Tammuz wrote:dunno about standard, maybe the default.
Mogwai Prime wrote:Tammuz wrote:dunno about standard, maybe the default.
I was thinking more of the size than anything else. I feel a standard to do rankings wouldn't be a bad thing so people aren't getting confused by different ranking systems.
Tammuz wrote:Mogwai Prime wrote:Tammuz wrote:dunno about standard, maybe the default.
I was thinking more of the size than anything else. I feel a standard to do rankings wouldn't be a bad thing so people aren't getting confused by different ranking systems.
people are gonna get confused no matter what. i remember some of lucky's sigs a rememeber thinking, "my god, it's full of bars" but i'd need an encyclopedia to tell me what they meant.
i guess what i'm trying to say is that while nice and all and a very good outlet for creativity at the end of the day it's pretty meaningless unless you already know what tournie is what bar, and if you know that you probably already know who won anyway. so it's pretty much something for the winner, rather than to let people know who the winner is
neliz wrote:well, if you agree to lighten up the colors to actually represent their respective medals
I agree with Raphael that especially bronze is too dark brown, highlighting it would help.
but as a template? sure!
Tammuz wrote:but, getting back to my original point, why do they all have to be the same shape? maybe it would be better if they where VERY destinctive from each other in that case?
Absolute Zero wrote:We could actually start a records thread, noting all the tournaments/scalp hunts/scavenger hunts and who won them and who ran them and the dates they ran during.
Tammuz wrote:but, getting back to my original point, why do they all have to be the same shape? maybe it would be better if they where VERY destinctive from each other in that case?
Fearless Echoes wrote:Tammuz wrote:but, getting back to my original point, why do they all have to be the same shape? maybe it would be better if they where VERY destinctive from each other in that case?
Becuase if they aint smal and reasonably shaped, the better/more active/more dedicated commanders will run out of useable sig space for the actual sig.
Of course they could just chose not to use the medals, but then, why bother making the medals if they aint gonna be used?
Fearless Echoes wrote:Absolute Zero wrote:We could actually start a records thread, noting all the tournaments/scalp hunts/scavenger hunts and who won them and who ran them and the dates they ran during.
That'd be a good idea.
Wingspan wrote:Fearless Echoes wrote:Absolute Zero wrote:We could actually start a records thread, noting all the tournaments/scalp hunts/scavenger hunts and who won them and who ran them and the dates they ran during.
That'd be a good idea.
Seconded. Who maintains?
Recommend post #1 contains links to subsequent posts which contain results. Would allow for quick navigation and a quick review of everything that's tracked; results can be grouped according to event type in that first post and posted in the order they occurred.
Wingspan wrote:Fearless Echoes wrote:Tammuz wrote:but, getting back to my original point, why do they all have to be the same shape? maybe it would be better if they where VERY destinctive from each other in that case?
Becuase if they aint smal and reasonably shaped, the better/more active/more dedicated commanders will run out of useable sig space for the actual sig.
Of course they could just chose not to use the medals, but then, why bother making the medals if they aint gonna be used?
Some shaping differences may be nice (oval, square...) long term but general size consistency will help. Organizers should - however - be able to override the templates as deemed. They just have to sponsor their own photobucket (or similar) then. Utility may be affected by conformity though (less uniform, less usable given site signature rules) unless signatures are totally devoted to ribbons.
Absolute Zero wrote:We could actually start a records thread, noting all the tournaments/scalp hunts/scavenger hunts and who won them and who ran them and the dates they ran during.
neliz wrote:it's either that, or have the sig hyperlink to an "achievements" thread (with no crap posting) that would list the achievements per user.
neliz wrote:Absolute Zero wrote:We could actually start a records thread, noting all the tournaments/scalp hunts/scavenger hunts and who won them and who ran them and the dates they ran during.
Holy ****, you're an idea scalper as well!neliz wrote:it's either that, or have the sig hyperlink to an "achievements" thread (with no crap posting) that would list the achievements per user.
Mogwai Prime wrote:... if that makes sense.
Absolute Zero wrote:neliz wrote:Absolute Zero wrote:We could actually start a records thread, noting all the tournaments/scalp hunts/scavenger hunts and who won them and who ran them and the dates they ran during.
Holy !@#$, you're an idea scalper as well!neliz wrote:it's either that, or have the sig hyperlink to an "achievements" thread (with no crap posting) that would list the achievements per user.
Not really. They're simular, but that was unintentional since I was ignoring you. You want something like Live with a seperate page per user. I'm suggesting a single thread with just archived results from each tournament/hunt. Who won, who ran, and whatever other ribbons there are for the hunt/tournie. Each hunt/tournie gets it's own post would be the ideal way, with it locked and stickied to keep people from spamming it.
Absolute Zero wrote:
Not really. They're simular, but that was unintentional since I was ignoring you. You want something like Live with a seperate page per user. I'm suggesting a single thread with just archived results from each tournament/hunt. Who won, who ran, and whatever other ribbons there are for the hunt/tournie. Each hunt/tournie gets it's own post would be the ideal way, with it locked and stickied to keep people from spamming it.
neliz wrote:Absolute Zero wrote:
Not really. They're simular, but that was unintentional since I was ignoring you. You want something like Live with a seperate page per user. I'm suggesting a single thread with just archived results from each tournament/hunt. Who won, who ran, and whatever other ribbons there are for the hunt/tournie. Each hunt/tournie gets it's own post would be the ideal way, with it locked and stickied to keep people from spamming it.
Nope, I was going for a single thread as well. basically one post per user where he updates his own info (hence the "no crap" posting.)
Absolute Zero wrote:For the matrix champion banner... Instead of champion, how about like a gold star in the right corner/side.
Mogwai Prime wrote:Absolute Zero wrote:For the matrix champion banner... Instead of champion, how about like a gold star in the right corner/side.
Like this?
Absolute Zero wrote:Mogwai Prime wrote:Absolute Zero wrote:For the matrix champion banner... Instead of champion, how about like a gold star in the right corner/side.
Like this?
Other side(my fault, reversed left/right again), but Yeah. Champion covered a lot of the image.
Thinking about it... since people were complaining about the bronze before, what about just using gold bars? 1 for 3rd, 2 for 2nd, and 3 for 1st, or military rank...
Mogwai Prime wrote:Matrix Champion:
Places:
1st Place
2nd Place
3rd Place
Return to Heavy Metal War Forum
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], Yahoo [Bot]