Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store














Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.
Insurgent wrote:sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:You said Troy crashed the ship 3 times but I only remember 2.......where was the 3rd?????????
The episode Disaster.
Generations.
Nemesis.
Okay, I know the helm was offline in Generations, and she was ordered to ram the ship in Nemesis, but it's just a little running joke I like that Troi crashes the ship everytime she drives it.
As for the whole Enterprprise A thing, I always figured the A was one of the last Constitution class ships that were under construction and they decided to rename it the A in honour of Kirk and the amount of times the original Enterprise had saved the day. It was decomishioned after only seven years because the technology in it had become obsolete due to the new Excelsior class becomming commonplace now, and having the flagship as such an old thing was not a very good public image. Perhaps they always intended for the next Enterprise to be an Excelsior class, but as the Excelsior itself was in the final testing phases, they just gave Kirk the old design until the new one was ready.
As for the NX, I always thought it was a bit weird how the suposadly inferior ship in terms of tech looked more advanced than Kirks LEGO brick bridge. The buttons did look like LEGO bricks when viewed from a wide shot.
Insurgent wrote:sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:You said Troy crashed the ship 3 times but I only remember 2.......where was the 3rd?????????
The episode Disaster.
Generations.
Nemesis.
Okay, I know the helm was offline in Generations, and she was ordered to ram the ship in Nemesis, but it's just a little running joke I like that Troi crashes the ship everytime she drives it..
Insurgent wrote:As for the whole Enterprprise A thing, I always figured the A was one of the last Constitution class ships that were under construction and they decided to rename it the A in honour of Kirk and the amount of times the original Enterprise had saved the day. It was decomishioned after only seven years because the technology in it had become obsolete due to the new Excelsior class becomming commonplace now, and having the flagship as such an old thing was not a very good public image. Perhaps they always intended for the next Enterprise to be an Excelsior class, but as the Excelsior itself was in the final testing phases, they just gave Kirk the old design until the new one was ready..
Insurgent wrote:As for the NX, I always thought it was a bit weird how the suposadly inferior ship in terms of tech looked more advanced than Kirks LEGO brick bridge. The buttons did look like LEGO bricks when viewed from a wide shot.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
Wheeljack35 wrote:I think I had read in the Encyclopedia that the Enterprise "A" was a starship by the name of Ti Ho that was renamed
I just didn't understand why in Star Trek 3 they thought the Enterprise was too old after is had gone a major refit only a few years before
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
OptimusN1701 wrote:Hmm, then I guess the idea that it was just undergoing a massive repair jib makes the most sense to me now
Still though, the possibility of it being a new ship that was operational, but had not undergone a shakedown is possible. If I recall Kirk took her on a shakedown and had to limp it back to spacedock because there were major problems though
This would all be so much easier if we were given a timeframe for Kirks return, the trial, and him getting command of the A.
It all seems to take place in the course of a couple of weeks
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
OptimusN1701 wrote:The Encyclopedia entry you posted said that Scotty was performing shakedown tests and installing systems for an indeterminate amount of time within that year
To me it doesnt make sense to put it through shakedowns and install additional equipment(Which could have been a retrofit I'll admit) on an existing vessel. The ship seemed fairly operational at the end of ST 4, and suffering major malfunctions seems more likely of a new untested shipb
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:OptimusN1701 wrote:The Encyclopedia entry you posted said that Scotty was performing shakedown tests and installing systems for an indeterminate amount of time within that year
To me it doesnt make sense to put it through shakedowns and install additional equipment(Which could have been a retrofit I'll admit) on an existing vessel. The ship seemed fairly operational at the end of ST 4, and suffering major malfunctions seems more likely of a new untested shipb
Remember the Yorktown was heavly damaged by the probe......the ships engineir had to gut all systems to make a solor sail just to keep them alive.....even the Kligons LOST a few ships from the probe.And we dont know how much time past after the returned from 1986 and the renaming of the ship.But I would guess it was no longer then 2 or 3 weeks,due to the fact that they wanted to put an end to the Klingon Ambasssador bikering and wanted to thank Kirk and his crew prometly.
I doubt that with all of earths power systems down,and every ship and station that the probe passed by disabled that Star Fleet had the time or the manpower to comit to a full repair job on the Yorktown.
And the script for ST5 claims that just after the Enterprise A entered warp at the end of ST4 the ship started to malfunction.
OptimusN1701 wrote:sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:OptimusN1701 wrote:The Encyclopedia entry you posted said that Scotty was performing shakedown tests and installing systems for an indeterminate amount of time within that year
To me it doesnt make sense to put it through shakedowns and install additional equipment(Which could have been a retrofit I'll admit) on an existing vessel. The ship seemed fairly operational at the end of ST 4, and suffering major malfunctions seems more likely of a new untested shipb
Remember the Yorktown was heavly damaged by the probe......the ships engineir had to gut all systems to make a solor sail just to keep them alive.....even the Kligons LOST a few ships from the probe.And we dont know how much time past after the returned from 1986 and the renaming of the ship.But I would guess it was no longer then 2 or 3 weeks,due to the fact that they wanted to put an end to the Klingon Ambasssador bikering and wanted to thank Kirk and his crew prometly.
I doubt that with all of earths power systems down,and every ship and station that the probe passed by disabled that Star Fleet had the time or the manpower to comit to a full repair job on the Yorktown.
And the script for ST5 claims that just after the Enterprise A entered warp at the end of ST4 the ship started to malfunction.
And I wondered why the Klingons referred to the first Enterprise as garbage in TOS
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:OptimusN1701 wrote:sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:OptimusN1701 wrote:The Encyclopedia entry you posted said that Scotty was performing shakedown tests and installing systems for an indeterminate amount of time within that year
To me it doesnt make sense to put it through shakedowns and install additional equipment(Which could have been a retrofit I'll admit) on an existing vessel. The ship seemed fairly operational at the end of ST 4, and suffering major malfunctions seems more likely of a new untested shipb
Remember the Yorktown was heavly damaged by the probe......the ships engineir had to gut all systems to make a solor sail just to keep them alive.....even the Kligons LOST a few ships from the probe.And we dont know how much time past after the returned from 1986 and the renaming of the ship.But I would guess it was no longer then 2 or 3 weeks,due to the fact that they wanted to put an end to the Klingon Ambasssador bikering and wanted to thank Kirk and his crew prometly.
I doubt that with all of earths power systems down,and every ship and station that the probe passed by disabled that Star Fleet had the time or the manpower to comit to a full repair job on the Yorktown.
And the script for ST5 claims that just after the Enterprise A entered warp at the end of ST4 the ship started to malfunction.
And I wondered why the Klingons referred to the first Enterprise as garbage in TOS
HAHA![]()
An other reason to believe that it was an older ship that was malfunctioning was that the A had all touch-interfaces in St5. The problems could be linked to the fact that the ships systems were not designed to work with all touch-interfaces.
By ST6 some of the consoles on the bridge were fitted with physical dials and gauges.
OptimusN1701 wrote:sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:OptimusN1701 wrote:sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:OptimusN1701 wrote:The Encyclopedia entry you posted said that Scotty was performing shakedown tests and installing systems for an indeterminate amount of time within that year
To me it doesnt make sense to put it through shakedowns and install additional equipment(Which could have been a retrofit I'll admit) on an existing vessel. The ship seemed fairly operational at the end of ST 4, and suffering major malfunctions seems more likely of a new untested shipb
Remember the Yorktown was heavly damaged by the probe......the ships engineir had to gut all systems to make a solor sail just to keep them alive.....even the Kligons LOST a few ships from the probe.And we dont know how much time past after the returned from 1986 and the renaming of the ship.But I would guess it was no longer then 2 or 3 weeks,due to the fact that they wanted to put an end to the Klingon Ambasssador bikering and wanted to thank Kirk and his crew prometly.
I doubt that with all of earths power systems down,and every ship and station that the probe passed by disabled that Star Fleet had the time or the manpower to comit to a full repair job on the Yorktown.
And the script for ST5 claims that just after the Enterprise A entered warp at the end of ST4 the ship started to malfunction.
And I wondered why the Klingons referred to the first Enterprise as garbage in TOS
HAHA![]()
An other reason to believe that it was an older ship that was malfunctioning was that the A had all touch-interfaces in St5. The problems could be linked to the fact that the ships systems were not designed to work with all touch-interfaces.
By ST6 some of the consoles on the bridge were fitted with physical dials and gauges.
On Memory Alpha it says that this was done because that's just what the director wanted, but it makes a good explanation.
A very good explanation indeed.
I think we should just agree that she was a great ship
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
Moonbase2 wrote:I've been squeezed out of the thread because I don't know squat about the ships!![]()
Perhaps I can BS my way thru....eh, maybe not.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:OptimusN1701 wrote:sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:OptimusN1701 wrote:sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:OptimusN1701 wrote:The Encyclopedia entry you posted said that Scotty was performing shakedown tests and installing systems for an indeterminate amount of time within that year
To me it doesnt make sense to put it through shakedowns and install additional equipment(Which could have been a retrofit I'll admit) on an existing vessel. The ship seemed fairly operational at the end of ST 4, and suffering major malfunctions seems more likely of a new untested shipb
Remember the Yorktown was heavly damaged by the probe......the ships engineir had to gut all systems to make a solor sail just to keep them alive.....even the Kligons LOST a few ships from the probe.And we dont know how much time past after the returned from 1986 and the renaming of the ship.But I would guess it was no longer then 2 or 3 weeks,due to the fact that they wanted to put an end to the Klingon Ambasssador bikering and wanted to thank Kirk and his crew prometly.
I doubt that with all of earths power systems down,and every ship and station that the probe passed by disabled that Star Fleet had the time or the manpower to comit to a full repair job on the Yorktown.
And the script for ST5 claims that just after the Enterprise A entered warp at the end of ST4 the ship started to malfunction.
And I wondered why the Klingons referred to the first Enterprise as garbage in TOS
HAHA![]()
An other reason to believe that it was an older ship that was malfunctioning was that the A had all touch-interfaces in St5. The problems could be linked to the fact that the ships systems were not designed to work with all touch-interfaces.
By ST6 some of the consoles on the bridge were fitted with physical dials and gauges.
On Memory Alpha it says that this was done because that's just what the director wanted, but it makes a good explanation.
A very good explanation indeed.
I think we should just agree that she was a great ship
Thats fine......I was just having fun talking Trek with someone who knows what I'm talking about.
OptimusN1701 wrote:It's pretty much over
I see Sto_'s point
Now lets talk about the weapons
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:OptimusN1701 wrote:It's pretty much over
I see Sto_'s point
Now lets talk about the weapons
Like???????????
OptimusN1701 wrote:sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:OptimusN1701 wrote:It's pretty much over
I see Sto_'s point
Now lets talk about the weapons
Like???????????
Ur favorite Phaser design? idk i just kinda threw it out there
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
OptimusN1701 wrote:yea, handhelds
Mine are the ST 5-6 Type 2 and the Type 3 rifle from First Contact
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:OptimusN1701 wrote:yea, handhelds
Mine are the ST 5-6 Type 2 and the Type 3 rifle from First Contact
Those were a throw back design to TOS
OptimusN1701 wrote:sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:OptimusN1701 wrote:yea, handhelds
Mine are the ST 5-6 Type 2 and the Type 3 rifle from First Contact
Those were a throw back design to TOS
The ones from search for spock and voyage home were
These ones were black and looked more gun-like
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds
T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Bumblevivisector, Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, megatran, MSN [Bot], MSNbot Media, Riot Riverman, Yahoo [Bot]