The Energon Pub

News Credits: 387 · by **Nekoman** » Mon Jun 01, 2009 2:42 pm

The Motion Picture Association of America has given Transformers Revenge of The Fallen it's official rating which is PG-13, like the last film. Reasons given were for "intense sequences of sci-fi action violence, language, some crude and sexual material, and brief drug material". To view the page for yourself, click here.

News Credits: 3 · by **Ultra_Jetstorm** » Mon Jun 01, 2009 3:14 pm

What is with the "Drug Use"? I dont like that because I may not be able to take my younger cousin to see it.

News Credits: 9 · by **Zeds** » Mon Jun 01, 2009 3:48 pm

Frack. I was praying for an 'R.'

by **Mechas8n** » Mon Jun 01, 2009 4:07 pm

Ultra_Jetstorm wrote:What is with the "Drug Use"? I dont like that because I may not be able to take my younger cousin to see it.

Probabley someone references someone else as being "High" or "Stoned".....

or Bumblebee could be on crack.

News Credits: 1 · by **FanBoiTonio** » Mon Jun 01, 2009 4:19 pm

***SPOILERS***

:twisted:

Judy (Sam's mom) eats a pot brownie whole when they bring Sam to school, she doesn't heed the warning that there's 'too much sugar' in it :mrgreen:

by **80sgeek** » Mon Jun 01, 2009 4:52 pm

I was thinking the drug reference would be some extras thinking that they're seeing things when cars turn into giant talking robots.

Website · by **Varia31** » Mon Jun 01, 2009 6:01 pm

Hopefully this movie won't have as much uncalled for immoral content as the first movie.

by **meshnut** » Mon Jun 01, 2009 6:15 pm

"Hopefully this movie won't have as much uncalled for immoral content as the first movie."

LOL! What "immoral content"?

Website · by **Varia31** » Mon Jun 01, 2009 6:26 pm

meshnut wrote:"Hopefully this movie won't have as much uncalled for immoral content as the first movie."

LOL! What "immoral content"?

For your information, the way Megan Fox is dressed, what Sam's mom talks to him about when she and his dad come into the room, and the inappropiate pictures Sam mentions when he leaves a recording on his cell phone. All of these something Transformers would be better without.

by **Mechas8n** » Mon Jun 01, 2009 7:03 pm

You may have thought it was immoral but there was an element of truth in it.

After all

:twisted:

But Shia LeBeouf is a wanker!!!!

Website · by **Varia31** » Mon Jun 01, 2009 7:30 pm

Mechas8n wrote:You may have thought it was immoral but there was an element of truth in it.

After all

But Shia LeBeouf is a wanker!!!!

This much is true, after all, you would be surprised what stars and celebs are really like in their personal lives. :wink:

by **meshnut** » Mon Jun 01, 2009 8:06 pm

"the way Megan Fox is dressed"

show of hands....who wants less of that?.......anyone?

and yes, there is truth in the presence of these elements.

plus she's hot as all hell so it does nothing but get more butts in the seats. =)

by **syphonn** » Mon Jun 01, 2009 10:04 pm

Nekoman wrote:... some crude and sexual material,...

Deja Vu?

News Credits: 1 · by **T-Macksimus** » Mon Jun 01, 2009 11:39 pm

FanBoiTonio wrote:***SPOILERS***

Judy (Sam's mom) eats a pot brownie whole when they bring Sam to school, she doesn't heed the warning that there's 'too much sugar' in it

O M F G that is hilarious! Won't stop me from taking my kids to see it. They already know about...some...of my past so nothing new to them. But that is just going to be great to watch. I hope she pulls it off well in the movie.
As for anything else in the film, there isn't anything that's going to surprise my boys. They've heard all there is language wise (I blame their grandmother, honest

) and as far as violence...I spar with weapons with my kids like some dads play catch. Bonding means breaking out the throwing knives in my household so I don't think the violence will phase them. :grin:

News Credits: 1 · by **Elita One** » Tue Jun 02, 2009 9:58 pm

Mechas8n wrote:

or Bumblebee could be on crack.

by **80sgeek** » Wed Jun 03, 2009 7:55 pm

meshnut wrote:"the way Megan Fox is dressed"

show of hands....who wants less of that?.......anyone?

and yes, there is truth in the presence of these elements.

plus she's hot as all hell so it does nothing but get more butts in the seats. =)

Wait do you mean less of Megan Fox dressed like in the first film or less of Megan Fox dressed? Cause if it's the later you got my vote!

by **DMan304** » Wed Jun 03, 2009 8:46 pm

Does that mean more masturbation jokes.

News Credits: 1 · by **T-Macksimus** » Wed Jun 03, 2009 11:06 pm

If they want to maintain as much realism as possible (Giant F'ing Robots notwithstanding) then you have to figure that if they are going to have anything involving a college campus it's going to go downhill in a hurry.
Some of my best times in my late teen's/early twenties were had at Western Washington University...and I wasn't even enrolled there! :grin:

Hell, one weekend I couldn't get up there to party so my room-mate went up and drove 80 miles back down with an exchange student for me.(Hotter than Megan Fox that's for sure!)
If they wanted to make this movie truly realistic they'd have to jack it to an "R" rating at least. Cheesy masturbation jokes would be the least of our worries.

by **Li Lioeliatus** » Fri Jun 05, 2009 8:44 am

The first film was a lot of things. Nightmarish, terrifying in a bad way and silly.

But Megan Fox's clothes were never immoral.

And I dought they will be immoral in this one either.

A campus is going to be a little bit bad given it is full of insane and hormonal teenagers.
So long the insanity is kept to a minimum it will be fine.
And no baseness or grossout humour would be good.

So long as they minimise that new idiot thing male it will be fine.

I have bad feelings about that loser they cast with Sam.