Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store







Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
Posted before fully reading the article, ass out of you and mewilliam-james88 wrote:
For something this significant, you'd expect a quote or a source. Its just sloppy clickbait without that.
carytheone wrote:Posted before fully reading the article, ass out of you and mewilliam-james88 wrote:
For something this significant, you'd expect a quote or a source. Its just sloppy clickbait without that.![]()
I'm not going back read, but what's the general consensus on Bumblebee as there was both consistent and contradictory info in the movie. Intentional or not I feel it was a bit of a soft reboot or they at least tidied up a few things.
william-james88 wrote:carytheone wrote:Posted before fully reading the article, ass out of you and mewilliam-james88 wrote:
For something this significant, you'd expect a quote or a source. Its just sloppy clickbait without that.![]()
I'm not going back read, but what's the general consensus on Bumblebee as there was both consistent and contradictory info in the movie. Intentional or not I feel it was a bit of a soft reboot or they at least tidied up a few things.
Its a stand alone film within a larger universe that is only slightly alluded to.
Leonardo wrote:Take your lips off my pipe!
Ironhidensh wrote:william-james88 wrote:carytheone wrote:Posted before fully reading the article, ass out of you and mewilliam-james88 wrote:
For something this significant, you'd expect a quote or a source. Its just sloppy clickbait without that.![]()
I'm not going back read, but what's the general consensus on Bumblebee as there was both consistent and contradictory info in the movie. Intentional or not I feel it was a bit of a soft reboot or they at least tidied up a few things.
Its a stand alone film within a larger universe that is only slightly alluded to.
Its a reboot. They just don't want to come out and say it so they can continue to milk as much money out of the other five films as possible.
Blastback wrote:Ironhidensh wrote:william-james88 wrote:carytheone wrote:Posted before fully reading the article, ass out of you and mewilliam-james88 wrote:
For something this significant, you'd expect a quote or a source. Its just sloppy clickbait without that.![]()
I'm not going back read, but what's the general consensus on Bumblebee as there was both consistent and contradictory info in the movie. Intentional or not I feel it was a bit of a soft reboot or they at least tidied up a few things.
Its a stand alone film within a larger universe that is only slightly alluded to.
Its a reboot. They just don't want to come out and say it so they can continue to milk as much money out of the other five films as possible.
Yeah that's my take on it to. Probably also worried about alinetating fans of the previous films.
A lot of misinformation comes from the movies.william-james88 wrote:Blastback wrote:Ironhidensh wrote:william-james88 wrote:carytheone wrote:Posted before fully reading the article, ass out of you and mewilliam-james88 wrote:
For something this significant, you'd expect a quote or a source. Its just sloppy clickbait without that.![]()
I'm not going back read, but what's the general consensus on Bumblebee as there was both consistent and contradictory info in the movie. Intentional or not I feel it was a bit of a soft reboot or they at least tidied up a few things.
Its a stand alone film within a larger universe that is only slightly alluded to.
Its a reboot. They just don't want to come out and say it so they can continue to milk as much money out of the other five films as possible.
Yeah that's my take on it to. Probably also worried about alinetating fans of the previous films.
The point is there is a lot of misinformation out there and it seems fans are desperate for someone else to tell them what they are watching instead of forming their own thoughts on the matter.
william-james88 wrote:Blastback wrote:Ironhidensh wrote:william-james88 wrote:carytheone wrote:Posted before fully reading the article, ass out of you and mewilliam-james88 wrote:
For something this significant, you'd expect a quote or a source. Its just sloppy clickbait without that.![]()
I'm not going back read, but what's the general consensus on Bumblebee as there was both consistent and contradictory info in the movie. Intentional or not I feel it was a bit of a soft reboot or they at least tidied up a few things.
Its a stand alone film within a larger universe that is only slightly alluded to.
Its a reboot. They just don't want to come out and say it so they can continue to milk as much money out of the other five films as possible.
Yeah that's my take on it to. Probably also worried about alinetating fans of the previous films.
The point is there is a lot of misinformation out there and it seems fans are desperate for someone else to tell them what they are watching instead of forming their own thoughts on the matter.
Leonardo wrote:Take your lips off my pipe!
Ironhidensh wrote:No. I'd say they are desperate to know that the Bay movies are gone and not coming back.
ZeroWolf wrote:What is the next film? Is it bee 2 or the Cybertron prequel?
Personally I feel they are trying to have the best of both worlds. Keep the established aesthetic going for this universe and retcon out the things that aren't working. I also feel it's pretty moot, but that may because I'm just not that invested in it all. I take each movie like a piece of bubblegum, enjoy it while it lasts and spit it out once it starts tasting bad. They've said it's not a reboot, so it's not until we hear otherwise. The Bumblebee movie straight up contradicted a few things and it'd be nice to have some concrete answers though.william-james88 wrote:Ironhidensh wrote:No. I'd say they are desperate to know that the Bay movies are gone and not coming back.
I can agree 100% on that but I think thats pretty nuts to think that about a film like Bee, when the main character's face has a bayverse design.
In any case, we already got confirmation from hasbro (like actual confirmation with quotes and all), that the films were moving away from the storylines set by Bay and the next film in the franchise that was building on it was cancelled.
The next film is already confirmed to be different, so the need for a reboot, or a cofirmation of one, is pretty moot.
At least that's how I see it. But seriously, if someone's idea of an actual reboot is for Bumblebee to have the same face he did before and still turn into a camaro and have a problem with his voice, then thats a pretty terrible reboot.
I think the quote or if not a quote the general vibe is that they are taking Transformers in a new direction. That could be interpreted as a new story or a new way to tell the stories. Personally I think they are going to try the stand alone movie thing again and keep focusing in smaller stories of individuals and do a little Marvel-like world building before bringing it all back together again.ZeroWolf wrote:What is the next film? Is it bee 2 or the Cybertron prequel?
Va'al wrote:Deadput wrote:Actually I don't know my mother's name is Valerie so is Va'al actually my mother?
Yes. Now go to your room and don't play with yourself.
Deadput wrote:I'll just say you can never have Megatron, Starscream, Soundwave and Shockwave together on the big screen if it's in the same continuity.
william-james88 wrote:Deadput wrote:I'll just say you can never have Megatron, Starscream, Soundwave and Shockwave together on the big screen if it's in the same continuity.
Of course you can, in a prequel film where the decepticons rise to power and take over Cybertron.
Hey, a half a dozen or so more times and he'll be the new Optimus.ZeroWolf wrote:Which I think is one of the planned films, plus really, what's death in the tf film verse (or any tf series)? Megatron has already died three times![]()
william-james88 wrote:Deadput wrote:I'll just say you can never have Megatron, Starscream, Soundwave and Shockwave together on the big screen if it's in the same continuity.
Of course you can, in a prequel film where the decepticons rise to power and take over Cybertron.
Va'al wrote:Deadput wrote:Actually I don't know my mother's name is Valerie so is Va'al actually my mother?
Yes. Now go to your room and don't play with yourself.
ZeroWolf wrote:So did anyone tell lucas that the prequel movies didn't matter before he made them? You can make that argument for any and all prequel movies. Bee is not a reboot and it doesn't need to be as it is already a good film.
Va'al wrote:Deadput wrote:Actually I don't know my mother's name is Valerie so is Va'al actually my mother?
Yes. Now go to your room and don't play with yourself.
Deadput wrote:Like if these next movies are prequels for sure then literally these movies do not matter, no amount of good writing or G1 design pandering is going to change that.
ZeroWolf wrote:Good points except that bee 2 is coming
william-james88 wrote:ZeroWolf wrote:Spain has a forty foot Mazinger Z statue (I know you're on about the states but I felt it was a good bit of triva to drop)
I wish Quebec had a giant Grandizer statue, he is our most beloved robot.
"secret message" from Bumblebee hidden
inside the store Multiple QR codes are hidden inside the store, and messages from Bumblebee flow when reading them. There are seven kinds of messages in all, and the voice of Bumblebee is the voice actor Ryohei Kimura who plays the role of Bumblebee in the movie "Bumblebee".
Return to Transformers Live Action Film Forum
Registered users: 1984forever, Bing [Bot], Bumblevivisector, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, MSN [Bot], muddyjoe, Yahoo [Bot]