Madeus Prime wrote:Thank you Michael Bay for proving you will use any excuse to show a sexualized woman.
Lol Yep. "We're selling Panties with it" is my favorite line. Legendary
Madeus Prime wrote:Thank you Michael Bay for proving you will use any excuse to show a sexualized woman.
Bronzewolf wrote:Madeus Prime wrote:Thank you Michael Bay for proving you will use any excuse to show a sexualized woman.
Lol Yep. "We're selling Panties with it" is my favorite line. Legendary
His technology is one of the few legitimately praiseworthy things about the movies.BERSEKAEL wrote:Lots of people will try to criticize Mr. Bay, and in the end, they will end up using his technology/ideas...
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Burn wrote:As long as this Arthur isn't anything like that twatwaffle Arthur he played on OUAT.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Sabrblade wrote:It's also possible that, instead of any time travel, all the Arthurian scenes take place entirely in flashbacks. Maybe a reasonable amount of the film is set in the past the natural way.
Va'al wrote:Deadput wrote:Actually I don't know my mother's name is Valerie so is Va'al actually my mother?
Yes. Now go to your room and don't play with yourself.
Which would mean it draws just as much inspiration from the first TF UK comic arc, "Man of Iron", as "A Decepticon Raider In King Arthur's Court".Sabrblade wrote:It's also possible that, instead of any time travel, all the Arthurian scenes take place entirely in flashbacks. Maybe a reasonable amount of the film is set in the past the natural way.
dragons wrote:i can deal with flashbacks as long there is no transformers travel back in time as was in cartoon
May he rest in peace.Whifflefire wrote:And Graham Chapman is the best King Arthur.
Shadowman wrote:This is Sabrblade we're talking about. His ability to store trivial information about TV shows is downright superhuman.
Caelus wrote:My wife pointed out something interesting about the prehistoric Predacons. I said that everyone was complaining because transforming for them mostly consisted of them just standing up-right. She essentially said, 'So? That's what our ancestors did.'
Mark Wahlberg stars alongside Josh Duhamel, Tyrese Gibson, Isabela Moner, Laura Haddock, Jerrod Carmichael, Gil Birmingham and Anthony Hopkins. Santiago Cabrera will co-star as Merlin, and many of your favorite Autobots and Decepticons will return as well.
Seibertron.com wrote:Cabrera was a regular in British series Merlin (hmmmm concidence?).
Noideaforaname wrote:This movie's just getting weird. Like, they're building on the past film's rather inexplicable mention of Knights, but instead of that being about alien robots it's now literally King Arthur (because the G1 cartoon did something like that so it's automatically justified? and/or they gotta work in the whole "ancient thing on Earth is TRANSFORMERS related" plot again), with dragons and human wizards and everything. But there's still police car and crane robots somehow?
Dr Va'al wrote:Seibertronian overlord Burn
Return to Transformers Live Action Film Forum
Registered users: Big Grim, Bing [Bot], blackeyedprime, bluecatcinema, Fires_Of_Inferno, Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], TFIta369, TK415