Official Images: Transformers Beast Hunters Construct-Bots Elites Wave 1

Sunday, November 24th, 2013 12:01AM CST

Category: Toy News
Posted by: El Duque Views: 24,990

Topic Options: View Discussion · Sign in or Join to reply

This page may contain affiliate links. We may earn commissions when readers interact with or purchase items through these links. For more information, see our affiliate disclosures here.

Courtesy of Target.com we have have new official images of the upcoming Transformers Beast Hunters Construct-Bots Elites Optimus Prime, Shockwave, and Skystalker. Each retails for $14.99.

Credit(s): Target.com

News Search

Got Transformers News? Let us know here!

Most Recent Transformers News

Transformers #22, GI Joe #9, Void Rivals, Spawn, Toxic Avenger + more in-stock at Seibertron Store

Posted 11 hours ago

Re: Official Images: Transformers Beast Hunters Construct-Bots Elites Wave 1 (1531508)
Posted by Sabrblade on November 24th, 2013 @ 12:04am CST

I swear I honestly mistook that Skystalker for a Zoid at first glance when I saw him the little news post thumbnail.

Re: Official Images: Transformers Beast Hunters Construct-Bots Elites Wave 1 (1531523)
Posted by RhA on November 24th, 2013 @ 3:29am CST

I mistook him for Cryotech.

Re: Official Images: Transformers Beast Hunters Construct-Bots Elites Wave 1 (1531528)
Posted by Jelze Bunnycat on November 24th, 2013 @ 6:33am CST

I mistook Optimus Prime for Ultra Magnus!

Re: Official Images: Transformers Beast Hunters Construct-Bots Elites Wave 1 (1531549)
Posted by PrymeStriker on November 24th, 2013 @ 10:01am CST

Posted about these earlier

Skystalker looks awesome, though.

Re: Official Images: Transformers Beast Hunters Construct-Bots Elites Wave 1 (1531555)
Posted by Flashwave on November 24th, 2013 @ 12:07pm CST

Shockwave is interesting, and not really more a mess of parts than his voyager is.

Skystalker... reminds me more of the skeletal things Unicron rode into battle. If I had a Unicron, and maybe some spraypaint, I might do that. But I don't, so no.