoo. He's not catering this to you, or anyone else. Deal with it.
"R" rated TFs....come on...get real.
precisely why it should be "R" rated.
i very much doubt that someone being chased, shot at is going to shout out. 'oh bother', or 'sugar' or 'Jings!'
they are more likely to shout out 'holy "F bomb" i dont want to die' or 'what the "F bomb" is that' or other equally awesome examples of dropping the f bomb.......
and they may say its a kiddies film, but to be fair, if it was, they would have been better off going to Disney, Pixar etc rather than the route of action film summer blockbuster.
- tequila stu
- Pretender
- Posts: 728
- Joined: Thu Feb 24, 2005 10:36 am
Posted by Basketball Jones Sat Mar 10, 2007 12:24 am
If Bay included profanity to raise the rating, he'd be keeping with one G1 tradition, at least.
Of course, in the United States, a synonym for feces was judged to be more damaging to children than watching their animated heroes get shot and killed by gunfire in movie theaters.
- Basketball Jones
- Combiner
- Posts: 417
- News Credits: 2
- Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 10:01 pm
Posted by Stormrider Sat Mar 10, 2007 3:29 am
i_amtrunks wrote:What a load of crap.
There is no way that a film tentatively rated "R" would be bumped down to a "PG" because an Executive Producer "put it in context"
If films like Harry Potter couldnt get an "M" rating bumped down to a "PG" then theres no way this could happen.
Also I thought the film wasnt finished, so how could the MPAA see it? If the MPAA is like their British and Australian counterparts, they would not be bale to rate a film until they see the finalised version that is to be released.
I'm not familiar with "M". Where does that fall in terms of PG, PG-13, and R?
- Stormrider
- Guardian Of Seibertron
- Posts: 6043
- News Credits: 409
- Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 6:24 am
- Location: USA
Posted by Elita One Sat Mar 10, 2007 5:10 am
Gutsman Heavy wrote:That'll be an M for Australians then
But the local distribtors will appeal OFLC to get PG rating anyway. But a M rating doesn't stop the little ones seeing it, when I saw Star Wars Ep3 and the LOTR movies there were quite a few kids in the cinema watching. I see the MPAA R rating as a good thing, shows you can take a licence that's for young ones and give a maturity to it.
I'm not familiar with "M". Where does that fall in terms of PG, PG-13, and R?
Depending on the film, it can be between PG-13 and R. Hope this helps.
http://www.****.tumblr.com
-

Elita One - Headmaster Jr
- Posts: 563
- News Credits: 1
- Joined: Sun Jul 04, 2004 6:07 am
- Location: Australia
Who is online
Registered users: Apple [Bot], Bing [Bot], Bumblevivisector, ChatGPT [Bot], Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], MSN [Bot], OpenAI [Bot], Overcracker, Psycho Warrior, Transbot, Yahoo [Bot], Yandex [Bot]


