Roadbuster wrote:Aside everything past Lion King, save Hercules, there have been a few bad ones. This does not include Pixar's films.
Black Cauldron comes to mind. It originally had a run time of 8 hours but got cut down to 3, per Eisners orders. It was so bad there has been no Blu Ray release and I do not believe it was made available on VHS. It did come out on DVD. Had Disney's following film not been a critical success (Little Mermaid), likely animation in America would be dead, so not even the Simpsons would have seen the light of day.
JelZe GoldRabbit wrote:I'll be brief, yet stern:
any feature-length sequel to an animated feature-length animated movie
I'm sorry but I'm avoiding those like the plague. Not only are they just to milk the characters for what they're worth, they take away from the magic of the originals.
Roadbuster wrote:JelZe GoldRabbit wrote:I'll be brief, yet stern:
any feature-length sequel to an animated feature-length animated movie
I'm sorry but I'm avoiding those like the plague. Not only are they just to milk the characters for what they're worth, they take away from the magic of the originals.
Does that include Rescuers Down Under?
Silverwing wrote:Also, I feel compelled to give the obligatory:
One for each year of the Movieverse's decade strong tenure. Here's to a few more explosive years!
TulioDude wrote:Pocahontas 2.
manly for breaking the ship that has been established in the first film.
I liked both The Return of Jafar and The Lion King II: Simba's Pride. But otherwise, I agree.JelZe GoldRabbit wrote:I'll be brief, yet stern:
any feature-length sequel to an animated feature-length animated movie
I'm sorry but I'm avoiding those like the plague. Not only are they just to milk the characters for what they're worth, they take away from the magic of the originals.
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Yahoo [Bot]