peaces wrote:hasbro recently said they were going to make go-bots movies and toys. will that change anything?
Read the previous post dude.
peaces wrote:hasbro recently said they were going to make go-bots movies and toys. will that change anything?
Hasbro may own the rights to the word "GoBot", but not to the characters and likenesses of the Hanna-Barbera cartoon and Bandai's original Machine Robo molds.peaces wrote:hasbro recently said they were going to make go-bots movies and toys. will that change anything?
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
This isn't a derail. This is on the subject of people suggesting/wanting GoBot-based Generations Combiner Wars toys.Noideaforaname wrote:We JUST got off of the Harley Quinn derail, let's move this to the actual GoBots thread...
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
"They" who?ZeroWolf wrote:Depends on what they meant by go bots as they did produce a go bots transformers line a few years ago that wasn't linked to the old go bots series.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Sabrblade wrote:"They" who?ZeroWolf wrote:Depends on what they meant by go bots as they did produce a go bots transformers line a few years ago that wasn't linked to the old go bots series.
Those in this thread suggesting GoBots CW toys mean the Tonka GoBots characters of the 80s, which I tried to explain won't likely happen.
Sabrblade wrote:For those wondering why neither Hasbro, Takara, nor the Club has done GoBot redecos beyond Movie Fracture and BotCon 2007 Bug Bite, it's because they really sorta can't. Hanna-Barbera and Bandai own the GoBots characters and likenesses, preventing there from being a Transformers toy done up in the colors of a GoBot and with the name and identity of said GoBot its deco is homaging.
When e-HOBBY did their six-pack Minibot G1 GoBots redeco set, they got around the legal trouble by using prototype Transformers decos that didn't resemble any of the GoBot decos, and by not even giving the six of them names or identities. The toys were all nameless and bio-less.
BotCon 2007 Bug Bite had its deco based on the nameless e-HOBBY toy, and while Club fiction has established him as officially being the GoBot Renegade of the same name, his bio did not directly identify him as such, instead remaining ambiguous about his true nature, writing him as an enigma among his peers:Bugbite is a Decepticon shrouded in mystery. Many serving under Bludgeon are unsure as to why he gained such favor. commander of one of the finest ships within Bludgeon's army, Bugbite enjoys unusual freedom of action, often disappearing for months at a time with his eclectic crew of ne'er-do-wells on missions of which none of them ever speak. Many under his command have abandoned partners and friends without a word leading many to suspect even greater duplicity than is typical among the Decepticons.
And Movie Fracture was a very borderline case that played at least a part in TF companies' current reluctance to do any more direct GoBot homages. That figure was intended to be the GoBot Crasher, but couldn't be due to Crasher's character and likeness being owned by Hanna-Barbera and Bandai, and so became the different character of Fracture. But, its deco was still very much that of Crasher, making it walk the thin line of what TF companies could and could not do. Since then, there haven't been any more direct GoBot deco homages made, with any others being only "loose" or "indirect" homages in toys like ROTF Deadlift. But Fracture wasn't exactly an example of something that all parties felt "okay" with.
So if we ever want something like an official Transformers Cy-Kill toy, it'd either have to be in some deco that doesn't remotely resemble that of Cy-Kill, or it would have to be just a generic red and blue deco figure that isn't named "Cy-Kill", and either case's bio wouldn't be allowed to directly identify him as the GoBots Cy-Kill character. An official Transformers Cy-Kill toy that's colored like Cy-Kill, named "Cy-Kill", and identified as the GoBots Cy-Kill character cannot legally happen.
Same goes for all other GoBots.
Desslok2201 wrote:I don't want to begin the GoBots war, but I think those remembering them may be doing so with rose colored glasses. GoBots, while some of their alt forms were nice, the robots were awkward and weird, many times without distinct heads. Those who condemn Transformers G1 cartoons as terrible, dated, low quality, etc. should go take a look at Challenge of the GoBots if they really want to see a turd. There are many, many reasons why TFs have survived, and GoBots are a footnote.
ZeroWolf wrote:You mean besides more aggressive advert from Hasbro?
Desslok2201 wrote:ZeroWolf wrote:You mean besides more aggressive advert from Hasbro?
That's one, sure
ZeroWolf wrote:Desslok2201 wrote:ZeroWolf wrote:You mean besides more aggressive advert from Hasbro?
That's one, sure
I meant advertising but glad you got the gist of it
In one sense it was a classic case of business competition...Just not as bad as the first few console wars. For the life of me I can't remember who the company was that imported the machine robo line to the west (in the UK some places did sell machine robo toys but I need to check the date on them)
william-james88 wrote:Also be weary of hope in this hobby. Hope is just undiscovered disappointment.
Agamemnon, barebacked rider of flying robo-dragon, and not often constipated either...My nephew wrote:Bacon is meat candy.
Agamemnon wrote:ZeroWolf wrote:Desslok2201 wrote:ZeroWolf wrote:You mean besides more aggressive advert from Hasbro?
That's one, sure
I meant advertising but glad you got the gist of it
In one sense it was a classic case of business competition...Just not as bad as the first few console wars. For the life of me I can't remember who the company was that imported the machine robo line to the west (in the UK some places did sell machine robo toys but I need to check the date on them)
Are you talking about Tonka?
MightyMagnus78 wrote:Has anyone combined Legends Thundercracker to Ultra Primes chest yet? I've not been able to get him pegged in straight. Thanks.
JelZe GoldRabbit wrote:MightyMagnus78 wrote:Has anyone combined Legends Thundercracker to Ultra Primes chest yet? I've not been able to get him pegged in straight. Thanks.
He's not supposed to: the pegs only work with the Blackjack mold. All you can do is have him hang in there with the help of the windows.
MightyMagnus78 wrote:Has anyone combined Legends Thundercracker to Ultra Primes chest yet? I've not been able to get him pegged in straight. Thanks.
chuckdawg1999 wrote:MightyMagnus78 wrote:Has anyone combined Legends Thundercracker to Ultra Primes chest yet? I've not been able to get him pegged in straight. Thanks.
Yeah don't do this. All you'll accomplish is breaking Thundercrackers hands. I've seen a few people who've done this to Starscream and Thundercracker.
Return to Transformers Toys Discussion
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Gauntlet101010, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], MSN [Bot], SketchyPluto, Yahoo [Bot]