Nemesis Primal wrote:I really want to add the Prime Insecticons to this, but I honestly have no idea what the quality of the Cyberverse Commander figure is.
Nemesis Primal wrote:Considering Wasp's only figure of him as Wasp and not Waspinator got cancelled, does he even count?
I really want to add the Prime Insecticons to this, but I honestly have no idea what the quality of the Cyberverse Commander figure is.
AllNewSuperRobot wrote:
Poor Broadside...
IMO if even 1 mode is bad, then its a bad toy. And TR Broadside/Tidal Wave was bad. Considering the source material, I doubt there will ever be a good Broadside toy. But honestly, so were most of the other TR triplechangers, except maybe for Octane.william-james88 wrote:AllNewSuperRobot wrote:
Poor Broadside...
While the TR mold's jet mode is laughable and there were some really dumb choices made, I personally don't see it as a bad toy overall.
Rodimus Prime wrote:IMO if even 1 mode is bad, then its a bad toy. And TR Broadside/Tidal Wave was bad. Considering the source material, I doubt there will ever be a good Broadside toy. But honestly, so were most of the other TR triplechangers, except maybe for Octane.william-james88 wrote:AllNewSuperRobot wrote:
Poor Broadside...
While the TR mold's jet mode is laughable and there were some really dumb choices made, I personally don't see it as a bad toy overall.
Rodimus Prime wrote:Yeah I thought of that as well after my post, he should be a massive transport plane, it would translate better between alt modes.
Emerje wrote: we're never going to get a perfect G1 version that makes sense.
AllNewSuperRobot wrote:Because, that "jet" mode, just doesn't work. There isn't enough suspension of disbelief in the world for it to be acceptable.
Not really. That "truck" mode barely looks like a truck. The Titans Return figure pulled it off much better.AllNewSuperRobot wrote:Emerje wrote: we're never going to get a perfect G1 version that makes sense.
And yet, there is Octane...
Similarly disproportionate altmodes, yet his design works?
Jelze Bunnycat wrote:- Prime Airachnid
Jelze Bunnycat wrote:In all fairness, should we discount characters that got only one single toy?
Rodimus Prime wrote:What about Rack'n'Ruin? Did his G1 self ever even get a toy?
AllNewSuperRobot wrote:Jelze Bunnycat wrote:In all fairness, should we discount characters that got only one single toy?
I wouldn't have thought so. The title seems inclusive of singular entries.
william-james88 wrote:AllNewSuperRobot wrote:Jelze Bunnycat wrote:In all fairness, should we discount characters that got only one single toy?
I wouldn't have thought so. The title seems inclusive of singular entries.
Yeah, the whole point for me is to see which toys would be worth it for Hasbro to redo rather than rehashing the same characters over and over.
It's the same idea as remaking good popular movies, wouldn't it make more sense to remake the bad ones and make them good?
Jelze Bunnycat wrote:william-james88 wrote:AllNewSuperRobot wrote:Jelze Bunnycat wrote:In all fairness, should we discount characters that got only one single toy?
I wouldn't have thought so. The title seems inclusive of singular entries.
Yeah, the whole point for me is to see which toys would be worth it for Hasbro to redo rather than rehashing the same characters over and over.
It's the same idea as remaking good popular movies, wouldn't it make more sense to remake the bad ones and make them good?
Eliminating bad aftertaste takes a whole lot.
Here's another: most of the Beast Machines Maximals.
Return to Transformers Toys Discussion
Registered users: Bing [Bot], Blastback, Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot], SupersonicShockwave