Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store














Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
Cormaster628 wrote:I for one am ashamed of the whole Damn country and think it was pretty **** obvious McCain was the better choice. Thats all i'm going to say... I don't wanna piss off anyone with my true feelings about that pos
Keeperofthespark wrote:Barackamus Prime has the allspark at last!
Original Sin wrote:Is there anywhere online to watch Barack's speech?
I missed it
Mega Zarak wrote:As for the Reagan comment, I don't know did he? I've heard he did but has it been proven, I'm not getting smart I really don't know. At the same time we helped put Castro in power don't forget, people have a habit of using us and then changing their tune.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
Cormaster628 wrote:Oh and he obviously knows how to spend money since I saw one McCain ad for every 200 Obama ads.
Cormaster628 wrote:Some nobody from illinois starts talking "change" during the worst financial crises since the Great Depression and americans believe it!
But I'll still give him a chance.
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Mega Zarak wrote:As for the Reagan comment, I don't know did he? I've heard he did but has it been proven, I'm not getting smart I really don't know. At the same time we helped put Castro in power don't forget, people have a habit of using us and then changing their tune.
It is a proven fact that Reagan's administration funded ,trained and helped to placed the Taiban in power.Osama was one of many trained.
To simplify things.....The U.S. Government funded them to weakened Russian prescience in Afghanistan.
Cormaster628 wrote:I really haven't seen many ads for McCain honestly. I've seen a couple of Republican committee ad's thats about it. I live in Indiana, a state that NORMALLY is a red state.
Cannabis Prime wrote:I didn't know a super-sonic jet could park on the grass like that!
Caboose wrote:Time is not made out of lines! Time is made out of circles. That is why clocks are round!
Emperor Galvatron wrote:Starlock wrote:Should be interesting to see how the next 4 years go. Of course we still have 2 more months of Bush to screw something up for Obama to fix or try to fix.
Presidents don't make laws, spend money, or pork up unnecessary bailout bills. I was actually hoping that Obama was truly a Muslim, and therefore opposed to any pork. But alas, it is not true. Our glorious Comrades in Congress do that. Does the President propose bills, budgets, etc.? Yes. He also signs it into law. But Congress votes to allow it. Congress adds pork after pork after pork. And the last two presidents have been all too willing to sign anything that crosses their desk. Presidents can't do jack without Congress allowing it.
As far as fixing things? Nah. Won't happen. See, we'll have two years of social programs that will only cost us more money, another bailout is already being asked for by members of Congress, and we'll run off investors and large businesses that employ people by taxing them out of the country or business entirely. Then we'll have a populace that is dependant upon some government program to even survive, thus insuring that the same fat cats who don't have term limits keep going right back to Washington, plundering our tax dollars for their power trips. Trust me, things will not change for the better. Not while Congress is still composed of the socialist minded individuals there.
And anyone who thinks that Bush was a conservative or that McCain is either for that matter is sorely mistaken.
Me, Grimlock! wrote:I don't have cable and I'm in the middle of a huge move, but I'll want to see those speeches when I get the chance. I know Mkall posted the parts to Obama's speech halfway down page 6, but is there anywhere to see McCain's concession?
Me, Grimlock! wrote:Cnogratulations! I may live in Canada, but we're affected by the States in so many ways (and yet can't vote there! Go figure.)
Me, Grimlock! wrote:If only we could get some change over here.
Cormaster628 wrote:Honestly I don't think Bush did anything worse than Clinton. Everyone talks about oh how great the Clinton years were, and oh yeah thats right he let terrorist bomb the WTC and get away with it, he cut the military down to a fraction of its size, and he cheated on his wife and slept with an intern on the side. Yeah great president!
Cormaster628 wrote:Jimmy Carter was also a democrat and regarded as an even worse president than Bush. Putting a democrat in the Whitehouse won't solve anything.
Cormaster628 wrote:That being said I'll give Obama a chance. Maybe he'll actually "change" things, but I'm not for this socialist idea of "spreading the wealth around". The tax bracket system is already flawed...it should be a flat percentage rage regardless of how much money you make. They already have it set up so the "more you make the more we take".
Cormaster628 wrote:I just don't see what makes Obama so special. He's got hardly any experience, and he's a hell of a talker. Oh and he obviously knows how to spend money since I saw one McCain ad for every 200 Obama ads. I think America's been duped honestly. Some nobody from illinois starts talking "change" during the worst financial crises since the Great Depression and americans believe it!
But I'll still give him a chance.
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Cormaster628 wrote:Everyone hated Bush so bad that McCain didn't have a chance in hell of winning this election.
Everyone talks about oh how great the Clinton years were, and oh yeah thats right he let terrorist bomb the WTC and get away with it, he cut the military down to a fraction of its size, and he cheated on his wife and slept with an intern on the side. Yeah great president!
Jimmy Carter was also a democrat and regarded as an even worse president than Bush. Putting a democrat in the Whitehouse won't solve anything.
The tax bracket system is already flawed...it should be a flat percentage rage regardless of how much money you make. They already have it set up so the "more you make the more we take".
Oh and he obviously knows how to spend money since I saw one McCain ad for every 200 Obama ads.
I think America's been duped honestly.
But I'll still give him a chance.
Wingspan wrote:Cormaster628 wrote:I really haven't seen many ads for McCain honestly. I've seen a couple of Republican committee ad's thats about it. I live in Indiana, a state that NORMALLY is a red state.
Debunks my ad-placement theory.
Shadowman wrote:Cormaster628 wrote:Honestly I don't think Bush did anything worse than Clinton. Everyone talks about oh how great the Clinton years were, and oh yeah thats right he let terrorist bomb the WTC and get away with it, he cut the military down to a fraction of its size, and he cheated on his wife and slept with an intern on the side. Yeah great president!
We had info that the WTC attacks were going to happen weeks before, AFTER Clinton left office.
Shadowman wrote:See, why do people think he's a socialist? He said "Spread the wealth around" which, to the best of my knowledge, means giving a helping hand to those who don't have the means to help themselves.
Nekoman wrote:Shadowman wrote:See, why do people think he's a socialist? He said "Spread the wealth around" which, to the best of my knowledge, means giving a helping hand to those who don't have the means to help themselves.
“Spreading the wealth around” is socialism. But it does not matter to me what you wish to call it, it’s still wrong. The people who loose here are those who worked hard for their money, whereas the fools who blew all of theirs away will gain from this.
You work hard and the government takes all your earnings away. That’s a day in modern America...
Wigglez wrote:Just remember. The sword is an extension of your arm. Use it as if you're going to karate chop someone with your really long sharp ass hand.
Shadowman wrote:Nekoman wrote:Shadowman wrote:See, why do people think he's a socialist? He said "Spread the wealth around" which, to the best of my knowledge, means giving a helping hand to those who don't have the means to help themselves.
“Spreading the wealth around” is socialism. But it does not matter to me what you wish to call it, it’s still wrong. The people who loose here are those who worked hard for their money, whereas the fools who blew all of theirs away will gain from this.
You work hard and the government takes all your earnings away. That’s a day in modern America...
When did he even say that? Not "Spread the wealth around" I mean "I will take part of your money and give it to everyone else so everyone has an equal share." I mean, really, when did he say that? I have also said "Spread the wealth" to which I typically give someone a few dollars. Of course, I'm not a socialist.
Counterpunch wrote:Thanks to everyone who has helped to ruin this thread by the discussion of selfish partisian politics.
Paging Dr. Cyber Bishop...
Registered users: Big Grim, Bing [Bot], Blackmoon, bluecatcinema, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Lunatyk, MSN [Bot], Yahoo [Bot]