AcademyofDrX wrote:Jelze Bunnycat wrote:AcademyofDrX wrote:Emerje wrote:Exactly. Movie designs used in the movies tend to belong to studios so the only way Hasbro can do non-movie line figures with them is either original designs or movie inspired redesigns that aren't all that accurate.
Emerje
I can't imagine that's true. I could see if there were real-world vehicle licensing issues, but where is this idea coming from?
Edit: I guess I could also imagine that Hasbro couldn't license out movie figures to FunPub, but I can't imagine any reason that Hasbro could use movie character designs in, say, Studio Series but not Legacy. SS and Buzzworthy Bumblebee are both lines that mix movie and non-movie characters, since SS86 is independent of Paramount.
It's a combination of Paramount licensing the robot mode designs, and the car manufacturers licensing the models to Hasbro, and each comes with a set of Terms of Use, just like any license.
Is the suggestion here that Hasbro is giving Paramount a cut of all their movie toy sales? I don't know what was in the contract, but this doesn't make sense as a general principle of derivative works IP as I understand it, "robot mode designs" would not be protected material separate from Hasbro's rights to the characters. As a point of comparison, IDW designs are not the property of IDW or comics artists, but become Hasbro's property to use as they see fit.
The movie itself is Paramount's property, certain assets involved in the production would be too, but "robot mode designs" wouldn't make sense to be a property for the licensee when the licensor's whole business is selling robot toys. I would really like to see some primary source info to back this up. I'm also not aware of any case of a licensor being prohibited from using new designs from a licensee, though there have been uncertified rumors of that with Masters of the Universe and She-Ra. I would be shocked if that's not cared for in modern contracts.
I don't know the specifics, but the Live Action Movies can be considered a group project, with certain companies maintaining copyright of certain aspects of that project. The overview of who owns what can be quite convoluted, but we can agree Hasbro owns the toy designs and molds, and Paramount owns the movie itself and all assets thereof, including character designs. Because of licensing, everything legal turns into a spaghetti bowl with everyone tied together: Paramount can't do anything with the movie without Hasbro's say-so, and Hasbro can't release toys based on the movies without Paramount's say-so.