Ironhidensh wrote:The question shouldn't be "are we ready for a black president?", it should be "are we, as a nation, finally mature enough to look beyond a person's skin color, and/or gender, and see them for the potential they bring?".
No, I don't think we are.
But I can see him getting elected because of it just as easily as not getting elected because of it.
And honestly, I think that would be a good thing if he got elected on the basis of skin color, because it would stir up the mix a bit. It would be a landmark moment of history. Thurgood Marshall, Barak Obama. It would turn the tide for the future of a little more equality.
The same can be said about Hilary, but I'm not as familiar with her. I just think that the democrats don't stand a chance if she gets the ballot, since so many people hate her guts.
And yes, I know I'm perpetuating racial and sexist ideas by saying it would be good for them to be elected for that reason. But I truly believe a lot of people can't look past those things in issues like this. Hell, I'll admit it: I don't think I can either. I know logically it shouldn't make a difference, but I keep thinking, "damn a black or female president sure would stir things up". At least let some sort of progress come from it.
Of course, all that's moot if they're crappy presidents. But I like Barak's stances so far, meaning I haven't read anything about him yet that I don't like. Now if it was Condoleeza Rice running, I would still say "a black woman in the white house would REALLY stir things up," but I would not vote for her.
I intend to vote for Obama, but I might be registering as a Republican and voting for Hagel for the primary. You wanna talk about problem presidents, let's start with Brownback.
Actually, let's not get started about him.