Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store
![Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "STARSCREAM Transformers Classics Universe Deluxe complete Hasbro 2006 240427E"](https://www.seibertron.com/images/ebay/classics-universe/deluxe-class/starscream-240427E/t-DSC06490.jpg)
I couldn't agreed more. We really need something new, something different. They at least should let Galvatron win next round. Just to shock the audience and giving a lot of unexepected options for six and let's hope the final movie.Megatron Wolf wrote:If bay is involved at all its going to be another terrible paint by numbers movie for the mindless masses that lasts for way to long. If hasbro wasnt so greedy they'd take this time to try something different, the franchise is established & the mindless moron will go & see the new one no matter what. Perfect opportunity to experiment & try to win back all the fans youve alienated over the years. But all they care about is lining their pockets & they're to short sighted to see the bigger picture so things will never change.
TurboMMaster wrote:We really need something new, something different.
Michael Bay was a mistake since the very beggining. He didn't screw the first movie only because it was so simple in the first place. He tried to fix it in the fourth movie and he partially succed, but still he's will to correct everything costs us two movies witch are completly unwatchable and unworthy of beign considered canon - that five real life years of Universe growing completly wasted. In this time, Marvel Cinematic Universe with very similiar main targets was estabilished as a interesting and large Universe - and none of this movies had some ambitious script with cunning plot. I think that all he needed to do is let writers do their work.zatara1701 wrote:That being said... Bay is adequate, but I would love to see someone else out there take a swing at it. You cannot tell me there is not a director out there that loves the Transformers like Joss Whedon loves Marvel and JJ Abrams loves Star Wars....
Burn wrote:Don't. Just don't even attempt to compare Transformer movies to the Marvel Cinematic Universe.
MCU is in a league of its own. It has decades of history to draw from, it also has a number of different directors and writers. They have the guiding hand of a Marvel Executive who makes sure things tie together but are independent enough to stand alone.
TFCU is just a series of movies following each other.
You can NOT compare them.
Fires_Of_Inferno wrote:Then I would suggest that Hasbro/Paramount reboot the Transformers movie franchise so they can get it rolling in the right direction. It's inconceivable to even consider them as being on the same level as the MCU as they are, and yet, Paramount wants a TFCU like the MCU. Can't very well do that now.
Burn wrote:Fires_Of_Inferno wrote:Then I would suggest that Hasbro/Paramount reboot the Transformers movie franchise so they can get it rolling in the right direction. It's inconceivable to even consider them as being on the same level as the MCU as they are, and yet, Paramount wants a TFCU like the MCU. Can't very well do that now.
Why can't they?
Acutally, why not? The same main target audience, the same kind of a movie (summer blockbuster). I tell more: If MCU is able to spawn a new enjoyable blockbuster each few months, it proves that action movie can be a not so bad movie. For example: Both First Thor and Captain America were nothing more but 2-hour Avengers trailers, yet both were much better when compared to DOTM, witch in theory was much ambitious.Burn wrote:Don't. Just don't even attempt to compare Transformer movies to the Marvel Cinematic Universe.
MCU is in a league of its own. It has decades of history to draw from, it also has a number of different directors and writers. They have the guiding hand of a Marvel Executive who makes sure things tie together but are independent enough to stand alone.
TFCU is just a series of movies following each other.
You can NOT compare them.
TurboMMaster wrote:Acutally, why not? The same main target audience, the same kind of a movie (summer blockbuster). I tell more: If MCU is able to spawn a new enjoyable blockbuster each few months, it proves that action movie can be a not so bad movie. For example: Both First Thor and Captain America were nothing more but 2-hour Avengers trailers, yet both were much better when compared to DOTM, witch in theory was much ambitious.Burn wrote:Don't. Just don't even attempt to compare Transformer movies to the Marvel Cinematic Universe.
MCU is in a league of its own. It has decades of history to draw from, it also has a number of different directors and writers. They have the guiding hand of a Marvel Executive who makes sure things tie together but are independent enough to stand alone.
TFCU is just a series of movies following each other.
You can NOT compare them.
SKYWARPED_128 wrote:Too afraid to change the formula. They know the Bayverse movies won't remain a profitable formula forever, which is why they're playing around with the TFCU idea, but they're still not sure when to stop. AoE still made money, courtesy of China.
Also, there's no guarantee that the TFCU thing will perform better or even as well as the Bay-style flicks. My guess is, they'll try to maintain the status quo for as long as possible, until it finally bombs at the cinema.
Burn wrote:So you have inside knowledge of Paramount executives? (Because that's how you're sounding).
Burn wrote:Fires_Of_Inferno wrote:Then I would suggest that Hasbro/Paramount reboot the Transformers movie franchise so they can get it rolling in the right direction. It's inconceivable to even consider them as being on the same level as the MCU as they are, and yet, Paramount wants a TFCU like the MCU. Can't very well do that now.
Why can't they?
Burn wrote:Don't. Just don't even attempt to compare Transformer movies to the Marvel Cinematic Universe.
MCU is in a league of its own. It has decades of history to draw from, it also has a number of different directors and writers. They have the guiding hand of a Marvel Executive who makes sure things tie together but are independent enough to stand alone.
TFCU is just a series of movies following each other.
You can NOT compare them.
Burn wrote:I just think the idea of spin-offs is stupid and they'll just come off looking like unoriginal copy cats. It works for MCU because of the reasons I listed above, TF's don't have that luxury.
Burn wrote:Don't. Just don't even attempt to compare Transformer movies to the Marvel Cinematic Universe.
The Transformers is in a league of its own. It has decades of history to draw from, it also has a number of different directors and writers. They have the guiding hand of a Hasbro Executive who makes sure things tie together but are independent enough to stand alone.
TFCU is just a series of movies following each other.
You can NOT compare them.
G1COLLECTOR wrote:I want someone else other than Michael Bay .
I think the Transformers movies are getting worse as they go. I own the first 3 on DVD, but yet to buy the 4th.
Also, no Mark Walburg please. He was as good as he could be for the 4th movie.
How about a movie that shows the story fully of what happened on Cybertron before part one in full details?? We would see all the bots in Cybertron modes
SlyTF1 wrote:Am I the only one hoping TF5 will be called Faces of Darkness? It just seems like the most fitting thing to do.
IF the villains are indeed the Quintessons (which isn't for certain) then it would be a neat title. However, non-fans, or maybe even newer fans, wouldn't get it, unless the Quintessons actually had 5 faces.SlyTF1 wrote:Am I the only one hoping TF5 will be called Faces of Darkness? It just seems like the most fitting thing to do.
Rodimus Prime wrote:IF the villains are indeed the Quintessons (which isn't for certain) then it would be a neat title. However, non-fans, or maybe even newer fans, wouldn't get it, unless the Quintessons actually had 5 faces.SlyTF1 wrote:Am I the only one hoping TF5 will be called Faces of Darkness? It just seems like the most fitting thing to do.
SlyTF1 wrote:Rodimus Prime wrote:IF the villains are indeed the Quintessons (which isn't for certain) then it would be a neat title. However, non-fans, or maybe even newer fans, wouldn't get it, unless the Quintessons actually had 5 faces.SlyTF1 wrote:Am I the only one hoping TF5 will be called Faces of Darkness? It just seems like the most fitting thing to do.
That's why I left out the number in the title.
Return to Transformers Live Action Film Forum
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], MSN [Bot], Sabrblade