Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store
Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
Shadowman wrote:Capt.Failure wrote:Shadowman wrote:That's about the most hypocritical thing in this entire thread.
I'm still waiting on him to actually contribute to the conversation. Until then accusations of hypocracy are unfounded. I don't give children on the internet the time of day.
Wow, are you being serious right now? Go re-read what Starscream Gaga said about Citizen Kane and the "plot hole" you brought up. Then go sit in the corner.
Capt.Failure wrote:Shadowman wrote:Capt.Failure wrote:Shadowman wrote:That's about the most hypocritical thing in this entire thread.
I'm still waiting on him to actually contribute to the conversation. Until then accusations of hypocracy are unfounded. I don't give children on the internet the time of day.
Wow, are you being serious right now? Go re-read what Starscream Gaga said about Citizen Kane and the "plot hole" you brought up. Then go sit in the corner.
Whatever. I tried to talk to you intelligently, but that's apparently not your cup of tea. If someone I used to hold to a higher regard is gonna fall to Starscream GaGa's level of logic then there's no point in continuing this topic.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Shadowman wrote:Capt.Failure wrote:Shadowman wrote:That's about the most hypocritical thing in this entire thread.
I'm still waiting on him to actually contribute to the conversation. Until then accusations of hypocracy are unfounded. I don't give children on the internet the time of day.
Wow, are you being serious right now? Go re-read what Starscream Gaga said about Citizen Kane and the "plot hole" you brought up. Then go sit in the corner.
NewFoundStarscreamLuv wrote:me and my friends combine all the time. Sometimes I even combine by myself if no one is around.
Evil_the_Nub wrote:Shadowman wrote:Capt.Failure wrote:Shadowman wrote:That's about the most hypocritical thing in this entire thread.
I'm still waiting on him to actually contribute to the conversation. Until then accusations of hypocracy are unfounded. I don't give children on the internet the time of day.
Wow, are you being serious right now? Go re-read what Starscream Gaga said about Citizen Kane and the "plot hole" you brought up. Then go sit in the corner.
I haven't seen Citizen Kane, but I have seen the opening scene. There was no one in the room with him. He whispered "rosebud" and dropped the snow globe. That's when the nurse came in the room.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Capt.Failure wrote:Shadowman wrote:Capt.Failure wrote:Shadowman wrote:That's about the most hypocritical thing in this entire thread.
I'm still waiting on him to actually contribute to the conversation. Until then accusations of hypocracy are unfounded. I don't give children on the internet the time of day.
Wow, are you being serious right now? Go re-read what Starscream Gaga said about Citizen Kane and the "plot hole" you brought up. Then go sit in the corner.
Whatever. I tried to talk to you intelligently, but that's apparently not your cup of tea. If someone I used to hold to a higher regard is gonna fall to Starscream GaGa's level of logic then there's no point in continuing this topic.
Starscream GaGa wrote:1...shave your face with a comb.
2And you can't say that something happens in a movie when you haven't seen it yourself. The nurse/maid DID hear Kane say "rosebud" and the fact that she told this to Jerry is the driving point fo the film. I have studied this film, I'm not pulling stuff out of my ass abotu a movie I've never seen like you have.
3Same with LOTR. I've seen the movies, I've read the book, the eagles could NOT have taken the Fellowship to Mordor, for many reasons which have all been stated and you have chosen to ignore and instead insulted me for proving you wrong.
Burn wrote:Starscream GaGa wrote:Has anyone else on this forum been so loud about they're opinion of the movies? Go check out any thread in which the movies are criticized and one or all three will be there going crazy.
There's been much louder over the years. There was a time you couldn't have a thread in the movie forum without one particular person jumping up and down bitching and moaning.
And I don't see the problem with what they're doing, as long as they keep it within the rules of the forum (and if people are curious, Sly's been warned about his language many times).
But what annoys me the most is your attitude towards them. You make them sound like what they're doing is bad, that they're the worst, but you seem to completely overlook all the negative comments that populate the movie forum.
Trust me, since 2009, their positivity is a small drop in the ocean of negative comments that have populated this sub-forum.
And I still don't see a problem with them defending the movies.
Capt.Failure wrote:Shadowman wrote:Capt.Failure wrote:Shadowman wrote:Capt.Failure wrote:
We just went over them, read back up the thread a few pages. Besides, minor technical and geographical errors are so common in films you can't count them. Only the discussed plot points matter, and we've come to the conclusion that aside from Wheelie's dissapearence, they don't. Your post was pointless.
And why shouldn't it count? Just because other movies are guilty of it doesn't make it okay. I mean they ignore the existence an entire freaking country for no reason! That's not a minor error, that's "You really need to look at a globe sometime."
The entire plot of Citizen Kane falls apart a few seconds in because nobody was in the room with him when he said "Rosebud." Yet that's acceptable.
The entire Lord of the Rings trilogy could have been ended in a few hours if they'd flown the Ring to Mordor via those giant eagles. Even fans of the novels agree that's a gigantic plot hole. Yet that's acceptable
In 2001 a trained astronaut went out in a space pod without a helmet, putting him in a life or death situation when he had to blow the hatch on his pod to reenter the ship. No trained astronaut would do something as stupid as not fully suit up for a spacewalk, no matter how dire the situation. Yet that's acceptable.
Here's my question. Why are these ok, but a geographical error in this film is such a massive sin? When something as simple and common as misreading a map becomes your only remaining arguement, then you've lost. Period.
The difference is, those movies had all of one mistake per movie. ROTF just packs in tons of mind-boggling errors.
While we're at it, the reason they didn't take the Eagles is because they were constantly being tracked and the Nazgul already had their own flying mounts. It's like taking a helicopter to an enemy base while the enemy in question has a squadron of F-22s.
The problem with the errors is that all the ones that matter have been deconstructed with a simple process called observation and application of logical thought. I find it funny this film comes under accusations of only being enjoyed by stupid, ADD addled masses yet critics of it fail to notice so much of the film that they just cast blanket accusations of "plot hole" all over it and call it a day.
Also, your rebuttal to the eagles plot hole in LotR is such bullcrap. Like there wasn't a risk of Nazgul on foot? If anything on foot it was a greater risk because the eagles could avoid them with fancy flying and they'd still get to Mordor in no time flat. The Fellowship plan relied on unreliable companions who the Ring could tempt, a far longer, more dangerous path through terrain of kingdoms who could not be trusted ending in an on foot journey through Mordor itself. This over flying the Ring there on eagles who are able to fight off the Nazgul's fel beast mounts in single combat. And to top it all off...the demigod in their group did nothing with those awesome magic powers until the Balrog showed up. Brilliant strategy right there.
And THAT, my friend, is a plot hole. It fails to hold up under scrutiny, unlike everything (bar Wheelie) listed in RotF. Again, you're back to simple geographical and technical flaws, which are not plot holes. Checkmate.
Burn wrote:Tekka wrote:In the end, yours is the only one you should be worried about, right?
But people NEED to know what I think! The NEED to think like me as they CLEARLY can't think for themselves if they're not thinking like me!
(That's sarcasm for those who are too stoopid to get it)
Tekka wrote:All my efforts at peacemaking have been thwarted... I think I'll go sit in the corner instead.
Stormer wrote:Bwaaaahahaha! Besides, don't you guys know NOT to argue with Shadowman yet?
Burn wrote:Stormer wrote:Bwaaaahahaha! Besides, don't you guys know NOT to argue with Shadowman yet?
Why not? It's just a handful of people who have fed his already inflated ego. He's quite boring at the end of the day and best ignored.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
craggy wrote:wow, from Michael Bay's Transformers to Citizen Kane. That's a bit of a leap.
RhA wrote:craggy wrote:wow, from Michael Bay's Transformers to Citizen Kane. That's a bit of a leap.
Nope. It's a go-to/kneejerk comparison.
shamone wrote:RhA wrote:craggy wrote:wow, from Michael Bay's Transformers to Citizen Kane. That's a bit of a leap.
Nope. It's a go-to/kneejerk comparison.
its kerazzy
typical bay fansformers, comparing a seminal piece of art, which established the grammar of cinema as we know it, a revolution in cinema making, with a movie about an old fart who cries about his sleigh
shamone wrote:RhA wrote:craggy wrote:wow, from Michael Bay's Transformers to Citizen Kane. That's a bit of a leap.
Nope. It's a go-to/kneejerk comparison.
its kerazzy
typical bay fansformers, comparing a seminal piece of art, which established the grammar of cinema as we know it, a revolution in cinema making, with a movie about an old fart who cries about his sleigh
SlyTF1 wrote:shamone wrote:RhA wrote:craggy wrote:wow, from Michael Bay's Transformers to Citizen Kane. That's a bit of a leap.
Nope. It's a go-to/kneejerk comparison.
its kerazzy
typical bay fansformers, comparing a seminal piece of art, which established the grammar of cinema as we know it, a revolution in cinema making, with a movie about an old fart who cries about his sleigh
See? Can't you see? That's what society wants you to think. I bet that movie is dog sh!t; nothing special about it at all. But people overreact and think it's the best thing ever. Seminal piece of art, my ass.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Shadowman wrote:SlyTF1 wrote:shamone wrote:RhA wrote:craggy wrote:wow, from Michael Bay's Transformers to Citizen Kane. That's a bit of a leap.
Nope. It's a go-to/kneejerk comparison.
its kerazzy
typical bay fansformers, comparing a seminal piece of art, which established the grammar of cinema as we know it, a revolution in cinema making, with a movie about an old fart who cries about his sleigh
See? Can't you see? That's what society wants you to think. I bet that movie is dog sh!t; nothing special about it at all. But people overreact and think it's the best thing ever. Seminal piece of art, my ass.
Have you or are you just saying it's awful because everyone else says it's good?
SlyTF1 wrote:Shadowman wrote:SlyTF1 wrote:shamone wrote:RhA wrote:craggy wrote:wow, from Michael Bay's Transformers to Citizen Kane. That's a bit of a leap.
Nope. It's a go-to/kneejerk comparison.
its kerazzy
typical bay fansformers, comparing a seminal piece of art, which established the grammar of cinema as we know it, a revolution in cinema making, with a movie about an old fart who cries about his sleigh
See? Can't you see? That's what society wants you to think. I bet that movie is dog sh!t; nothing special about it at all. But people overreact and think it's the best thing ever. Seminal piece of art, my ass.
Have you or are you just saying it's awful because everyone else says it's good?
Because everyone says it's good, and I've heard that there isn't a single explosion in it. Therefore, it sucks.
Shadowman wrote:I will put forth the theory that it was the internet itself trying to punch him in the face.
SlyTF1 wrote:Because everyone says it's good, and I've heard that there isn't a single explosion in it. Therefore, it sucks.
Return to Transformers Live Action Film Forum
Registered users: -Kanrabat-, Bing [Bot], Bumblevivisector, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], MSN [Bot], Roadbuster, Silver Wind, sprockitz, Yahoo [Bot], Ziusundra