TFCC Runabout Renamed to Over-Run, Full Reveal Later Today
Friday, January 27th, 2012 10:51AM CST
Categories: Toy News, Collector's Club NewsPosted by: El Duque Views: 36,427
Topic Options: View Discussion · Sign in or Join to reply
The_TF_Club wrote:
"Runabout" reveal TODAY but before that want 2 give every1 a heads up. On the package he will NOT b called Runabout. Name was NOT available.
From a product standpoint we had to go with the name "Over-Run"... We could have searched out other names CLOSER to Runabout BUT thatwould have delayed us getting this guy to you all SOONER rather than later. Just all the way the schedule worked out.
News Search
Got Transformers News? Let us know here!
Most Popular Transformers News
ROTB Optimus Prime Lead Designer Discusses Why the Face Looks Similar to the 2007 Movie
58,172 viewsMost Recent Transformers News
Posted by Mkall on January 27th, 2012 @ 10:56am CST
Posted by PaxCybertron82 on January 27th, 2012 @ 11:00am CST
Posted by Guitarbot on January 27th, 2012 @ 11:00am CST
Posted by craggy on January 27th, 2012 @ 11:03am CST
Posted by Heavy B on January 27th, 2012 @ 11:09am CST
Posted by LOST Cybertronian on January 27th, 2012 @ 11:16am CST
Dr. Heavy B wrote:When can I order him. these things go quick and I will NOT be caught with my pants down, like with G2 ramjet
Next week but no specific day has been anounced. I would bet on Monday or Tuesday.
Posted by Kibble on January 27th, 2012 @ 11:24am CST
Flux Convoy wrote:...and the date is?... I don't understand why we can't be given hard dates and times for on-sale items, registration, etc. They've been doing this dance for years now, you would think they'd want to stop looking like amateurs eventually. It certainly makes it hard for me to keep defending them and I love what they do. At this point, it isn't simple frustration.
The red windows are slick. Thumbs up on that. I do look forward to getting the exclusives. Pissed at the inept fashion this stuff is handled still. We're 8 years down the road for crying out loud!
I think they do this intentionally to avoid their site crashing or being largely unusable ala HTS on SDCC exclusive day. It's an inconvenience to be sure, but as long as they're available for better than 24 hours, it's not the end of the world.
Posted by rpetras on January 27th, 2012 @ 11:26am CST
Call him what you like.
Posted by Bumblevivisector on January 27th, 2012 @ 12:05pm CST
But since this messes up the pairity of an iconic duo, I'm feeling just dickish enough about this that I'd like to be the first to posit the theory that, based on the nature of the last Over-Run rename, it was likely not so much a rights issue as a revelation that the British consider "Runabout" an offensive slur against children with hyperactivity disorder.
I know I deserve to have my TF Club account lock me out as soon as preorders open up for saying that, but thank you, won't you?
Posted by GuyIncognito on January 27th, 2012 @ 12:29pm CST
Posted by El Duque on January 27th, 2012 @ 12:45pm CST
OVER-RUN tries to pass himself off as a suave connoisseur of fine things. It’s not a façade he can really maintain for long, less because of his generally low intelligence and more because his interest in beautiful objects starts and ends with “blow them up!” His drive to seem sophisticated is in direct conflict with his enthusiastic love of explosions and action. The former is almost always on the losing side of that battle. He’s not interested in the Decepticons’ plans for conquest; he’s just with them because of the greater opportunities for his kind of fun. He’s always on the move, looking to create a bigger fireball, a larger bomb crater, and generally cram every microsecond with action.
He is partnered with the hyperactive RUNAMUCK, and has never had more fun in his life. Marginally smarter than his partner, he also has better self-control, giving the pairing just enough focus to present a real danger to most robots they gang up on.
Over-Run is a Deluxe sized figure featured in the Wings Universe and is Runamuck’s demolition partner. Over-Run utilizes one of the extremely popular “Classics” molds and features an all-new head sculpt by Dan Khanna and Paul Brooks. The toy is packed in a convention style box with a foam insert for easy removal and display.
Posted by Delicon on January 27th, 2012 @ 1:09pm CST
Posted by GetRightRobot on January 27th, 2012 @ 1:23pm CST
Posted by F Prime on January 27th, 2012 @ 1:25pm CST
Posted by Mkall on January 27th, 2012 @ 1:42pm CST
Posted by metalformer on January 27th, 2012 @ 1:49pm CST
Somebody should make custom stickers for these packages (ala ReproLabel) to "correct" these "injustices" and restore its G1 Glory!
Posted by PaxCybertron82 on January 27th, 2012 @ 2:04pm CST
Still, I can't wait for both and seems I had both as a kid, they're getting a special place on my shelf. I'm already thinking of making some tweaks to the transformation though, specifically how the "Wings" are displayed. I may leave mine down along the body, like the old "arms" that the G1 guys had.
Posted by LiKwid on January 27th, 2012 @ 2:18pm CST
Posted by cannonfodder4000 on January 27th, 2012 @ 2:25pm CST
ViperEye82 wrote:Still, I can't wait for both and seems I had both as a kid, they're getting a special place on my shelf. I'm already thinking of making some tweaks to the transformation though, specifically how the "Wings" are displayed. I may leave mine down along the body, like the old "arms" that the G1 guys had.
This one dude, Genral Tekno, he did this way cool transformation for Wheeljack that'll give you like a more accurate looking Runamuck and Runabout.
Posted by rpetras on January 27th, 2012 @ 2:36pm CST
cannonfodder4000 wrote:This one dude, Genral Tekno, he did this way cool transformation for Wheeljack that'll give you like a more accurate looking Runamuck and Runabout.
Nice work Tekno. Very nice indeed!
Posted by RiddlerJ on January 27th, 2012 @ 2:41pm CST
Still undecided on SG Drift. I'm not into the whole SG thing But I would repurpose him as Turbo or Lightspeed. Unfortunately, the Japanese deco makes that hard to do.
Posted by Mkall on January 27th, 2012 @ 3:24pm CST
RiddlerJ wrote:Definately getting this guy.
Still undecided on SG Drift. I'm not into the whole SG thing But I would repurpose him as Turbo or Lightspeed. Unfortunately, the Japanese deco makes that hard to do.
There's always W.A.R.S.
Great... now I'm tempted to get two
Posted by RiddlerJ on January 27th, 2012 @ 3:46pm CST
Mkall wrote:RiddlerJ wrote:Definately getting this guy.
Still undecided on SG Drift. I'm not into the whole SG thing But I would repurpose him as Turbo or Lightspeed. Unfortunately, the Japanese deco makes that hard to do.
There's always W.A.R.S.
Great... now I'm tempted to get two
Ah, now you're talkin'.
Posted by BeastProwl on January 27th, 2012 @ 4:38pm CST
They should have named him "Classics Michael Bay"
Posted by Blackstreak on January 27th, 2012 @ 4:54pm CST
Posted by Jelze Bunnycat on January 27th, 2012 @ 5:01pm CST
Blackstreak wrote:What kind of scheduling is there to hinder naming something what it should be named? I just don't get it. I'd still get him and use the name Runabout.
Trademarks have to be registered first, then Hasbro needs to file reports on usage. All of that takes time, but reporting usage of a name already in possession is quickly done.
Also, registering new names costs quite a bit of money, so again Hasbro has made it a sport to re-use names they already have. "Breakaway" instead of "Getaway" and "Over-Run" instead of "Spastic" come to mind.
Posted by Midnight_Fox on January 27th, 2012 @ 5:22pm CST
JelZe GoldRabbit wrote:Trademarks have to be registered first,
Actually, in America, they don't. Unregistered Trademarks relating to a specific context is protectable in US Courts. Please note the bolded statement in the below quote.
At least according to several lawyers commenting on the Intellectual Property Case Games Workshop has brought against Chapterhouse Studios:
"
You can get trademark protection for certain words that are in common use (for example, Apple) if there's little relation to the actual product being produced (computers). But if the word is generic or merely descriptive of the good being sold then you can't get protection.
Trademarks can be (in decreasing order of protection):
Fanciful (EXXON for oil company)
Arbitrary (APPLE for computers)
Suggestive (MICROSOFT for microprocessor software)
Descriptive (SHARP for copiers)
Generic (MINIATURE for miniatures games)
Generic marks can never be protected, descriptive marks can only be protected to the extent they've developed secondary meaning. So while "Games Workshop" might be descriptive (for example; although GW would probably argue that the mark is suggestive), it has developed secondary meaning in the market beyond its literal meaning. Therefore, the term is protected.
What GW is (probably) going to argue is that the words described above are "Descriptive" and have developed secondary meaning on their own. CH will say that those terms are merely generic, or have not developed secondary meaning, and therefore not protected.
In terms of legitimacy, there's little difference between registered and unregistered trademarks (registered trademarks just go through this process before the USPTO rather than waiting for a court to make the determination) "
Essentially, just because you haven't registered a trademark, doesn't mean you don't own it.
Posted by Jelze Bunnycat on January 27th, 2012 @ 5:29pm CST
Midnight_Fox wrote:JelZe GoldRabbit wrote:Trademarks have to be registered first,
Actually, in America, they don't. Unregistered Trademarks relating to a specific context is protectable in US Courts.
At least according to several lawyers commenting on the Intellectual Property Case Games Workshop has brought against Chapterhouse Studios.
Well, registered as in that the Trademark Office knows such and such company has the rights to such and such name in such and such area.
Posted by Midnight_Fox on January 27th, 2012 @ 5:35pm CST
JelZe GoldRabbit wrote:Midnight_Fox wrote:JelZe GoldRabbit wrote:Trademarks have to be registered first,
Actually, in America, they don't. Unregistered Trademarks relating to a specific context is protectable in US Courts.
At least according to several lawyers commenting on the Intellectual Property Case Games Workshop has brought against Chapterhouse Studios.
Well, registered as in that the Trademark Office knows such and such company has the rights to such and such name in such and such area.
Interestingly, according to the TFCC Magazine covers, Transformers itself is an unregistered Trademark(notified by the TM, a registered Trademark has the R in a circle marking).
In fact, if you go through your products, you'd be surprised how often these AREN'T registered trademarks with the USPTO.
The name Hasbro itself, however, DOES have a registered Trademark symbol.
Posted by Rated X on January 27th, 2012 @ 8:29pm CST
metalformer wrote:*Sigh*
Somebody should make custom stickers for these packages (ala ReproLabel) to "correct" these "injustices" and restore its G1 Glory!
Reprolabels for a box ??? Are you serious ??? (no offense)
I already got a nice place in my closet picked out for Runabout’s box. And yes I said “Runabout”.
It’s s**t like this that proves just how stupid copyrights really are under certain circumstances. Hasbro doesn’t even own the rights to the names of characters they created ??? WTF ??? There should be a law that a copyright has to be renewed every 5 years or it expires and is free for the taking. This would keep the names belonging to legitimate businesses and not copyright hoarders who buy rights when a franchise is about to go bankrupt. Does anyone know where the owner of the name “Runabout” is right now ??? He might be living under a highway sipping a bottle of cheap booze…
Posted by gavinfuzzy on January 27th, 2012 @ 9:05pm CST
Rated X wrote:metalformer wrote:*Sigh*
Somebody should make custom stickers for these packages (ala ReproLabel) to "correct" these "injustices" and restore its G1 Glory!
Reprolabels for a box ??? Are you serious ??? (no offense)
I already got a nice place in my closet picked out for Runabout’s box. And yes I said “Runabout”.
It’s s**t like this that proves just how stupid copyrights really are under certain circumstances. Hasbro doesn’t even own the rights to the names of characters they created ??? WTF ??? There should be a law that a copyright has to be renewed every 5 years or it expires and is free for the taking. This would keep the names belonging to legitimate businesses and not copyright hoarders who buy rights when a franchise is about to go bankrupt. Does anyone know where the owner of the name “Runabout” is right now ??? He might be living under a highway sipping a bottle of cheap booze…
Yeah, copyright for stuff expires after time. Also, runabout seems a too generic name. Now you cant copyright too generic terms... like Jazz, or Ratchet, and Brawl.
So hasbro has to go with an alternative... although, they should have just done "Decepticon Runabout".
Posted by gavinfuzzy on January 27th, 2012 @ 9:09pm CST
JelZe GoldRabbit wrote:Trademarks have to be registered first, then Hasbro needs to file reports on usage. All of that takes time, but reporting usage of a name already in possession is quickly done.
Also, registering new names costs quite a bit of money, so again Hasbro has made it a sport to re-use names they already have. "Breakaway" instead of "Getaway" and "Over-Run" instead of "Spastic" come to mind.
Spastic actually made the copyright. The boxes here still say "Spastic". The change with Over-Run was due to some people finding "spastic" offensive, so hasbro printed new stickers for the packaging to cover up the existing name .
Posted by Rated X on January 27th, 2012 @ 10:28pm CST
gavinfuzzy wrote:JelZe GoldRabbit wrote:Trademarks have to be registered first, then Hasbro needs to file reports on usage. All of that takes time, but reporting usage of a name already in possession is quickly done.
Also, registering new names costs quite a bit of money, so again Hasbro has made it a sport to re-use names they already have. "Breakaway" instead of "Getaway" and "Over-Run" instead of "Spastic" come to mind.
Spastic actually made the copyright. The boxes here still say "Spastic". The change with Over-Run was due to some people finding "spastic" offensive, so hasbro printed new stickers for the packaging to cover up the existing name .
Damn, I never found Spastic. I wanted him just for the box to put it next to my HA Jazz with tobacco and gambling being advertised in the background.
That whole spastic thread was bluddy funny !!!
Posted by Midnight_Fox on January 27th, 2012 @ 10:58pm CST
Rated X wrote:
It’s s**t like this that proves just how stupid copyrights really are under certain circumstances. Hasbro doesn’t even own the rights to the names of characters they created ??? WTF ??? There should be a law that a copyright has to be renewed every 5 years or it expires and is free for the taking. This would keep the names belonging to legitimate businesses and not copyright hoarders who buy rights when a franchise is about to go bankrupt. Does anyone know where the owner of the name “Runabout” is right now ??? He might be living under a highway sipping a bottle of cheap booze…
Just to be clear: Copyright is NOT the same as Trademarks. A rant on Copyright doesn't apply here.
Trademarks protect signs or indicators(such as a name) that identifies products or services.
Copyright protects THINGS(such as an actual figure by protecting the rights to reproduce it exactly or a book by protecting the exact words and rights to reproduce it).
Runabout as a name falls under trademark, NOT copyright.
Trademarks MUST be lawfully used to be retained. If not actively used, it will be lost(usually after 5 years). If Hasbro doesn't have the trademark, it's their own fault for not using it for x number of years.
Posted by Rated X on January 28th, 2012 @ 3:58am CST
Midnight_Fox wrote:Rated X wrote:
It’s s**t like this that proves just how stupid copyrights really are under certain circumstances. Hasbro doesn’t even own the rights to the names of characters they created ??? WTF ??? There should be a law that a copyright has to be renewed every 5 years or it expires and is free for the taking. This would keep the names belonging to legitimate businesses and not copyright hoarders who buy rights when a franchise is about to go bankrupt. Does anyone know where the owner of the name “Runabout” is right now ??? He might be living under a highway sipping a bottle of cheap booze…
Just to be clear: Copyright is NOT the same as Trademarks. A rant on Copyright doesn't apply here.
Trademarks protect signs or indicators(such as a name) that identifies products or services.
Copyright protects THINGS(such as an actual figure by protecting the rights to reproduce it exactly or a book by protecting the exact words and rights to reproduce it).
Runabout as a name falls under trademark, NOT copyright.
Trademarks MUST be lawfully used to be retained. If not actively used, it will be lost(usually after 5 years). If Hasbro doesn't have the trademark, it's their own fault for not using it for x number of years.
Well if that’s the case, take my last post and remove the word “copyright” and replace it with the word “trademark”. Then re-read it.
I’m not trying to be rude, but the correct terminology is not my focus. I’m focusing on the concept that the name “Runabout” is 25 years old and it doesn’t matter who uses it now unless they are using it for another transformable robot. If the new “trademark” holder is using the name “Runabout” for a vacuum cleaner, there should be no case in any court of law. The reason being that nobody is going to mistake a vacuum cleaner for a transformable robot therefore neither company can claim damages. Case dismissed.
All this other legal drama is a bunch of BS.
Posted by gavinfuzzy on January 28th, 2012 @ 7:21am CST
Posted by Midnight_Fox on January 28th, 2012 @ 9:51am CST
Rated X wrote:
Well if that’s the case, take my last post and remove the word “copyright” and replace it with the word “trademark”. Then re-read it.
I’m not trying to be rude, but the correct terminology is not my focus. I’m focusing on the concept that the name “Runabout” is 25 years old and it doesn’t matter who uses it now unless they are using it for another transformable robot. If the new “trademark” holder is using the name “Runabout” for a vacuum cleaner, there should be no case in any court of law. The reason being that nobody is going to mistake a vacuum cleaner for a transformable robot therefore neither company can claim damages. Case dismissed.
All this other legal drama is a bunch of BS.
Actually, it doesn't need to be about a transformable robot, but could simply be about a toy car named Runabout. Please read my previous post which outlines how Trademarks can be a applied.
Trademarks don't care how something was used in the past, as they have to be used currently to apply. Again, if the name was unavailable, it's Hasbro's fault, NOT the laws regarding Trademark.
If fact, you had this in your post: " There should be a law that a copyright has to be renewed every 5 years or it expires and is free for the taking."
And there IS a law like that regarding Trademarks, as I said in my previous post.
Posted by metaphorge on January 28th, 2012 @ 2:40pm CST
*snort*Bumblevivisector wrote:But since this messes up the pairity of an iconic duo, I'm feeling just dickish enough about this that I'd like to be the first to posit the theory that, based on the nature of the last Over-Run rename, it was likely not so much a rights issue as a revelation that the British consider "Runabout" an offensive slur against children with hyperactivity disorder.
I know I deserve to have my TF Club account lock me out as soon as preorders open up for saying that, but thank you, won't you?
I think we should come up with some group to use "Megatron" as an offensive slur towards. Maybe people who wrecklessly attempt to circumvent trademark or copyright laws?
As for "Over-run," I think I'll call mine "Banksy."
Posted by blackout446 on January 28th, 2012 @ 7:00pm CST
Posted by El Duque on January 28th, 2012 @ 11:01pm CST
Remember, to get the incentive figure Runamuck for free you must have an active TFCC membership by March 16th. As previously stated pre-orders for his partner in crime Over-Run and their other 2012 exclusive Shattered Glass Drift will open early next week. Speaking of Shattered Glass Drift they also tweeted we can expect his full reveal on Monday.
Posted by AutobotCliffjumper on January 28th, 2012 @ 11:31pm CST
Posted by Rated X on January 29th, 2012 @ 12:06am CST
Posted by LiKwid on January 29th, 2012 @ 1:04am CST
Posted by DMSL on January 29th, 2012 @ 2:58am CST
Posted by cannonfodder4000 on January 29th, 2012 @ 4:51am CST
DMSL wrote:Can't wait to get these. I do wish the rubsigns weren't there though. Just s painted on symbol would've sufficed.
Actually both the symbols and the rubsigns are there cause that's what the G1 toys did, you can probably remove the rubsigns if you don't like'em.
Posted by freaky777 on January 29th, 2012 @ 6:34am CST
Posted by DecepticonFinishline on January 29th, 2012 @ 8:55am CST
Posted by Andrius on January 29th, 2012 @ 10:14am CST
Do we know what the production run on these are? More significantly, do we know if it's equal for both?
Posted by Stormrider on January 29th, 2012 @ 3:21pm CST
LiKwid wrote:I think just 1 per member at first is ok but I hope to be able to get at least 2 of each. I like to have 1 open and 1 MISB.. Im thinking the limit will be 4 though..Seems like that was the number during last years exclusive run..
So how do we go about getting a second Runamuck if it's the freebee? Can we order a second at the same time? And how does it work for ordering Runabout and SF Drift? Do I need to watch the computer and wait for the club to announce the open sale, and lounge at placing the order?
Posted by Laserwave13 on January 29th, 2012 @ 4:31pm CST
Reminds me to renew my membership on time. Want all three of this years figures!
Hope they do a better QC than on last years Sideburn.
(don´t know when or were exactly but i think i´ve read something about that even the figures you have to buy will also come just bagged and not boxed anymore, is there something to it or not??)