Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store














Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
Randomhero wrote:Michael bay didn't sneak in 200 cast and crew and shoot what they needed before security chased them off the property. They have permission and if the owners and everyone affiliated with shooting there are okay with it than maybe people need to stop complaining.
Jeddostotle7 wrote:Randomhero wrote:Michael bay didn't sneak in 200 cast and crew and shoot what they needed before security chased them off the property. They have permission and if the owners and everyone affiliated with shooting there are okay with it than maybe people need to stop complaining.
Just because they had permission from the current owners of the castle doesn't mean the owners of the castle weren't making a mistake.
SlyTF1 wrote:I hate how people get mad about everything. Has this decision threatened the end of the world? No? Then get over it.
Randomhero wrote:Jeddostotle7 wrote:Randomhero wrote:Apollo-XL5 wrote:Kurona wrote:That doesn't really help. You don't get to just do something like this and then say "Oh no it's okay because I done this nice thing for him in exchange!!!"
There's absolutely no good reason to specifically use his home for this. None at all.
People are talking like Michael Bay is just doing what he wants, regardless of what others think. But he 'obviously' had permission from the owners (having told them what he planned to do).
Plus this isn't the first time that someone was making a film and used a famous building for a Nazi scene, causing an uproar from others.
But this film, like others in the past is a a 'work of fiction' and should be treated as such.
Talk about over-reaction.
THANK YOU!!!
exactly what I said yesterday. It's not all Michael bay,, its the producers, the studios, the country, and the owners of the house.
In order to shoot somewhere like that, the script is read multiple times over the span of weeks, has to be approved and there are consultants ON SET to make sure it's done right.
This the not the first move to shoot nazi locations in England. All the nazi scenes and locations like the nazi rally and the castles in indiana jones and the last crusade were all shot in England and at historical locations. That's were a lot of WWII stuff is shot not because it takes place in the U.K. but because it has that feeling(castles, historical looking buildings, etc.
People need to get off the offended train and if you say "I'm not offended, I'm just uncomfortable with this" or "I'm just not okay with this" news flash you just described being offended
You guys are missing the point of why people are getting mad. It's not that it's just any castle in England; it's that, for some unknown reason, they decided to specifically use Winston Churchill's home, A.K.A. one of the people who fought hardest against Hitler, as the place to turn into a Nazi castle. Not just any place, WINSTONE CHURCHILL's. You gotta be able to agree that that's at least in poor taste, right?
Michael bay didn't sneak in 200 cast and crew and shoot what they needed before security chased them off the property. They have permission and if the owners and everyone affiliated with shooting there are okay with it than maybe people need to stop complaining.
Seems like people getting mad is making yourself mad, yes? Well, their decision to get mad isn't threatening to end the world either, so by your own reasoning, you yourself must get over that.SlyTF1 wrote:I hate how people get mad about everything. Has this decision threatened the end of the world? No? Then get over it.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
budmaloney wrote:
I'm not hating, but Bay's actions speak for themselves.
Va'al wrote:Deadput wrote:Actually I don't know my mother's name is Valerie so is Va'al actually my mother?
Yes. Now go to your room and don't play with yourself.
Bronzewolf wrote:
Alright, alright. It's gettin' a bit too heated here. Please be repectful of the fact that everyone has a right to an opinion. Thanks!
Va'al wrote:Deadput wrote:Actually I don't know my mother's name is Valerie so is Va'al actually my mother?
Yes. Now go to your room and don't play with yourself.
Deadput wrote:Bronzewolf wrote:
Alright, alright. It's gettin' a bit too heated here. Please be repectful of the fact that everyone has a right to an opinion. Thanks!
Considering what kind of news this subject in everything is going to get heated.
What else was going to happen?
Bronzewolf wrote:Randomhero wrote:Jeddostotle7 wrote:Randomhero wrote:Apollo-XL5 wrote:Kurona wrote:That doesn't really help. You don't get to just do something like this and then say "Oh no it's okay because I done this nice thing for him in exchange!!!"
There's absolutely no good reason to specifically use his home for this. None at all.
People are talking like Michael Bay is just doing what he wants, regardless of what others think. But he 'obviously' had permission from the owners (having told them what he planned to do).
Plus this isn't the first time that someone was making a film and used a famous building for a Nazi scene, causing an uproar from others.
But this film, like others in the past is a a 'work of fiction' and should be treated as such.
Talk about over-reaction.
THANK YOU!!!
exactly what I said yesterday. It's not all Michael bay,, its the producers, the studios, the country, and the owners of the house.
In order to shoot somewhere like that, the script is read multiple times over the span of weeks, has to be approved and there are consultants ON SET to make sure it's done right.
This the not the first move to shoot nazi locations in England. All the nazi scenes and locations like the nazi rally and the castles in indiana jones and the last crusade were all shot in England and at historical locations. That's were a lot of WWII stuff is shot not because it takes place in the U.K. but because it has that feeling(castles, historical looking buildings, etc.
People need to get off the offended train and if you say "I'm not offended, I'm just uncomfortable with this" or "I'm just not okay with this" news flash you just described being offended
You guys are missing the point of why people are getting mad. It's not that it's just any castle in England; it's that, for some unknown reason, they decided to specifically use Winston Churchill's home, A.K.A. one of the people who fought hardest against Hitler, as the place to turn into a Nazi castle. Not just any place, WINSTONE CHURCHILL's. You gotta be able to agree that that's at least in poor taste, right?
Michael bay didn't sneak in 200 cast and crew and shoot what they needed before security chased them off the property. They have permission and if the owners and everyone affiliated with shooting there are okay with it than maybe people need to stop complaining.
Alright, alright. It's gettin' a bit too heated here. Please be repectful of the fact that everyone has a right to an opinion. Thanks!
Randomhero wrote:Bronzewolf wrote:Randomhero wrote:Jeddostotle7 wrote:Randomhero wrote:Apollo-XL5 wrote:Kurona wrote:That doesn't really help. You don't get to just do something like this and then say "Oh no it's okay because I done this nice thing for him in exchange!!!"
There's absolutely no good reason to specifically use his home for this. None at all.
People are talking like Michael Bay is just doing what he wants, regardless of what others think. But he 'obviously' had permission from the owners (having told them what he planned to do).
Plus this isn't the first time that someone was making a film and used a famous building for a Nazi scene, causing an uproar from others.
But this film, like others in the past is a a 'work of fiction' and should be treated as such.
Talk about over-reaction.
THANK YOU!!!
exactly what I said yesterday. It's not all Michael bay,, its the producers, the studios, the country, and the owners of the house.
In order to shoot somewhere like that, the script is read multiple times over the span of weeks, has to be approved and there are consultants ON SET to make sure it's done right.
This the not the first move to shoot nazi locations in England. All the nazi scenes and locations like the nazi rally and the castles in indiana jones and the last crusade were all shot in England and at historical locations. That's were a lot of WWII stuff is shot not because it takes place in the U.K. but because it has that feeling(castles, historical looking buildings, etc.
People need to get off the offended train and if you say "I'm not offended, I'm just uncomfortable with this" or "I'm just not okay with this" news flash you just described being offended
You guys are missing the point of why people are getting mad. It's not that it's just any castle in England; it's that, for some unknown reason, they decided to specifically use Winston Churchill's home, A.K.A. one of the people who fought hardest against Hitler, as the place to turn into a Nazi castle. Not just any place, WINSTONE CHURCHILL's. You gotta be able to agree that that's at least in poor taste, right?
Michael bay didn't sneak in 200 cast and crew and shoot what they needed before security chased them off the property. They have permission and if the owners and everyone affiliated with shooting there are okay with it than maybe people need to stop complaining.
Alright, alright. It's gettin' a bit too heated here. Please be repectful of the fact that everyone has a right to an opinion. Thanks!
Everyone also has the right to grow some common sense and think about the situation at hand before pointing fingers and yelling "poor tatste! Poor taste!" Before jumping to rediculous conclusions and throwing in their two cents,just think about what it takes to make a movie and shoot at certain locations.
Va'al wrote:Deadput wrote:Actually I don't know my mother's name is Valerie so is Va'al actually my mother?
Yes. Now go to your room and don't play with yourself.
Bronzewolf wrote:Randomhero wrote:Bronzewolf wrote:Randomhero wrote:Jeddostotle7 wrote:Randomhero wrote:Apollo-XL5 wrote:Kurona wrote:That doesn't really help. You don't get to just do something like this and then say "Oh no it's okay because I done this nice thing for him in exchange!!!"
There's absolutely no good reason to specifically use his home for this. None at all.
People are talking like Michael Bay is just doing what he wants, regardless of what others think. But he 'obviously' had permission from the owners (having told them what he planned to do).
Plus this isn't the first time that someone was making a film and used a famous building for a Nazi scene, causing an uproar from others.
But this film, like others in the past is a a 'work of fiction' and should be treated as such.
Talk about over-reaction.
THANK YOU!!!
exactly what I said yesterday. It's not all Michael bay,, its the producers, the studios, the country, and the owners of the house.
In order to shoot somewhere like that, the script is read multiple times over the span of weeks, has to be approved and there are consultants ON SET to make sure it's done right.
This the not the first move to shoot nazi locations in England. All the nazi scenes and locations like the nazi rally and the castles in indiana jones and the last crusade were all shot in England and at historical locations. That's were a lot of WWII stuff is shot not because it takes place in the U.K. but because it has that feeling(castles, historical looking buildings, etc.
People need to get off the offended train and if you say "I'm not offended, I'm just uncomfortable with this" or "I'm just not okay with this" news flash you just described being offended
You guys are missing the point of why people are getting mad. It's not that it's just any castle in England; it's that, for some unknown reason, they decided to specifically use Winston Churchill's home, A.K.A. one of the people who fought hardest against Hitler, as the place to turn into a Nazi castle. Not just any place, WINSTONE CHURCHILL's. You gotta be able to agree that that's at least in poor taste, right?
Michael bay didn't sneak in 200 cast and crew and shoot what they needed before security chased them off the property. They have permission and if the owners and everyone affiliated with shooting there are okay with it than maybe people need to stop complaining.
Alright, alright. It's gettin' a bit too heated here. Please be repectful of the fact that everyone has a right to an opinion. Thanks!
Everyone also has the right to grow some common sense and think about the situation at hand before pointing fingers and yelling "poor tatste! Poor taste!" Before jumping to rediculous conclusions and throwing in their two cents,just think about what it takes to make a movie and shoot at certain locations.
Okay enough! Second warning. Tone down the aggression, please.
Sabrblade wrote:Seems like people getting mad is making yourself mad, yes? Well, their decision to get mad isn't threatening to end the world either, so by your own reasoning, you yourself must get over that.SlyTF1 wrote:I hate how people get mad about everything. Has this decision threatened the end of the world? No? Then get over it.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
EunuchRon wrote:If Nazis had invaded England, they'd have totally done that. So... if the movie has Nazis invading England, then they'd have to show that, right? I mean, what would happen if that was real? I played a video game where Nazis invaded America and took over the white house. It had Nazi flags all over it, and you ended up having to shoot the president. It's all fiction! Too many people getting butthurt over fiction. Hey, maybe Churchill shoots the Nazis with a Tommy Gun and gets his house back in the flick. Wouldn't that be cool? I think he'd approve of that.
william-james88 wrote:If ever Sabrblade decides to go on vacation, I am glad to know we can rely on you.
Sabrblade wrote:Here's a different side of the story. Bay claims that Churchill is going to be a hero in this movie. This is our first confirmation that Winston Churchill is going to be a character in this movie, right? Well, who's going to play him?
I have one idea. We know that Anthony Hopkins is in this movie, but we don't know who he's playing. All we know is that his character, based on the video featuring him and Britain's Loneliest Dog, appears to be a British man dressed in old-timey clothing and owning a dog. Well, what if he's actually playing Churchill himself?
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Burn wrote:Please keep your comment respectful, and if you disagree with certain comments, do so in a respectful way.
... This NOT limited solely to members of Seibertron.com. Personal attacks/threats against non-members (e.g. Comic book Writers/Artists, Movie Producers/Stars/Directors, Toy Designers etc) will also not be tolerated.
Hellscream9999 wrote:EunuchRon wrote:If Nazis had invaded England, they'd have totally done that. So... if the movie has Nazis invading England, then they'd have to show that, right? I mean, what would happen if that was real? I played a video game where Nazis invaded America and took over the white house. It had Nazi flags all over it, and you ended up having to shoot the president. It's all fiction! Too many people getting butthurt over fiction. Hey, maybe Churchill shoots the Nazis with a Tommy Gun and gets his house back in the flick. Wouldn't that be cool? I think he'd approve of that.
Yeah, I'm seriously interested in seeing how this fits in with apparent time travel, merlin, king arthur, dinobots (maybe) and everything that's going on with o/p - this may be a case of a movie being either too cluttered, or needing to be over 3 hours to tell its story (which is easily possible, considering that aoe was pushing 3 hours and had much less going on in it)
Return to Transformers Live Action Film Forum
Registered users: Alexa [Bot], Bing [Bot], Bumblevivisector, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], megatran, MSN [Bot], Yahoo [Bot]