misfire19d wrote:Transformers creating new Transformers through some type of "cyber-coitus"? Ugh. Gross. The cringe potential for this is stratospheric.
misfire19d wrote:Transformers creating new Transformers through some type of "cyber-coitus"? Ugh. Gross. The cringe potential for this is stratospheric.
Aaannnd Arcee and other fembots are an example of how Hasbro tried to expand the Transformers line to sell toys to girls.
AllNewSuperRobot wrote:Not necessarily. He is the leader of the Autobots. The End. That doesn't really require explanation or exposition.
Galactic Prime wrote:misfire19d wrote:Transformers creating new Transformers through some type of "cyber-coitus"? Ugh. Gross. The cringe potential for this is stratospheric.
Aaannnd Arcee and other fembots are an example of how Hasbro tried to expand the Transformers line to sell toys to girls.
No one said anything about robot sex did they? No. I said that two Transformers would require to each participate in the creation of a new spark for a new Transformer. Sex doesn't have to be involved, especially since they don't have sex organs. But it could be that they are each required to imbue a new protoform with a fraction of their spark, thus a new Transformer requires a piece of spark from BOTH a male TF and a Female TF.
ZeroWolf wrote:Weren't you the one who wanted to give the fembots a purpose?
ZeroWolf wrote:Also what about when cybertron is a husk? How will the sides replenish their sides?
ZeroWolf wrote:Heck they could use both and ask questions like is doing it via vector sigma better for them or is vector sigma a controlling influence, set up by forces unknown to enslave the cybertron race. There's potential there
Daniel Adkins wrote:
Return to Transformers Cartoons and Comics Forum
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Bumblevivisector, DinobotPrime425, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Jelze Bunnycat, Yahoo [Bot]