Transformers and More @ The Seibertron Store
![Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "ANTAGONY Transformers Legacy Generations Selects Voyager 2023 New"](https://www.seibertron.com/images/ebay/legacy/evolution/voyager-class/antagony/t-DSC01360.jpg)
![Visit shop.seibertron.com to buy "SHARD Transformers Legacy United Deluxe Class Infernac Chaos Hasbro 2024 New"](https://www.seibertron.com/images/ebay/legacy/united/deluxe-class/shard/t-DSC06565.jpg)
bvzxa wrote:ZeroWolf wrote:Or (the more likely scenario), hasbro marketing team invited him because of his online following. No conspiracy needed. However, this talk of reviewers isn't relevant to the conversation is it. Let's get back to talking the toys and what it might mean for the rest of the line. There is no need to hash out old arguments about PvP
As a heads up, we have been emailing and PMing Hasbro about this from our FB group. The admin of the group has spoken to Hasbro on several occasions. One thing is certain he is NOT a Hasbro rep or in any way associated with Hasbro. PvP can never officially state that he is and that is 100% facts.
primalxconvoy wrote:bvzxa wrote:ZeroWolf wrote:Or (the more likely scenario), hasbro marketing team invited him because of his online following. No conspiracy needed. However, this talk of reviewers isn't relevant to the conversation is it. Let's get back to talking the toys and what it might mean for the rest of the line. There is no need to hash out old arguments about PvP
As a heads up, we have been emailing and PMing Hasbro about this from our FB group. The admin of the group has spoken to Hasbro on several occasions. One thing is certain he is NOT a Hasbro rep or in any way associated with Hasbro. PvP can never officially state that he is and that is 100% facts.
Thank you for the additional information, however, I think you've triple posted here, when all you needed was the one reply?
Barricade.it wrote:Quite mediocre figure.
The alt mode is nice but the robot mode is ugly, with that huge backpack and the doors standing stiff backward.
It's clear that this is a kids oriented line, but it's a bit too plain even for kids (and actually, I think in the hands of a kid those doors will surely break in that position)
EvasionModeBumblebee wrote:The flip-out Plasma cannon in particular is really neat!
transformers_va wrote:Good grief! That looks like garbage!!
When I was a child, I had G1 toys, which is why I'm still a huge fan. If these were the toys I had back then, I don't think I'd be a fan now.
SpaceEagle wrote:It's way too silly of me to even think this would happen but is it wrong that i was honestly hoping that they'd change 'Bee's face? It's not the worst of the Bayverse noggins but I was really hoping we'd have something more akin to G1 BB. (Not because I'm a Geewunner, I do genuinely like a lot of the Bayverse designs but BB's face never really appealed to me.)
No, my toys did not "has" better articulation, but they did HAVE better quality, better designs, better transformations, etc. (of course, this is all imo) That thing in the picture looks like the kiddie toys from McDonald'swilliam-james88 wrote:transformers_va wrote:Good grief! That looks like garbage!!
When I was a child, I had G1 toys, which is why I'm still a huge fan. If these were the toys I had back then, I don't think I'd be a fan now.
Your toys had better articulation?
Silverwing wrote:Also, I feel compelled to give the obligatory:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
One for each year of the Movieverse's decade strong tenure. Here's to a few more explosive years!
transformers_va wrote:No, my toys did not "has" better articulation, but they did HAVE better quality, better designs, better transformations, etc. (of course, this is all imo) That thing in the picture looks like the kiddie toys from McDonald'swilliam-james88 wrote:transformers_va wrote:Good grief! That looks like garbage!!
When I was a child, I had G1 toys, which is why I'm still a huge fan. If these were the toys I had back then, I don't think I'd be a fan now.
Your toys had better articulation?
Till-all-R1 wrote:transformers_va wrote:No, my toys did not "has" better articulation, but they did HAVE better quality, better designs, better transformations, etc. (of course, this is all imo) That thing in the picture looks like the kiddie toys from McDonald'swilliam-james88 wrote:transformers_va wrote:Good grief! That looks like garbage!!
When I was a child, I had G1 toys, which is why I'm still a huge fan. If these were the toys I had back then, I don't think I'd be a fan now.
Your toys had better articulation?
I will say that the original figures had a certain "quality" to them the today's toys do not, back then they felt almost real due to the metal parts etc. creating sharp lines and detail. While today most of them come off looing cheaply made. That said, I really like how the articulation has evolved beyond them looking like a stilt statue as well as the how much the detail has improved with head sculpts.
So this is why I'm often conflicted on whether to buy the new stuff or not, it almost feels like a trade off in quality over function. Yet I still wouldn't prefer OG G1 figures over what's being made today.
Emerje wrote:Not to mention the lack of stickers to make fake details (aside from in Titans Return) in modern toys. And really, Bumblebee is just as complex as the majority of G1 figures.
Emerje
william-james88 wrote:Emerje wrote:Not to mention the lack of stickers to make fake details (aside from in Titans Return) in modern toys. And really, Bumblebee is just as complex as the majority of G1 figures.
Emerje
He's more complex. The sad truth is that if Hasbro released figures today that had the same articulation, complexity, proportions and as screen innacurate as G1 figures but for a new show, most collectors would complain, call foul, and say that these look like Happy Meal toys.
chuckdawg1999 wrote:They're supposed to drop this month, any word?
Return to Transformers Toys Discussion
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Fires_Of_Inferno, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], MSN [Bot], Overcracker, Razama, Yahoo [Bot]