Ironhidensh wrote:Burn wrote:We COULD define inappropriate, but then everyone's definition is likely to change.
So we'll just go with no chick pics at all.
That's the new ruling. Not open for discussion guys.
I know this is discussing it, but I just wanted to say that for the first time I get it. In way too short an amount of time (my babies are growing up ), my boys will be looking at sights like this, as they try and find more info about their favorite toys and cartoons. As a parent, I'd be a little upset if they stumbled upon a thread like the old one on a sight dedicated to children's toys. It's gonna be hard enough to protect them from the Internet as it is.
Then the solution to that problem is to not let them surf the internet unsupervised. Duh. Lack of supervision is why I discovered my first porn site when I was 11. All it takes is typing "boobs" into Google and letting the dice roll.
And aside from which, there are so much worse things they can encounter on the internet than the safe-for-work images available in the former thread.