>
shop.seibertron.com amazon.seibertron.com Facebook Twitter X YouTube Pinterest Instagram Myspace LinkedIn Patreon Podcast RSS
This page runs on affiliate links — your clicks may earn us a few Shanix. Want the full transmission? Roll out to our Affiliate Disclosure.

New Star Trek Thread!

Welcome to the General Discussion area where just about anything goes! This area is designed to discuss all matters and does not necessarily have to be Transformers related. Please keep topics relevant.

Postby OptimusN1701 » Sun Sep 30, 2007 11:50 am

Insurgent wrote:
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:You said Troy crashed the ship 3 times but I only remember 2.......where was the 3rd?????????


The episode Disaster.
Generations.
Nemesis.

Okay, I know the helm was offline in Generations, and she was ordered to ram the ship in Nemesis, but it's just a little running joke I like that Troi crashes the ship everytime she drives it.


As for the whole Enterprprise A thing, I always figured the A was one of the last Constitution class ships that were under construction and they decided to rename it the A in honour of Kirk and the amount of times the original Enterprise had saved the day. It was decomishioned after only seven years because the technology in it had become obsolete due to the new Excelsior class becomming commonplace now, and having the flagship as such an old thing was not a very good public image. Perhaps they always intended for the next Enterprise to be an Excelsior class, but as the Excelsior itself was in the final testing phases, they just gave Kirk the old design until the new one was ready.

As for the NX, I always thought it was a bit weird how the suposadly inferior ship in terms of tech looked more advanced than Kirks LEGO brick bridge. The buttons did look like LEGO bricks when viewed from a wide shot.


Yay! someone who agrees with me :-P

Although the NX does look like an upside down Akira, it is heavily modified from that design, The secondary hull and saucer impulse engines are gone. the deflector dish is where the supposed forward shuttlebay on the akira was and theres more but i gotta get to work, so i'll be back in 8 1/2 hours
Image
OptimusN1701
Headmaster Jr
Posts: 510
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 3:33 pm

Postby Wheeljack35 » Sun Sep 30, 2007 1:41 pm

I think I had read in the Encyclopedia that the Enterprise "A" was a starship by the name of Ti Ho that was renamed

I just didn't understand why in Star Trek 3 they thought the Enterprise was too old after is had gone a major refit only a few years before
Image
Wheeljack35
City Commander
Posts: 3690
News Credits: 26
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2004 3:11 pm
Location: New Port Richey Fl
Watch Wheeljack35 on YouTube

Postby sto_vo_kor_2000 » Sun Sep 30, 2007 3:27 pm

Motto: "Today is a good day to die......but the day is not yet over!"
Insurgent wrote:
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:You said Troy crashed the ship 3 times but I only remember 2.......where was the 3rd?????????


The episode Disaster.
Generations.
Nemesis.

Okay, I know the helm was offline in Generations, and she was ordered to ram the ship in Nemesis, but it's just a little running joke I like that Troi crashes the ship everytime she drives it..

Its been a long time since I've seen that episode but I dont think she was driving, She want even in command at the time of the crash,She asumed command after because she was the highest ranking officer at the time.

Insurgent wrote:As for the whole Enterprprise A thing, I always figured the A was one of the last Constitution class ships that were under construction and they decided to rename it the A in honour of Kirk and the amount of times the original Enterprise had saved the day. It was decomishioned after only seven years because the technology in it had become obsolete due to the new Excelsior class becomming commonplace now, and having the flagship as such an old thing was not a very good public image. Perhaps they always intended for the next Enterprise to be an Excelsior class, but as the Excelsior itself was in the final testing phases, they just gave Kirk the old design until the new one was ready..

But why would an other Constitution class ship named Yorktown be under construction when there was already one of the same class in service??????

Insurgent wrote:As for the NX, I always thought it was a bit weird how the suposadly inferior ship in terms of tech looked more advanced than Kirks LEGO brick bridge. The buttons did look like LEGO bricks when viewed from a wide shot.


LEGO Star Trek b,kool 8)
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds

T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach

Image
sto_vo_kor_2000
Guardian Of Seibertron
Posts: 6888
News Credits: 1
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 1:01 am

Postby sto_vo_kor_2000 » Sun Sep 30, 2007 3:40 pm

Motto: "Today is a good day to die......but the day is not yet over!"
Wheeljack35 wrote:I think I had read in the Encyclopedia that the Enterprise "A" was a starship by the name of Ti Ho that was renamed

I just didn't understand why in Star Trek 3 they thought the Enterprise was too old after is had gone a major refit only a few years before


I posted scans from the ST Encyclopedia earlyer....according to the book ,and if you can trust Gene Rodenberry,The Enterprise A was a rename of the Yorktown....wether or not it is the same Yorktown that was already in service is the real question.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds

T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach

Image
sto_vo_kor_2000
Guardian Of Seibertron
Posts: 6888
News Credits: 1
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 1:01 am

Postby sto_vo_kor_2000 » Sun Sep 30, 2007 4:10 pm

Motto: "Today is a good day to die......but the day is not yet over!"
Well I search my closet of Star Trek books for some thing to end the debate of weter or not the Enterprise A was a new ship or not and I found it.........that is if you are inclined to believe Paramont.The put out a series of Star Trek magazine's back in 1999 and as far as I'm conserned its offical.Here are some scans that I had to pease together because it didnt fit in my scanner.

Image

Image

Now it doesnt say witch ship it was but it says that it was already in service so that means its not a newly built ship.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds

T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach

Image
sto_vo_kor_2000
Guardian Of Seibertron
Posts: 6888
News Credits: 1
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 1:01 am

Postby sto_vo_kor_2000 » Sun Sep 30, 2007 4:17 pm

Motto: "Today is a good day to die......but the day is not yet over!"
A closer look.

Image
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds

T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach

Image
sto_vo_kor_2000
Guardian Of Seibertron
Posts: 6888
News Credits: 1
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 1:01 am

Postby OptimusN1701 » Sun Sep 30, 2007 9:08 pm

Hmm, then I guess the idea that it was just undergoing a massive repair jib makes the most sense to me now

Still though, the possibility of it being a new ship that was operational, but had not undergone a shakedown is possible. If I recall Kirk took her on a shakedown and had to limp it back to spacedock because there were major problems though

This would all be so much easier if we were given a timeframe for Kirks return, the trial, and him getting command of the A.

It all seems to take place in the course of a couple of weeks
Image
OptimusN1701
Headmaster Jr
Posts: 510
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 3:33 pm

Postby sto_vo_kor_2000 » Sun Sep 30, 2007 9:46 pm

Motto: "Today is a good day to die......but the day is not yet over!"
OptimusN1701 wrote:Hmm, then I guess the idea that it was just undergoing a massive repair jib makes the most sense to me now

Still though, the possibility of it being a new ship that was operational, but had not undergone a shakedown is possible. If I recall Kirk took her on a shakedown and had to limp it back to spacedock because there were major problems though

This would all be so much easier if we were given a timeframe for Kirks return, the trial, and him getting command of the A.

It all seems to take place in the course of a couple of weeks


According to the Encyclopedia Star Trek 4 was in the year 2286 and ST5 was in the year 2287 but it doesnt say in what months......so its hard to tell just how long it really was.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds

T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach

Image
sto_vo_kor_2000
Guardian Of Seibertron
Posts: 6888
News Credits: 1
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 1:01 am

Postby OptimusN1701 » Sun Sep 30, 2007 9:57 pm

The Encyclopedia entry you posted said that Scotty was performing shakedown tests and installing systems for an indeterminate amount of time within that year

To me it doesnt make sense to put it through shakedowns and install additional equipment(Which could have been a retrofit I'll admit) on an existing vessel. The ship seemed fairly operational at the end of ST 4, and suffering major malfunctions seems more likely of a new untested shipb
Image
OptimusN1701
Headmaster Jr
Posts: 510
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 3:33 pm

Postby sto_vo_kor_2000 » Sun Sep 30, 2007 10:13 pm

Motto: "Today is a good day to die......but the day is not yet over!"
OptimusN1701 wrote:The Encyclopedia entry you posted said that Scotty was performing shakedown tests and installing systems for an indeterminate amount of time within that year

To me it doesnt make sense to put it through shakedowns and install additional equipment(Which could have been a retrofit I'll admit) on an existing vessel. The ship seemed fairly operational at the end of ST 4, and suffering major malfunctions seems more likely of a new untested shipb


Remember the Yorktown was heavly damaged by the probe......the ships engineir had to gut all systems to make a solor sail just to keep them alive.....even the Kligons LOST a few ships from the probe.And we dont know how much time past after the returned from 1986 and the renaming of the ship.But I would guess it was no longer then 2 or 3 weeks,due to the fact that they wanted to put an end to the Klingon Ambasssador bikering and wanted to thank Kirk and his crew prometly.
I doubt that with all of earths power systems down,and every ship and station that the probe passed by disabled that Star Fleet had the time or the manpower to comit to a full repair job on the Yorktown.
And the script for ST5 claims that just after the Enterprise A entered warp at the end of ST4 the ship started to malfunction.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds

T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach

Image
sto_vo_kor_2000
Guardian Of Seibertron
Posts: 6888
News Credits: 1
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 1:01 am

Postby OptimusN1701 » Sun Sep 30, 2007 10:15 pm

sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:
OptimusN1701 wrote:The Encyclopedia entry you posted said that Scotty was performing shakedown tests and installing systems for an indeterminate amount of time within that year

To me it doesnt make sense to put it through shakedowns and install additional equipment(Which could have been a retrofit I'll admit) on an existing vessel. The ship seemed fairly operational at the end of ST 4, and suffering major malfunctions seems more likely of a new untested shipb


Remember the Yorktown was heavly damaged by the probe......the ships engineir had to gut all systems to make a solor sail just to keep them alive.....even the Kligons LOST a few ships from the probe.And we dont know how much time past after the returned from 1986 and the renaming of the ship.But I would guess it was no longer then 2 or 3 weeks,due to the fact that they wanted to put an end to the Klingon Ambasssador bikering and wanted to thank Kirk and his crew prometly.
I doubt that with all of earths power systems down,and every ship and station that the probe passed by disabled that Star Fleet had the time or the manpower to comit to a full repair job on the Yorktown.
And the script for ST5 claims that just after the Enterprise A entered warp at the end of ST4 the ship started to malfunction.


And I wondered why the Klingons referred to the first Enterprise as garbage in TOS :P
Image
OptimusN1701
Headmaster Jr
Posts: 510
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 3:33 pm

Postby sto_vo_kor_2000 » Sun Sep 30, 2007 10:29 pm

Motto: "Today is a good day to die......but the day is not yet over!"
OptimusN1701 wrote:
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:
OptimusN1701 wrote:The Encyclopedia entry you posted said that Scotty was performing shakedown tests and installing systems for an indeterminate amount of time within that year

To me it doesnt make sense to put it through shakedowns and install additional equipment(Which could have been a retrofit I'll admit) on an existing vessel. The ship seemed fairly operational at the end of ST 4, and suffering major malfunctions seems more likely of a new untested shipb


Remember the Yorktown was heavly damaged by the probe......the ships engineir had to gut all systems to make a solor sail just to keep them alive.....even the Kligons LOST a few ships from the probe.And we dont know how much time past after the returned from 1986 and the renaming of the ship.But I would guess it was no longer then 2 or 3 weeks,due to the fact that they wanted to put an end to the Klingon Ambasssador bikering and wanted to thank Kirk and his crew prometly.
I doubt that with all of earths power systems down,and every ship and station that the probe passed by disabled that Star Fleet had the time or the manpower to comit to a full repair job on the Yorktown.
And the script for ST5 claims that just after the Enterprise A entered warp at the end of ST4 the ship started to malfunction.


And I wondered why the Klingons referred to the first Enterprise as garbage in TOS :P


HAHA :grin:

An other reason to believe that it was an older ship that was malfunctioning was that the A had all touch-interfaces in St5. The problems could be linked to the fact that the ships systems were not designed to work with all touch-interfaces.
By ST6 some of the consoles on the bridge were fitted with physical dials and gauges.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds

T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach

Image
sto_vo_kor_2000
Guardian Of Seibertron
Posts: 6888
News Credits: 1
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 1:01 am

Postby OptimusN1701 » Sun Sep 30, 2007 10:35 pm

sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:
OptimusN1701 wrote:
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:
OptimusN1701 wrote:The Encyclopedia entry you posted said that Scotty was performing shakedown tests and installing systems for an indeterminate amount of time within that year

To me it doesnt make sense to put it through shakedowns and install additional equipment(Which could have been a retrofit I'll admit) on an existing vessel. The ship seemed fairly operational at the end of ST 4, and suffering major malfunctions seems more likely of a new untested shipb


Remember the Yorktown was heavly damaged by the probe......the ships engineir had to gut all systems to make a solor sail just to keep them alive.....even the Kligons LOST a few ships from the probe.And we dont know how much time past after the returned from 1986 and the renaming of the ship.But I would guess it was no longer then 2 or 3 weeks,due to the fact that they wanted to put an end to the Klingon Ambasssador bikering and wanted to thank Kirk and his crew prometly.
I doubt that with all of earths power systems down,and every ship and station that the probe passed by disabled that Star Fleet had the time or the manpower to comit to a full repair job on the Yorktown.
And the script for ST5 claims that just after the Enterprise A entered warp at the end of ST4 the ship started to malfunction.


And I wondered why the Klingons referred to the first Enterprise as garbage in TOS :P


HAHA :grin:

An other reason to believe that it was an older ship that was malfunctioning was that the A had all touch-interfaces in St5. The problems could be linked to the fact that the ships systems were not designed to work with all touch-interfaces.
By ST6 some of the consoles on the bridge were fitted with physical dials and gauges.


On Memory Alpha it says that this was done because that's just what the director wanted, but it makes a good explanation.

A very good explanation indeed.

I think we should just agree that she was a great ship
Image
OptimusN1701
Headmaster Jr
Posts: 510
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 3:33 pm

Postby Moonbase2 » Sun Sep 30, 2007 10:41 pm

I've been squeezed out of the thread because I don't know squat about the ships! :sad:

Perhaps I can BS my way thru....eh, maybe not.
Image
Moonbase2
Godmaster
Posts: 1989
News Credits: 2
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 8:05 pm

Postby sto_vo_kor_2000 » Sun Sep 30, 2007 10:52 pm

Motto: "Today is a good day to die......but the day is not yet over!"
OptimusN1701 wrote:
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:
OptimusN1701 wrote:
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:
OptimusN1701 wrote:The Encyclopedia entry you posted said that Scotty was performing shakedown tests and installing systems for an indeterminate amount of time within that year

To me it doesnt make sense to put it through shakedowns and install additional equipment(Which could have been a retrofit I'll admit) on an existing vessel. The ship seemed fairly operational at the end of ST 4, and suffering major malfunctions seems more likely of a new untested shipb


Remember the Yorktown was heavly damaged by the probe......the ships engineir had to gut all systems to make a solor sail just to keep them alive.....even the Kligons LOST a few ships from the probe.And we dont know how much time past after the returned from 1986 and the renaming of the ship.But I would guess it was no longer then 2 or 3 weeks,due to the fact that they wanted to put an end to the Klingon Ambasssador bikering and wanted to thank Kirk and his crew prometly.
I doubt that with all of earths power systems down,and every ship and station that the probe passed by disabled that Star Fleet had the time or the manpower to comit to a full repair job on the Yorktown.
And the script for ST5 claims that just after the Enterprise A entered warp at the end of ST4 the ship started to malfunction.


And I wondered why the Klingons referred to the first Enterprise as garbage in TOS :P


HAHA :grin:

An other reason to believe that it was an older ship that was malfunctioning was that the A had all touch-interfaces in St5. The problems could be linked to the fact that the ships systems were not designed to work with all touch-interfaces.
By ST6 some of the consoles on the bridge were fitted with physical dials and gauges.


On Memory Alpha it says that this was done because that's just what the director wanted, but it makes a good explanation.

A very good explanation indeed.

I think we should just agree that she was a great ship


Thats fine......I was just having fun talking Trek with someone who knows what I'm talking about.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds

T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach

Image
sto_vo_kor_2000
Guardian Of Seibertron
Posts: 6888
News Credits: 1
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 1:01 am

Postby OptimusN1701 » Sun Sep 30, 2007 10:52 pm

It's pretty much over
I see Sto_'s point

Now lets talk about the weapons :twisted:
Image
OptimusN1701
Headmaster Jr
Posts: 510
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 3:33 pm

Postby sto_vo_kor_2000 » Sun Sep 30, 2007 10:53 pm

Motto: "Today is a good day to die......but the day is not yet over!"
Moonbase2 wrote:I've been squeezed out of the thread because I don't know squat about the ships! :sad:

Perhaps I can BS my way thru....eh, maybe not.


You can squeezee your self in anytime babe :x
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds

T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach

Image
sto_vo_kor_2000
Guardian Of Seibertron
Posts: 6888
News Credits: 1
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 1:01 am

Postby OptimusN1701 » Sun Sep 30, 2007 10:54 pm

sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:
OptimusN1701 wrote:
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:
OptimusN1701 wrote:
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:
OptimusN1701 wrote:The Encyclopedia entry you posted said that Scotty was performing shakedown tests and installing systems for an indeterminate amount of time within that year

To me it doesnt make sense to put it through shakedowns and install additional equipment(Which could have been a retrofit I'll admit) on an existing vessel. The ship seemed fairly operational at the end of ST 4, and suffering major malfunctions seems more likely of a new untested shipb


Remember the Yorktown was heavly damaged by the probe......the ships engineir had to gut all systems to make a solor sail just to keep them alive.....even the Kligons LOST a few ships from the probe.And we dont know how much time past after the returned from 1986 and the renaming of the ship.But I would guess it was no longer then 2 or 3 weeks,due to the fact that they wanted to put an end to the Klingon Ambasssador bikering and wanted to thank Kirk and his crew prometly.
I doubt that with all of earths power systems down,and every ship and station that the probe passed by disabled that Star Fleet had the time or the manpower to comit to a full repair job on the Yorktown.
And the script for ST5 claims that just after the Enterprise A entered warp at the end of ST4 the ship started to malfunction.


And I wondered why the Klingons referred to the first Enterprise as garbage in TOS :P


HAHA :grin:

An other reason to believe that it was an older ship that was malfunctioning was that the A had all touch-interfaces in St5. The problems could be linked to the fact that the ships systems were not designed to work with all touch-interfaces.
By ST6 some of the consoles on the bridge were fitted with physical dials and gauges.


On Memory Alpha it says that this was done because that's just what the director wanted, but it makes a good explanation.

A very good explanation indeed.

I think we should just agree that she was a great ship


Thats fine......I was just having fun talking Trek with someone who knows what I'm talking about.


Fear not, for there is always more to talk about where Trek is concerned
Image
OptimusN1701
Headmaster Jr
Posts: 510
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 3:33 pm

Postby sto_vo_kor_2000 » Sun Sep 30, 2007 10:54 pm

Motto: "Today is a good day to die......but the day is not yet over!"
OptimusN1701 wrote:It's pretty much over
I see Sto_'s point

Now lets talk about the weapons :twisted:


Like???????????
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds

T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach

Image
sto_vo_kor_2000
Guardian Of Seibertron
Posts: 6888
News Credits: 1
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 1:01 am

Postby OptimusN1701 » Sun Sep 30, 2007 11:06 pm

sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:
OptimusN1701 wrote:It's pretty much over
I see Sto_'s point

Now lets talk about the weapons :twisted:


Like???????????


Ur favorite Phaser design? idk i just kinda threw it out there
Image
OptimusN1701
Headmaster Jr
Posts: 510
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 3:33 pm

Postby sto_vo_kor_2000 » Sun Sep 30, 2007 11:14 pm

Motto: "Today is a good day to die......but the day is not yet over!"
OptimusN1701 wrote:
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:
OptimusN1701 wrote:It's pretty much over
I see Sto_'s point

Now lets talk about the weapons :twisted:


Like???????????


Ur favorite Phaser design? idk i just kinda threw it out there


If your talking about hand held weapons I always was rather fond of TOS type 2 phaser and the Kligon disruptor from TNG and on.
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds

T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach

Image
sto_vo_kor_2000
Guardian Of Seibertron
Posts: 6888
News Credits: 1
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 1:01 am

Postby OptimusN1701 » Sun Sep 30, 2007 11:26 pm

yea, handhelds

Mine are the ST 5-6 Type 2 and the Type 3 rifle from First Contact
Image
OptimusN1701
Headmaster Jr
Posts: 510
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 3:33 pm

Postby sto_vo_kor_2000 » Sun Sep 30, 2007 11:28 pm

Motto: "Today is a good day to die......but the day is not yet over!"
OptimusN1701 wrote:yea, handhelds

Mine are the ST 5-6 Type 2 and the Type 3 rifle from First Contact


Those were a throw back design to TOS 8)
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds

T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach

Image
sto_vo_kor_2000
Guardian Of Seibertron
Posts: 6888
News Credits: 1
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 1:01 am

Postby OptimusN1701 » Sun Sep 30, 2007 11:30 pm

sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:
OptimusN1701 wrote:yea, handhelds

Mine are the ST 5-6 Type 2 and the Type 3 rifle from First Contact


Those were a throw back design to TOS 8)


The ones from search for spock and voyage home were

These ones were black and looked more gun-like
Image
OptimusN1701
Headmaster Jr
Posts: 510
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2005 3:33 pm

Postby sto_vo_kor_2000 » Sun Sep 30, 2007 11:55 pm

Motto: "Today is a good day to die......but the day is not yet over!"
OptimusN1701 wrote:
sto_vo_kor_2000 wrote:
OptimusN1701 wrote:yea, handhelds

Mine are the ST 5-6 Type 2 and the Type 3 rifle from First Contact


Those were a throw back design to TOS 8)


The ones from search for spock and voyage home were

These ones were black and looked more gun-like


They all looked like guns but I see your point ....here's a scan for you.......

Image
Predaprince wrote:I am very thankful to have posters like sto_vo_kor_2000 who is so energetic about improving others' understanding and enjoyment of the TF universe
Stormrider wrote:You often add interesting insights to conversations that makes the fledglings think and challenges even the sharpest minds

T-Macksimus wrote:I consider you and editor to be amongst the most "scholarly" in terms of your knowledge, demeanor and general approach

Image
sto_vo_kor_2000
Guardian Of Seibertron
Posts: 6888
News Credits: 1
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 1:01 am

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion


[ Incoming message. Source unknown. ] No Signal - Please Stand By [ Click to attempt signal recovery... ]


Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store

Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "TURTLES OF GRAYSKULL #1 Cvr B Dark Horse Comics JUN241136 1B MOTU TMNT (CA)Sakai"
NEW!
TURTLES OF GRAYSKU ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "TURTLES OF GRAYSKULL #4 Cvr A Dark Horse Comics 2025 OCT241122 4A MOTU TMNT"
NEW!
TURTLES OF GRAYSKU ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "TURTLES OF GRAYSKULL #2 Cvr C Dark Horse Comics 2024 JUL241092 2C MOTU TMNT"
NEW!
TURTLES OF GRAYSKU ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "TURTLES OF GRAYSKULL #3 Cvr B Dark Horse Comics 2025 SEP241198 3B MOTU TMNT"
NEW!
TURTLES OF GRAYSKU ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "TMNT Saturday Morning Adv ENDLESS SUMMER Cvr A IDW Comics 2023 JUN231427 Tango"
NEW!
TMNT Saturday Morn ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "TURTLES OF GRAYSKULL #2 Cvr B Dark Horse Comics 2024 JUL241091 2B MOTU TMNT"
NEW!
TURTLES OF GRAYSKU ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "TURTLES OF GRAYSKULL #1 Cvr A Dark Horse Comics 2024 JUN241135 1A MOTU TMNT"
NEW!
TURTLES OF GRAYSKU ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "TURTLES OF GRAYSKULL #3 Cvr A Dark Horse Comics 2025 SEP241197 3A MOTU TMNT"
NEW!
TURTLES OF GRAYSKU ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "TURTLES OF GRAYSKULL #3 Cvr C Dark Horse Comics 2025 SEP241199 3C MOTU TMNT"
NEW!
TURTLES OF GRAYSKU ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "USAGI YOJIMBO #23 IDW Comics 2021 AUG210593 (W/A/CA) Sakai"
NEW!
USAGI YOJIMBO #23 ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "GARGOYLES DARK AGES #2 Cvr F action figure Dynamite Comics JUN230665 2F (CA)Moss"
NEW!
GARGOYLES DARK AGE ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "USAGI YOJIMBO #26 IDW Comics 2022 DEC210550 (W/A/CA) Sakai"
NEW!
USAGI YOJIMBO #26 ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "TURTLES OF GRAYSKULL #1 Cvr C Dark Horse Comics JUN241137 1C MOTU TMNT Ziritt"
NEW!
TURTLES OF GRAYSKU ...
Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "TURTLES OF GRAYSKULL #4 Cvr B Dark Horse Comics 2025 OCT241123 4B MOTU TMNT"
NEW!
TURTLES OF GRAYSKU ...
These are affiliate links. We may earn a commission.
Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.

Featured Products on Amazon.com

Buy "Transformers Generations Titans Return Deluxe Misfire and Aimless" on AMAZON
Buy "Transformers: Generations Power of The Primes Leader Evolution Rodimus Unicronus" on AMAZON
Buy "Transformers Masterpiece Movie Series Barricade MPM-5" on AMAZON
Buy "Transformers Studio Series 11 Deluxe Class Movie 4 Lockdown" on AMAZON
Buy "Transformers Generations Titans Return Deluxe Windblade and Scorchfire" on AMAZON
Buy "Transformers Generations Power of The Primes Deluxe Class Sinnertwin" on AMAZON
Buy "Transformers: Generations Power of The Primes Leader Evolution Rodimus Prime" on AMAZON
Buy "Cyberverse Warrior Class Megatron" on AMAZON
Buy "Hasbro Transformers Generations Titans Return Soundwave and Soundblaster" on AMAZON
Buy "Transformers Generations Combiner Wars Deluxe Class Firefly Figure" on AMAZON
Buy "Transformers MV5 Turbo Changer Super Nova Action Figure" on AMAZON
Buy "Transformers Generations Titans Return Titan Master Monxo and Wolfwire" on AMAZON
These are affiliate links. We may earn a commission.
Details subject to change. See listing for latest price and availability.