Article: "How 'Transformers' Performs May Show a Changed Paramount"
Saturday, June 30th, 2007 10:50AM CDT
Categories: Movie Related News, Digital Media NewsPosted by: Seibertron Views: 10,122
Topic Options: View Discussion · Sign in or Join to reply
The Wall Street Journal online has been a very interesting article on their website. The article talks about how the Transformers movie could be a huge money maker for Paramount. The movie apparently only cost about $145 million which is pretty amazing when compared with other major blockbusters such as Spiderman 3 and Pirates of the Caribbean 3, both of which cost around $300 million each. The article also includes a video clip with Michael Bay and Hasbro's CEO Al Verrecchi talking about the Transformers movie. Click here to read the article at the Wall Street Journal Online.
Credit(s): Hotrod
News Search
Got Transformers News? Let us know here!
Most Popular Transformers News
ROTB Optimus Prime Lead Designer Discusses Why the Face Looks Similar to the 2007 Movie
57,398 viewsMost Recent Transformers News
News Categories: Toy News, Movie Related News, Cartoon News, Comic Book News, Site News, Rumors, Event News, Digital Media News, Collectables, Sponsor News, Game News, Site Articles, Store News, Reviews, People News, Company News, Sightings, Press Releases, Unlicensed Products News, Auctions, Transtopia, Interviews, Editorials, Collector's Club News, Knock Offs, Podcast, Heavy Metal War, Contests, Book News, Top Lists
Re: Article: "How 'Transformers' Performs May Show a Changed Paramount" (191753)
Posted by Anonymous on June 30th, 2007 @ 11:20am CDT
Posted by Anonymous on June 30th, 2007 @ 11:20am CDT
TF could prove to be a major cash cow for them, no doubt about it.
Re: Article: "How 'Transformers' Performs May Show a Changed Paramount" (191777)
Posted by Liege Evilmus on June 30th, 2007 @ 11:48am CDT
Posted by Liege Evilmus on June 30th, 2007 @ 11:48am CDT
So in short, expect more lifelike CGI robot movies cause they are cheaper to make.
I did hear of a Voltron script, HHHMMMMmmm...
I did hear of a Voltron script, HHHMMMMmmm...
Re: Article: "How 'Transformers' Performs May Show a Changed Paramount" (191867)
Posted by Grimshock on June 30th, 2007 @ 1:07pm CDT
Posted by Grimshock on June 30th, 2007 @ 1:07pm CDT
In the end, I guess more money wouldn't have helped make it good movie anyway considering the plot and concept.
Re: Article: "How 'Transformers' Performs May Show a Changed Paramount" (191880)
Posted by Nico on June 30th, 2007 @ 1:19pm CDT
Posted by Nico on June 30th, 2007 @ 1:19pm CDT
Sometime, putting too much money in a film make it crash...
Money does not equal good film, look at "The Blar Witch Project"!
Money does not equal good film, look at "The Blar Witch Project"!
Re: Article: "How 'Transformers' Performs May Show a Changed Paramount" (191901)
Posted by kendragon on June 30th, 2007 @ 1:43pm CDT
Yay!!! maybe we'll get a zoids movie.... lmao or a remake of Robot Jox
Posted by kendragon on June 30th, 2007 @ 1:43pm CDT
Liege Evilmus wrote:So in short, expect more lifelike CGI robot movies cause they are cheaper to make.
I did hear of a Voltron script, HHHMMMMmmm...
Yay!!! maybe we'll get a zoids movie.... lmao or a remake of Robot Jox
Re: Article: "How 'Transformers' Performs May Show a Changed Paramount" (191951)
Posted by Ahkileez on June 30th, 2007 @ 2:25pm CDT
Posted by Ahkileez on June 30th, 2007 @ 2:25pm CDT
You laugh, but Robot Jox is a great concept. And the effects were pretty state of the art, at the time.
Robot Jox is a movie that would actually benefit from a remake and would serve as a less 'out there' vehicle to soften up audiences for Mechwarrior type stuff.
Robot Jox is a movie that would actually benefit from a remake and would serve as a less 'out there' vehicle to soften up audiences for Mechwarrior type stuff.
Re: Article: "How 'Transformers' Performs May Show a Changed Paramount" (191998)
Posted by frogbat on June 30th, 2007 @ 3:16pm CDT
Posted by frogbat on June 30th, 2007 @ 3:16pm CDT
i reckon they saved themselves about 50 million by not using big name "actors" -
from what i've read I reckon they should get a 2nd director to film the acting bits add some plot and let bay direct the action. Oh and it's always good to use stage trained thesps to add gravitas to an otherwise silly movie - alec guinness in star wars, patrick stewart in TNG...
from what i've read I reckon they should get a 2nd director to film the acting bits add some plot and let bay direct the action. Oh and it's always good to use stage trained thesps to add gravitas to an otherwise silly movie - alec guinness in star wars, patrick stewart in TNG...
Re: Article: "How 'Transformers' Performs May Show a Changed Paramount" (192016)
Posted by teroh1988 on June 30th, 2007 @ 3:36pm CDT
Posted by teroh1988 on June 30th, 2007 @ 3:36pm CDT
..may change them into a mad childhood raping machine!!!!!
(sarcasm) i just expect a few good sequels then maybe a prequel and itll go down hill from there
(sarcasm) i just expect a few good sequels then maybe a prequel and itll go down hill from there
Re: Article: "How 'Transformers' Performs May Show a Changed Paramount" (192283)
Posted by Anonymous on June 30th, 2007 @ 6:50pm CDT
Thank you! Too many average "actors" are overpaid, resulting in HORENDOUS film budgets.
Oh, and teroh1988, you signature OWNS!!!
Posted by Anonymous on June 30th, 2007 @ 6:50pm CDT
frogbat wrote:i reckon they saved themselves about 50 million by not using big name "actors" -
from what i've read I reckon they should get a 2nd director to film the acting bits add some plot and let bay direct the action. Oh and it's always good to use stage trained thesps to add gravitas to an otherwise silly movie - alec guinness in star wars, patrick stewart in TNG...
Thank you! Too many average "actors" are overpaid, resulting in HORENDOUS film budgets.
Oh, and teroh1988, you signature OWNS!!!
/t-DSC04013.jpg)
-241207/t-DSC06109.jpg)
/t-DSC01609.jpg)
/t-DSC00713.jpg)
/t-DSC01635.jpg)
