Burn wrote:KorsO wrote:Galactic Prime wrote:KorsO wrote:Galactic Prime wrote:KorsO wrote:Galactic Prime wrote:
Yup, 100% EJ sucks, can't even stand looking at that ****. Don's Dreamwave stuff is amazing, his IDW stuff is amazing, until the Ongoing started and then he decided to go all Michael Bay **** style.
Lol.. Yup, then that's a 1000% solid Fact confirmation your visual judgement & preference Sucks balls buddy .
Damn lucky, Thank goodness these comic publishing houses doesn't have you or anyone similar deciding on the art direction..hehea .
Thank you for spending years of personal time & money on all of IDW comic runs btw
**Never imagined it was possible to come across someone worse & deluded than Bay.
I think the only ball sucking here, is done by you.
Look at this garbage
https://livioramondelli.deviantart.com/ ... -449056320
or this
https://guidoguidi.deviantart.com/art/T ... -416040063
or this
https://art.alphacoders.com/arts/view/71816
And that's just some of their worst offenders.
You're the one who clearly doesn't know what good art is
Lol, Unbelievable. Those are stellar variety of art styles. Livio's, very quirky stylized but has a cinematic charm to it. & Guido. Well GUido is Guido. Hit & misses. Good or bad, dude's a TF Hall of Famer. Plus he did mentioned hes championing the early TF Marvel comic styles. Heads up already given.
The only art that I am not a fan of is Wildman's. Even so, unlike you, Im not petty enough to call (or actually sincerely think) that its garbage. I just effortlessly avoid it.
No harm no foul. Done. Easy.
Still happy i bought the Mentzen, Flint & Livio Autocracy, Monstrocity & Primacy series.
Calling it garbage on a fan runned Tf board over and over and over and over sure is a Big boy Legit move there dreamwave boy.
If it bugs you so much to the point of whining & repeating your empty insults on these boards, why not go straight to the source?
Simon, James, Barber, Ej, Livio, Guido all have twitters buddy. And are constantly daily active as well.
The artists all have Intagram, Tumblr & Deviant art pages too. You can easily throw your 'Garbage' remarks there & have an immediate reply from the source authors.
Why not just do that Big boy? Too busy enjoying the self ball sucking too much?
I've actually told EJ Su what I think of his art thank you, and the unbelievable part here is that you think any of that is good. Welcome to the list of polished turds who like crappy art
Takes an Actual polished turd who likes crappy art to easily accuse another of being one buddy. Cheers.
This thing between you two ends now.
Gauntlet101010 wrote:Munkky wrote: I get the feeling from both this news and the War for Cybertron trilogy starting in 2019 that Hasbro was really shaken by The Last Knight flopping (I remember hearing that The Last Knight was supposed to be the start of a Hasbro Cinematic Universe), so they pulled the plug on everything that wasn't too far in production to cancel and ordered a complete blank-slate fresh start for the franchise in 2019, because the direction at the time wasn't working out.
I think so too. Although - talk about an overreaction. I don't think they really needed to reboot everything. Maybe just focus on what actually works and not try to shoehorn every single IP they own into a story that really didn't need it.
ZeroWolf wrote:What would you deem intersectional? Windblade won't be going anywhere and if anything she may get a bigger role.
ZeroWolf wrote:What would you deem intersectional? Windblade won't be going anywhere and if anything she may get a bigger role.
Here's a thought, maybe one of the first storylines will involve impactor and mirage, as per the fan vote. Maybe a one shot or a two parter.
Partholon@ if that was the case why not just kill the universe the moth before they lose the license? Doing it early and having a new title come out seems like a waste of money. I still think idw have kept the licenses, can't have a hasbroverse without all the pieces after all.
@galactic prime the movies had indeed become a mess and it was obvious that things will end like that
Etseterrestrial wrote:Pretty sure IDW was what kept some Transformers fans from going insane when the Bayverse movies were coming out.
partholon wrote:ZeroWolf wrote:What would you deem intersectional? Windblade won't be going anywhere and if anything she may get a bigger role.
Here's a thought, maybe one of the first storylines will involve impactor and mirage, as per the fan vote. Maybe a one shot or a two parter.
Partholon@ if that was the case why not just kill the universe the moth before they lose the license? Doing it early and having a new title come out seems like a waste of money. I still think idw have kept the licenses, can't have a hasbroverse without all the pieces after all.
@galactic prime the movies had indeed become a mess and it was obvious that things will end like that
well off the top of my head if there IS no new book and its just a winding up of the series then IDW will have a complete story they can pump out trade after trade after trade for a revenue stream for the company.(their contract should allow them to do this)
who wants to read 90% of a story? which is what you'd get if they just kept to the normal schedule and BANG lost the license - story unfinished . just look at how people still feel about dreamwaves getting shunt down mid tale.
and remember your still talking about the guts of a full year publishing here. for all i know the contract could be up in sept so they could be going right to the wall.
on the intersectional stuff i mainly mean the forced introduction of stuff like feminism/ transgender issues into a property where it really makes no sense. particularly when its done in the form of "new" characters who dont actually exist. lug anode aileron and the like.
this isnt xmen, its transformers. if i want to read about homosexual relationships i'll buy "strangers in paradise". i come here for the robot war steeped on intrigue and sci/fi concepts.
particualrly when its done in such a hamfisted heavy handed way as it seems to dominate the franchise.
i mean serioulsy LOOK at the cast of Optimus Prime right now.
Can anyone honsestly say thats their dream line up for a TF book?
and thats the one thats MEANT to have the "names" in it.
to address what another poster asked i DONT want g1. i'd be happy with the -ations level of story telling and cast back. even where barber was in RID at the end of season 1 would do.
whether people like it or not transformers is a comic, just like the JLA or the Avengers and sooner or later the books gets back to the "core cast" . it doesnt mean you cant mix it up, but if you dont have the heavy hitters you lose the audience.
take OP again as an example. barbers been seeding a conflict between pyra magna and prime- and its interesting - but that really should be grimlock shouldnt it?
cause just like hawkeye and cap, prime and the big grim have that relationship.
but were not getting that cause you know - gurls power or something. were in C list avengers territory here and most of its down to this intersectional nonsense demanding "representation".
partholon wrote:on the intersectional stuff i mainly mean the forced introduction of stuff like feminism/ transgender issues into a property where it really makes no sense.
particularly when its done in the form of "new" characters who dont actually exist. lug anode aileron and the like.
this isnt xmen, its transformers. if i want to read about homosexual relationships i'll buy "strangers in paradise". i come here for the robot war steeped on intrigue and sci/fi concepts.
i mean serioulsy LOOK at the cast of Optimus Prime right now.
Can anyone honsestly say thats their dream line up for a TF book?
to address what another poster asked i DONT want g1... barbers been seeding a conflict between pyra magna and prime- and its interesting - but that really should be grimlock shouldnt it? cause just like hawkeye and cap, prime and the big grim have that relationship.
but were not getting that cause you know - gurls power or something. were in C list avengers territory here and most of its down to this intersectional nonsense demanding "representation".
partholon wrote:ZeroWolf wrote:What would you deem intersectional? Windblade won't be going anywhere and if anything she may get a bigger role.
Here's a thought, maybe one of the first storylines will involve impactor and mirage, as per the fan vote. Maybe a one shot or a two parter.
Partholon@ if that was the case why not just kill the universe the moth before they lose the license? Doing it early and having a new title come out seems like a waste of money. I still think idw have kept the licenses, can't have a hasbroverse without all the pieces after all.
@galactic prime the movies had indeed become a mess and it was obvious that things will end like that
well off the top of my head if there IS no new book and its just a winding up of the series then IDW will have a complete story they can pump out trade after trade after trade for a revenue stream for the company.(their contract should allow them to do this)
who wants to read 90% of a story? which is what you'd get if they just kept to the normal schedule and BANG lost the license - story unfinished . just look at how people still feel about dreamwaves getting shunt down mid tale.
and remember your still talking about the guts of a full year publishing here. for all i know the contract could be up in sept so they could be going right to the wall.
on the intersectional stuff i mainly mean the forced introduction of stuff like feminism/ transgender issues into a property where it really makes no sense. particularly when its done in the form of "new" characters who dont actually exist. lug anode aileron and the like.
this isnt xmen, its transformers. if i want to read about homosexual relationships i'll buy "strangers in paradise". i come here for the robot war steeped on intrigue and sci/fi concepts.
particualrly when its done in such a hamfisted heavy handed way as it seems to dominate the franchise.
i mean serioulsy LOOK at the cast of Optimus Prime right now.
Can anyone honsestly say thats their dream line up for a TF book?
and thats the one thats MEANT to have the "names" in it.
to address what another poster asked i DONT want g1. i'd be happy with the -ations level of story telling and cast back. even where barber was in RID at the end of season 1 would do.
whether people like it or not transformers is a comic, just like the JLA or the Avengers and sooner or later the books gets back to the "core cast" . it doesnt mean you cant mix it up, but if you dont have the heavy hitters you lose the audience.
take OP again as an example. barbers been seeding a conflict between pyra magna and prime- and its interesting - but that really should be grimlock shouldnt it?
cause just like hawkeye and cap, prime and the big grim have that relationship.
but were not getting that cause you know - gurls power or something. were in C list avengers territory here and most of its down to this intersectional nonsense demanding "representation".
ZeroWolf wrote:Prime Nova wrote:Hope they keep scott off the books. They could bring Shane back because the Mars attack one shot was amazing. If they set it in that time line
I'm the opposite, keep Scott and ban Shane from ever working on tfs ever again. Or at least keep him to more self contained mini series.
As I've often said, I think the shared universe is sticking around especially with idw holding all the licenses.
Also who ever mentioned the exiles like tf series for Roberts to have fun with, I'm all in on that idea.
Also gender has always existed in transformers
...regardless if it made sense or not.
Rodimus Prime wrote:IDW, please PLEASE PLEASE keep James Roberts away from the reboot.
Caelus wrote:
There are no homosexual relationships among Transformers in the IDW comics, as Transformers in the IDW comics don't have sexes
Galactic Prime wrote:Caelus wrote:
Transformers in the IDW comics don't have sexes
All 4 characters are MALE GENDER.
Galactic Prime wrote:Caelus wrote:
There are no homosexual relationships among Transformers in the IDW comics, as Transformers in the IDW comics don't have sexes
Cyclonus and Tailgate.
Chromedome and Rewind.
Both of those are Homosexual relationships as all 4 characters are MALE GENDER.
Caelus wrote:Galactic Prime wrote:Caelus wrote:
There are no homosexual relationships among Transformers in the IDW comics, as Transformers in the IDW comics don't have sexes
Cyclonus and Tailgate.
Chromedome and Rewind.
Both of those are Homosexual relationships as all 4 characters are MALE GENDER.
But (1) they are not the same SEX because they are asexual and (2) their relationships aren't sexual in nature. No matter how badly you or scads of fan artists might want to imagine it, they don't **** each other.
Return to Transformers Cartoons and Comics Forum
Registered users: -Kanrabat-, Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], primeisboss, Yahoo [Bot]