robotmel wrote::shock:
If it hasnt been seen or mentioned already...
THEIR CHESTS ARE THE COMBINER PEGS!!
robotmel wrote::shock:
If it hasnt been seen or mentioned already...
THEIR CHESTS ARE THE COMBINER PEGS!!
Rodimus Prime wrote:You can't make me disappear. I am not feet.
DMSL wrote:Simplified and badly scaled Transformers....what is happening to Hasbro.
robotmel wrote::shock:
If it hasnt been seen or mentioned already...
THEIR CHESTS ARE THE COMBINER PEGS!!
Autobot tap out wrote:
i hope y'all realize once Va'al gets back from wherever and reads these post insulting his favorite character , somebody's not going to be a happy camper
LOST Cybertronian wrote: He is currently tied up in the Seibertron.com basement. When we see fit to let him go, you can be sure he will give his opinions on the subject.
D-Maximus_Prime wrote: I thought the Daleks had him?
Hellscream9999 wrote: They do
The truth is revealed
robotmel wrote::shock:
If it hasnt been seen or mentioned already...
THEIR CHESTS ARE THE COMBINER PEGS!!
robotmel wrote:THEIR CHESTS ARE THE COMBINER PEGS!!
Cobotron wrote:Hey! You seemed to have attracted a wild Megatronus. They're hard to find, but boy are they fun when you catch one!
RotorstormNZ wrote:Re the chestpegs, some of us guessed as much I think
I'm surprised there hasn't been/doesn't seem to have been much comment about the combiner hand/foot parts being shown off as weapons on the Deluxes. I love it when they minimise leftover parts, especially when they enhance play value. Nice work HasTak!
william-james88 wrote:I will tell you why I had commented yet: I had not noticed !!!!!
Diem wrote:I'm usually a major Hasbro apologist but those Robots In Disguise figures look dreadful. I really hope there are some real Generations quality figures down the line.
On the other hand actual Generations stuff looks great.
Nemesis Primal wrote:Diem wrote:I'm usually a major Hasbro apologist but those Robots In Disguise figures look dreadful. I really hope there are some real Generations quality figures down the line.
On the other hand actual Generations stuff looks great.
I get the feeling they think grown-up Transformers fans either won't care about anything other than Generations, or shouldn't care about anything other than Generations. And it kinda makes me cranky.
Cobotron wrote:Hey! You seemed to have attracted a wild Megatronus. They're hard to find, but boy are they fun when you catch one!
JelZe GoldRabbit wrote:DMSL wrote:Simplified and badly scaled Transformers....what is happening to Hasbro.
How are they simplified? The Combiners aren't "Beast Hunters Upscaled Cyberverse" simplified or AoE Power Attackers at all, they have all 3 modes for pete sake.
megatronus wrote:I don't understand - we shouldn't be happy at the advent of Generations as a collector-oriented line?
william-james88 wrote:JelZe GoldRabbit wrote:DMSL wrote:Simplified and badly scaled Transformers....what is happening to Hasbro.
How are they simplified? The Combiners aren't "Beast Hunters Upscaled Cyberverse" simplified or AoE Power Attackers at all, they have all 3 modes for pete sake.
I think he was referring to this picture which quite frankly surprised me too:
Since when do voyagers with 3 modes have such few steps???? I am surprised more people aren't up in arms actually. I can understand the simplification of transformation for toys based on a show targetted to younger children, but this is based on a much larger audience. So I don't get it.
JelZe GoldRabbit wrote:From the way I see it, Combiners have to be simpler than other equal-sized figures in order to make the combination gimmick work without sacrificing stability. Less moving parts means parts can be bigger and thus can make a figure more sturdy. Besides, the amount of steps do not reflect difficulty, just complexity.
Noideaforaname wrote:megatronus wrote:I don't understand - we shouldn't be happy at the advent of Generations as a collector-oriented line?
Nothing wrong with Generations, it's the RiD line at fault. If you want a decent Strongarm you're out of luck even though there's like 3-4 different sub-lines for the show.
william-james88 wrote:JelZe GoldRabbit wrote:From the way I see it, Combiners have to be simpler than other equal-sized figures in order to make the combination gimmick work without sacrificing stability. Less moving parts means parts can be bigger and thus can make a figure more sturdy. Besides, the amount of steps do not reflect difficulty, just complexity.
I fully agree. But I ask you this: isn't complexity preferred over difficulty?
Return to Transformers Toys Discussion
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Glyph, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, ScottyP, Yahoo [Bot]