sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:Tramp wrote:My claim with the Japanese shows was that all of them before RID was in the same continuity, and that is true. RiD AKA Car Robots started a new continuity.
That is not true.
Headmasters was suppose to be in their G1 continuity.
Supergod Masterforce was the start of a new continuity that incloued Victory.The proff of that is in the change or human headmaster the return of the planet's Mars and Seibertron both destroyed in Headmasters and a new in dialoge explanation for how Transformers came to be on Earth.No mention of any other Transformers in earth History was ever mention in the Masterforce show.
Why cant you just admit you made a mistake.
I have treated you with the up most Respect.Unlike many others that you seemed to have agitated into conflict with you over your views,getting into name calling and such things.I spent the better amount of 4 hours looking trew back-up files and redown loading the files you requested so that you could see it for your self...............
I even supported you when I beleved your claims were correct.
But how can you debate me on this when you havent even seen the shows in question?I have both the dubed and original language DVD's [with sub-titles]of all these shows.
And you still wont admit you made a mistake!!!!!!!!!!
Why dont you treat me with the same respect I have showen you??????????
Supergod Masterforce and
Victory are part of the same continuity as
Headmmasters, they simply take place later. They were not the start of a different continuity. RID was the start of a new continuity. Not even the information you sent me says that they were. You assumed they were because they have humans acting as pilots. That isn't proof of a change in continuity. All that is, is an advancement in the headmaster technology. You haven't shown solid proof that SGM started a new continuity. It's still Japanese G1 continuity, which is a
direct offshoot of US cartoon continuity. Yes, there are minor differences in translation between the US toon and Japanese toon, but they are close enough to be considered the same continuity, and that, I believe was the Japanese intent.
Scramble City, was only one episode, and a bunch of toy commercials, and does not seriously contradict anything in the US G1 cartoon, any more than events within the US G1 contradicts itself, and the feeling I gathered from what was said about it on the movie DVD is that yes, it is meant to fit within even US continutiy, because it doesn't
majorly contradict anything. Even your information you sent stated that it wasn't until
Headmasters that the Japanese branched off primarily because they didn't feel having humans as the headmaster heads would sell in Japan given that most mecha shows there have the robots piloted by humans, and thus, would remove the uniqueness of
TransFormers.
Headmansters,
Supergod Masterforce,
Victory, and
Zone, are all part of the Japanese G1 continuity, as is BW, BWII, BW Neo, and I believe, BM. Teletraaan 1 says that, as does, if I recall (a far more reliable source) correctly, the Ultimate Guide, but I have to verify that, so don't quote me on that. Anime News Netwrk, one of the most respected online sources of information on anime series also states it is the
sequel to
Headmasters at the very top. Here's the link:
http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/encyclopedia/anime.php?id=2476. [i]Car Robots is a new continuity all together. There is no question about that, and I have never claimed otherwise. As I said earlier, I have to do some more research into this and other things before I do anything else regarding Primus, which we should really be discussing, not thwe Japanese shows.
Secondly, I shouldn't have to say "I made a mistake" in those specific words. There is no need for it, especially if a different statement or clarification agrees with what you said, as in the case of Prowl. Trying to force someone to say that
in those words, can piss them off, because it's childish, and does not let them save face because you are trying to force them to eat crow. And no, I do not consider you childish. It doesn't with me, but it really isn't necesaary, and isn't likely to get me to say those specific words. And that isn't being disrespectful. If you notice, I have never asked you or anyone else to say "I made a mistake" or "I was wrong", because I don't consider it necessary. It isn't important to me. I don't need my ego stroked, and I respect you too much to do that to you. If something I say is proven irrefutably with cited material, to be in error, I'll admit it, though not necesaarily in those words. So, please let me choose to say things the way I choose to.