Gauntlet101010 wrote:I just feel like the "it's not G1 enough" argument is a really bad one and completely fan-centric without regards to outside factors.
To me, complaining about paint apps, easily corrected sculpting problems, assembly errors, fragility, and lack of new heads seem to be very logical arguments. These are the sorta arguments that make alot of sence.
But complaining that it isn't slavishly faithful to a cartoon show from 20 years ago when they are clearly upgraded figures doesn't make any sence. The cartoon models don't actually transform. Moreover they're 80's vehicles, this is the new millenium. The design astetic is blocky and plain where modern toys have to be fairly complex and fluid. The cartoon models don't exactly lend themselves to articulation either; alot of that movement is not possible.
I mean, at a certain point, you have to stand back and say "the Neo G1 stuff is a refreshing blast from the past" instead of complaining that it isn't slavishly recrating your childhood.
Re: your "hilarious" (?) imageskywarp-2 wrote:that's wierd?? I thought that he didn't have a trailer port.. hmmm maybe they were gonna do one, but changed their minds..
I really wish they had rethought Voyager Prime's forearms, and given him some yellow triangles instead of paint brushes.. he looks like he's a handy man waiting to fix something!! the spatula says he's a cook..some minor changes should have been done before it left the factory..
Gauntlet101010 wrote:I just feel like the "it's not G1 enough" argument is a really bad one and completely fan-centric without regards to outside factors.
To me, complaining about paint apps, easily corrected sculpting problems, assembly errors, fragility, and lack of new heads seem to be very logical arguments. These are the sorta arguments that make alot of sence.
But complaining that it isn't slavishly faithful to a cartoon show from 20 years ago when they are clearly upgraded figures doesn't make any sence. The cartoon models don't actually transform. Moreover they're 80's vehicles, this is the new millenium. The design astetic is blocky and plain where modern toys have to be fairly complex and fluid. The cartoon models don't exactly lend themselves to articulation either; alot of that movement is not possible.
I mean, at a certain point, you have to stand back and say "the Neo G1 stuff is a refreshing blast from the past" instead of complaining that it isn't slavishly recrating your childhood.
Sledge wrote:Spatulas? Paint brushes? Are you high? Now, can't you just put "I don't like the Classics line that much" in your sig and STFU about it? You are clearly in a very small minority on this one. Most people thought the Classics line was great (it was), and are looking forward to next year's additions. And complaining about PRIME? One of the best figures in the Classics line-up? My standard advice applies here: if you don't like it, don't buy it.
AlienQuiksilver wrote:skywarp-2 is our cynical conspiracy theorist. While most of us are happy with what's good about TF's, he's habitually negative about everything else.
I say ... enjoy your toys. Hasbro will do what they will, so deal with it.
It's nice to see both sides of things, but we can only take so much dude.
Counterpunch wrote:Thank you to the following three posters... I was beginning to think I had missed out on the 'crazy-pill' dosage for the morning.Gauntlet101010 wrote:I just feel like the "it's not G1 enough" argument is a really bad one and completely fan-centric without regards to outside factors.
To me, complaining about paint apps, easily corrected sculpting problems, assembly errors, fragility, and lack of new heads seem to be very logical arguments. These are the sorta arguments that make alot of sence.
But complaining that it isn't slavishly faithful to a cartoon show from 20 years ago when they are clearly upgraded figures doesn't make any sence. The cartoon models don't actually transform. Moreover they're 80's vehicles, this is the new millenium. The design astetic is blocky and plain where modern toys have to be fairly complex and fluid. The cartoon models don't exactly lend themselves to articulation either; alot of that movement is not possible.
I mean, at a certain point, you have to stand back and say "the Neo G1 stuff is a refreshing blast from the past" instead of complaining that it isn't slavishly recrating your childhood.
Excellent post.Sledge wrote:Spatulas? Paint brushes? Are you high? Now, can't you just put "I don't like the Classics line that much" in your sig and STFU about it? You are clearly in a very small minority on this one. Most people thought the Classics line was great (it was), and are looking forward to next year's additions. And complaining about PRIME? One of the best figures in the Classics line-up? My standard advice applies here: if you don't like it, don't buy it.
Yes.AlienQuiksilver wrote:skywarp-2 is our cynical conspiracy theorist. While most of us are happy with what's good about TF's, he's habitually negative about everything else.
I say ... enjoy your toys. Hasbro will do what they will, so deal with it.
It's nice to see both sides of things, but we can only take so much dude.
That's because in discussions like this, there is no real discussion. The OP is "acknowledging" the fact that other people are bringing up legitimate arguments and points but is in the same breath not actually considering the argument of the other side.
Perfectly legitimate statements are glossed over because they strain the personal credulity of Skywarp-2's argument that we can somehow drastically alter Hasbro's designs.
And directly, Skywarp-2, you are habitually negative. Nothing is ever good enough. When you start arguing that Classics isn't a good enough modernization of G1, well, people are just not going to give credit to your arguments anymore.
Besides, if you start a wide open discussion like this and argue a left field point of view, you're going to have to defend the hell out of it before you get some respect for your position.
Counterpunch wrote:And directly, Skywarp-2, you are habitually negative. Nothing is ever good enough. When you start arguing that Classics isn't a good enough modernization of G1, well, people are just not going to give credit to your arguments anymore.
Jeep! wrote:Why do I imagine Dead Metal sounding exactly like Arnie?
Intah-wib-buls?
Blurrz wrote:10/10
Leave it to Dead Metal to have the word 'Pronz' in his signature.
Dead Metal wrote:So what's wrong with Optimus Prime's crouch?
AlienQuiksilver wrote:Nobody's insulting your overall character SW-2. We are just stating your tendency toward certain things. We all know there is more to you than that, it doesn't define you as a person. The comments at you are fair, you are just taking them too personally ... and getting defensive.
Sure, Sledge was a bit out of line ... but that's the Sledge we know. He gets plenty of guff for it. I can count on him to set me straight if I ever need it.
Your changes would be fine looking, but some wouldn't agree with you ... possibly somebody who is much like yourself.
Hasbro can't please everybody, so I don't gripe much about what I dislike. This is why people kitbash. Go ahead and make the changes. If you don't have the time/patience to learn how to modify things ... then it must not be THAT important to you.
Sure, the spatula crotch is apparent. If I woke up screaming in the middle of the night, because I had a nightmare involving OP's spatula crotch ...
I'd probably have bigger things to worry about. In NO way do these minute details take anything away from the figure.
Hasbro cannot make everybody happy. Your changes would have other people throwing up their arms. Why should you always be the one that is pleased?
Calm down dude. We all still like ya here ... just trying to bring you back to earth a lil bit.
skywarp-2 wrote:Dead Metal wrote:So what's wrong with Optimus Prime's crouch?
if a simple deduction of Paint on it were done it wouldn't look like a Kitty Litter scooper..
Jeep! wrote:Why do I imagine Dead Metal sounding exactly like Arnie?
Intah-wib-buls?
Blurrz wrote:10/10
Leave it to Dead Metal to have the word 'Pronz' in his signature.
skywarp-2 wrote:but I did think you were a good protector of keeping the attacks on a issue level versus personal?? I mean, afterall we are debating toys here, and not calling each other's momma's names..
Leonardo wrote:Now you've edited your post, skywarp-2, I have to admit, the yellow arrows on his forearms don't look very good. I think the actual version looks better in that respect. The crotch recolouring works, though.
Damolisher wrote::-x Did I just read criticism of Classic Jetfire? Classics Jetfire, the best Voyager sized figure of the last 7 years, that Jetfire? f you don't like that Jetfire, there's no pleasin' ya.
Dr. Z wrote:Damolisher wrote::-x Did I just read criticism of Classic Jetfire? Classics Jetfire, the best Voyager sized figure of the last 7 years, that Jetfire? f you don't like that Jetfire, there's no pleasin' ya.
Best Voyager of the last 7 years? Where have you been all that time? I could probably name 10 better Voyager figures than Jetfire.
Counterpunch wrote:Dr. Z wrote:Damolisher wrote::-x Did I just read criticism of Classic Jetfire? Classics Jetfire, the best Voyager sized figure of the last 7 years, that Jetfire? f you don't like that Jetfire, there's no pleasin' ya.
Best Voyager of the last 7 years? Where have you been all that time? I could probably name 10 better Voyager figures than Jetfire.
Mudflap!
He ROCKS!
skywarp-2 wrote:Counterpunch wrote:Dr. Z wrote:Damolisher wrote::-x Did I just read criticism of Classic Jetfire? Classics Jetfire, the best Voyager sized figure of the last 7 years, that Jetfire? f you don't like that Jetfire, there's no pleasin' ya.
Best Voyager of the last 7 years? Where have you been all that time? I could probably name 10 better Voyager figures than Jetfire.
Mudflap!
He ROCKS!
yes!! I concur, Mudflap was an extremely cool transformer!! his head sculpt, the body articulation.. he was just too sweet!! What kind of Classics repaint would he make?? Becaue I would totally buy his repaint!!!
Counterpunch wrote:skywarp-2 wrote:Counterpunch wrote:
Mudflap!
He ROCKS!
yes!! I concur, Mudflap was an extremely cool transformer!! his head sculpt, the body articulation.. he was just too sweet!! What kind of Classics repaint would he make?? Becaue I would totally buy his repaint!!!
I'm with ya there...
He'd make a killer Grapple.
skywarp-2 wrote:Would this simple change have been so bad??
Wes Crayon wrote:I do like that change! Admittedly, I'm not all that off on voyagers anyway -- I generally like my action figures to stay in the 4.5"-6" range; it's matter of personal preference obviously not shared by many around these parts-- but the blue shoulders were among the main reason that I didn't buy the voyager Prime. That said, I'm not sure if they have blue in the back, so has anyone tried switching the shoulders? I'm not sure if that would work,
Wes Crayon wrote:skywarp-2 wrote:Would this simple change have been so bad??
I do like that change! Admittedly, I'm not all that off on voyagers anyway -- I generally like my action figures to stay in the 4.5"-6" range; it's matter of personal preference obviously not shared by many around these parts-- but the blue shoulders were among the main reason that I didn't buy the voyager Prime. That said, I'm not sure if they have blue in the back, so has anyone tried switching the shoulders? I'm not sure if that would work, but if it did I imagine that the screw holes could be covered with some reprolabels faction symbols.
Anyway, it's not a bad figure (judging from the UM that I have), but I personally prefer the smaller and more poseable deluxe Prime... even though he didn't have faction symbols on his shoulders either.
Jeep! wrote:Why do I imagine Dead Metal sounding exactly like Arnie?
Intah-wib-buls?
Blurrz wrote:10/10
Leave it to Dead Metal to have the word 'Pronz' in his signature.
Return to Transformers Toys Discussion
Registered users: agg23, Aubreybot, Bennington1234, Bing [Bot], Bumblevivisector, Chaingun, chuckdawg1999, Freezie, gemiga, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, maxg, MSN [Bot], shabanowitz, Silver Wind, sprockitz, ThunderThruster, TigrisEye, UltOrange, victori, Yahoo [Bot]