Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store
Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
00Stargrave00 wrote:I’m not as hardcore into the Studio Series is there an expected numbered amount with gaps we’re guessing at or are you just thinking some fun speculation? Because if that’s the case I want a cool Galvatron out of this line seriously dude I would love to see how they pull that off. I’ve been impressed so far with the few I have I mean I feel like they look and feel like they cost a lot more than they are. The engineering and complexity is just stellar. Just my experience so far - no duds yet.
ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:Stinger at least had some car bits visible. Galvatron is a complete cheater, and frankly I don't see a Studio Series Voyager being much less of a shellformer than the AoE Voyager.
I think what we need to see in the Studio Series this year is a screen-colors redeco of the HFTD retool of the ROTF Voyager-class Fallen, to go with the ROTF 10th anniversary.
In other words, he'd have to transform like MP Dinobot.ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:00Stargrave00 wrote:I’m not as hardcore into the Studio Series is there an expected numbered amount with gaps we’re guessing at or are you just thinking some fun speculation? Because if that’s the case I want a cool Galvatron out of this line seriously dude I would love to see how they pull that off. I’ve been impressed so far with the few I have I mean I feel like they look and feel like they cost a lot more than they are. The engineering and complexity is just stellar. Just my experience so far - no duds yet.
Meh, the engineering in Studio Series is no more advanced than the best seen in other movie lines. And it's not al;ways up to par. But even with the best engineering, a "cool Galvatron" in impossible. ANY toy of him with a remotely accurate robot mode is fated to end up a shellformer.
Because AoE Galvatron is a completely untransformable design.He's a filthy cheating garbage abomination that magically morphs from a tweaked version of Megs' Movie 1 robot mode into an Earthly semi truck.
![]()
He is filth, the person who designed him should be flogged, the useless smegheads who approved the design should be doubly flogged, and his design should be left to rot in the vault of shame forever.
The only way he could possibly be pulled off without heavy shellforming (or maaaaybe stupidly fiddly inversion shenanigans, and even then...) is by doing him as one of those dolls that you transform by turning inside out. Trying to do a transfort
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Sabrblade wrote:In other words, he'd have to transform like MP Dinobot.ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:00Stargrave00 wrote:I’m not as hardcore into the Studio Series is there an expected numbered amount with gaps we’re guessing at or are you just thinking some fun speculation? Because if that’s the case I want a cool Galvatron out of this line seriously dude I would love to see how they pull that off. I’ve been impressed so far with the few I have I mean I feel like they look and feel like they cost a lot more than they are. The engineering and complexity is just stellar. Just my experience so far - no duds yet.
Meh, the engineering in Studio Series is no more advanced than the best seen in other movie lines. And it's not al;ways up to par. But even with the best engineering, a "cool Galvatron" in impossible. ANY toy of him with a remotely accurate robot mode is fated to end up a shellformer.
Because AoE Galvatron is a completely untransformable design.He's a filthy cheating garbage abomination that magically morphs from a tweaked version of Megs' Movie 1 robot mode into an Earthly semi truck.
![]()
He is filth, the person who designed him should be flogged, the useless smegheads who approved the design should be doubly flogged, and his design should be left to rot in the vault of shame forever.
The only way he could possibly be pulled off without heavy shellforming (or maaaaybe stupidly fiddly inversion shenanigans, and even then...) is by doing him as one of those dolls that you transform by turning inside out. Trying to do a transfort
Nathaniel Prime wrote:ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:Stinger at least had some car bits visible. Galvatron is a complete cheater, and frankly I don't see a Studio Series Voyager being much less of a shellformer than the AoE Voyager.
I think what we need to see in the Studio Series this year is a screen-colors redeco of the HFTD retool of the ROTF Voyager-class Fallen, to go with the ROTF 10th anniversary.
I can easily see SS Galvatron having the same engineering as Evasion Mode OP. Just the truck mode flipping inside out, hiding the vehicle mode parts and revealing the robot mode parts. Legs could either be like Evasion mode OP as well, or it could be like Galvy's AOE Voyager.
Nathaniel Prime wrote:I want the Fallen to be a new mold with great articulation (ab crunch, ankle tilts, etc...), really accurate, and maybe the same "jet" mode from before. He never really transformed in the movie, and I really like the ROTF toy's jet mode, so that could be a thing. Also needs to have his staff and the Matrix (removable face is welcome too)
ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:How tall would that be relative to SS Jetpower Optimus Prime and Voyager Megs, though?
ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:He was, although not as huge as originally planned. He's about the same height as Optimus is with the Jetpower leg extensions, that much I know by hart. I was thinking the ROTF/HFTD Voyager might be big enough next to the Studio Series figs since it's a pre-2011 Voyager mold. But I can't determine that for sure myself.
ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:TlDr; AoE Galvatron...
ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:The particle-cloud transformation pissed me off soooo much. I was so glad it didn't return in TLK. I imagine if it had, HasTak's toy designers would have murdered the films' art department.
The thing about Lockdown is that he at least has some car bits to his robot mode, and a width in line with a sports car. But Galvatron... Galvatron is complete BS. And I think he's impossible to pull off without shellforming even at a larger scale. But even if he somehow [i[is[/i] possible, I think the BS level means he doesn't deserve the effort anyway.
-Kanrabat- wrote:ZeldaTheSwordsman wrote:The particle-cloud transformation pissed me off soooo much. I was so glad it didn't return in TLK. I imagine if it had, HasTak's toy designers would have murdered the films' art department.
The thing about Lockdown is that he at least has some car bits to his robot mode, and a width in line with a sports car. But Galvatron... Galvatron is complete BS. And I think he's impossible to pull off without shellforming even at a larger scale. But even if he somehow [i[is[/i] possible, I think the BS level means he doesn't deserve the effort anyway.
Particle transformation was indeed complete LAZINESS. Sure, animating a complex transformation.is long and expensive, but I marveled each times when I saw it happen on screen. Then came AoE with it's extended middle finger...
As for Galvatron, it may still be possible to make a non shellforming transformation, but it would have to litterally turn inside-out with a 100 steps process.... Or is it? Because Knight Optimus is as much bullcrap as Galvatron, with no truck kibbles whatsoever. And tree 3P companies did a MP Knight Optimus. Unique Toy's being the best, of course. You could argue that Knight Optimus have truck kibbles in bot mode, but they are so fused with his "wet suit" body that it's as if he didn't have any.
-Kanrabat- wrote:I'm phoneposting so screw quote editing.
Effectively, Galvatron have abdolutely no clue of any véhicule on his bot. But know what? I have the PERFECT solution. Make Galvatron a PRETENDER with a truck shell! That Will be freaking awesome.
Return to Transformers Toys Discussion
Registered users: Alexa [Bot], Bing [Bot], Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], MSN [Bot], Yahoo [Bot]