Rob Liefeld on Akiva Goldsman and Transformers, Hasbro / Paramount Shared Universe
Monday, January 9th, 2017 2:37AM CST
Categories: Movie Related News, People News, InterviewsPosted by: Va'al Views: 40,683
Topic Options: View Discussion · Sign in or Join to reply
Since 2015, Oscar-winning screenwriter Akiva Goldsman has become a big name in the world of cinematic universe franchises. In collaboration with Paramount Pictures, he not only created a braintrust that would help formulate the future of the Transformers series, but also went on to do the same thing with Hasbro and brands like G.I. Joe and ROM: Space Knight. We haven't seen an actual product from this process just yet, as none of the developing projects have made it to release -- but the methodology is continuing to spread, as the same approach that's going into the construction of the recently-announced Extreme Cinematic Universe.
[...]
[Liefeld:] So I kind of was thinking, 'I'm going to go to this meeting and maybe I'll get a good look at some Dark Tower stuff,' and what ended up happening is he goes, 'I want to hand you this giant black leather-bound equivalent of a phone book,' and it said, "The Transformers Bible." This thing is awesome and Akiva goes, 'I just want you to know, there's only eight of these in existence. Michael Bay has one, I have one, the head of Paramount has one, and the five other people involved have them.' So I flipped through it, and it's every treatment, outlines, screenplay, for the lineup of Transformer films that they have planned, that he was a showrunner for...
So he said to me, he said, 'It's pretty cool, right? I'm like, 'Yeah!' He's like, 'I ran this room; this is what we came up with. This is what I did on behalf of Paramount.' He goes, 'In a couple months, I'm going to go run the Hasbro room, and we're going to do the same thing for ROM, Micronauts, G.I. Joe. We're going to put together this Hasbro Cinematic Universe, and then he said, I would like to do yours next. And I said, 'Uhhhhhh, Okay, WOW!'
News Search
Got Transformers News? Let us know here!
Most Popular Transformers News
ROTB Optimus Prime Lead Designer Discusses Why the Face Looks Similar to the 2007 Movie
57,796 viewsMost Recent Transformers News
Posted by JazZeke on January 9th, 2017 @ 10:01am CST
Posted by Munkky on January 9th, 2017 @ 12:18pm CST
Posted by Burn on January 9th, 2017 @ 2:19pm CST
Posted by Sabrblade on January 9th, 2017 @ 11:31pm CST
Burn wrote:This should have been titled "Akiva Goldsman acknowledges the awesomeness that is Rob Liefeld"
Posted by Burn on January 10th, 2017 @ 12:42am CST
Posted by Sabrblade on January 10th, 2017 @ 12:51am CST
It wasn't pointless. That gif means "'90s Kid approves". '90s Kid is a character on Atop the Fourth Wall who LOVES Rob Liefeld's work. Your calling Liefeld awesome is something he'd agree with, therefore he approves your post as a most righteous one.Burn wrote:Actually an 80's kid. Thank you for your incredibly pointless post.
Posted by SlyTF1 on March 18th, 2017 @ 9:03am CDT
https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/transfo ... 19083?mt=8
I read some of it, but not all. Apparently there are some inconsistencies between the history that's presented in the app, and what's actually happened in the movies.
Posted by D-Maximal_Primal on March 18th, 2017 @ 1:14pm CDT
SlyTF1 wrote:An app went live yesterday, showing new pictures of TLK, and even giving the history of the Transformers from the beginning of time. There's some crazy stuff in here that potentially hints at the direction the movies are going to go in after TLK.
https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/transfo ... 19083?mt=8
I read some of it, but not all. Apparently there are some inconsistencies between the history that's presented in the app, and what's actually happened in the movies.
Hey Sly, is there anyway you can copy some of the text and post it? I can news if you give me some text!
Posted by Sabrblade on March 18th, 2017 @ 10:02pm CDT
Posted by D-Maximal_Primal on March 18th, 2017 @ 10:03pm CDT
Sabrblade wrote:Judging from just those screenshots, the Lore looks like it might be mostly but not precisely Aligned-based.
Do you mind posting screenshots for a news article?
Posted by Sabrblade on March 18th, 2017 @ 10:06pm CDT
I'm just looking at the sample pics on the iTunes page Sly linked to.D-Maximus_Prime wrote:Sabrblade wrote:Judging from just those screenshots, the Lore looks like it might be mostly but not precisely Aligned-based.
Do you mind posting screenshots for a news article?
Do you mean that you can't see the page when you click it?
Posted by D-Maximal_Primal on March 18th, 2017 @ 10:10pm CDT
Sabrblade wrote:I'm just looking at the sample pics on the iTunes page Sly linked to.D-Maximus_Prime wrote:Sabrblade wrote:Judging from just those screenshots, the Lore looks like it might be mostly but not precisely Aligned-based.
Do you mind posting screenshots for a news article?
Do you mean that you can't see the page when you click it?
I can, but I thought there was more and what you were seeing was actually in the app
Posted by Sabrblade on March 18th, 2017 @ 10:12pm CDT
Interestingly enough, some of the pics on that page change to different ones when you switch looking at the iPhone screenshots to the iPad ones.D-Maximus_Prime wrote:Sabrblade wrote:I'm just looking at the sample pics on the iTunes page Sly linked to.D-Maximus_Prime wrote:Sabrblade wrote:Judging from just those screenshots, the Lore looks like it might be mostly but not precisely Aligned-based.
Do you mind posting screenshots for a news article?
Do you mean that you can't see the page when you click it?
I can, but I thought there was more and what you were seeing was actually in the app
Posted by D-Maximal_Primal on April 4th, 2017 @ 8:08pm CDT
Apparently, according to an article published by Movie Web the Transformers live action universe is set to keep trucking along for years to come. There are currently 14 stories that are currently in the works, though it is extremely unlikely all 14 will come to fruition. We already know that the Bumblebee movie is set to come out next year and Transformers 6 is set to come out in 2019, so right there are 2 of the 14 covered. We'll need to keep an eye on this story as it develops.
You can read the whole article by following the link above and catch a snippet below.
Paramount has more than a dozen various Transformers movies outlined, courtesy of a writer's room that was assembled in 2015. The announcement was made by Michael Bay during an event for Transformers: The Last Knight, which was held recently at London's Cineworld IMAX on Leicester Square. The director, who was reportedly looking pretty casual and wearing a Boba Fett shirt, showed off a bunch of footage from the upcoming Transformers movie and decided to break the news that they can expect a whole lot more from the franchise in the future.
Posted by JazZeke on April 4th, 2017 @ 8:14pm CDT
Posted by Hellscream9999 on April 4th, 2017 @ 8:44pm CDT
JazZeke wrote:
Posted by Kurona on April 4th, 2017 @ 8:53pm CDT
Posted by BumbleDouche on April 4th, 2017 @ 9:42pm CDT
Posted by Microraptor on April 4th, 2017 @ 9:51pm CDT
Posted by kurthy on April 4th, 2017 @ 11:32pm CDT
Posted by Seibertron on April 5th, 2017 @ 1:24am CDT
Here's what Michael Bay said (as fast as I could write these notes down at both events):
A couple of years ago we had a writer's room with 14 writers. We locked them up in a room for about a month and they came up with 14 different stories of where this franchise could go in the future. They came up with a wonderful mythology.
No where in what Michael Bay said did he make statements that Paramount has 14 movies planned or anything of that sort. He said 14 writers came up with 14 different ideas of where this franchise could go in the future. He said they came up with a wonderful mythology. I interpreted that as "here's 14 goals we could go after" or "here's 14 plot points we could tackle" and that those 14 plot points collectively became the mythology to which Michael Bay referred. Does it mean there are 14 movies planned? Most likely not. Did Michael Bay say anything about 14 movies being planned? Not at all. 14 different stories of where this franchise could go in the future. That's all he said. Read into that what you will. But what Movie Web is reporting is inaccurate because that's a whole boatload of assumptions from things that were not said.
I'll tackle of some of the differences between the footage we were shown at the Super fan Event two weeks ago versus the footage shown on April 4th. There were surprisingly many differences, different scenes, scenes that were absent, and more will be some of what I address tomorrow.
Posted by Deadput on April 5th, 2017 @ 1:32am CDT
It was 14 scripts and while unstated it sounds like one of them or a combination of a few of them became The Last Knight.
But who knows maybe parts of the other scripts will become parts of a future movie or two I mean the Bumblebee movie is supposed to come out next year.
Posted by ScottyP on April 5th, 2017 @ 7:53am CDT
Posted by Carnivius_Prime on April 5th, 2017 @ 9:00am CDT
Posted by o.supreme on April 5th, 2017 @ 12:43pm CDT
Posted by william-james88 on April 5th, 2017 @ 12:57pm CDT
o.supreme wrote:I agree its agonizing how news is reported inaccurately, but apparently screen junkies is doing some sort of live event scheduled for 2:45pm (EST) 10:45am (PST) in just under 3 minuets based on this information...what the reason is for the "live" report...I have no idea.
They should know better, one of our very own staff members is also on their team.
Posted by Seibertron on April 5th, 2017 @ 1:00pm CDT
william-james88 wrote:o.supreme wrote:I agree its agonizing how news is reported inaccurately, but apparently screen junkies is doing some sort of live event scheduled for 2:45pm (EST) 10:45am (PST) in just under 3 minuets based on this information...what the reason is for the "live" report...I have no idea.
They should know better, one of our very own staff members is also on their team.
Who?
Posted by o.supreme on April 5th, 2017 @ 1:00pm CDT
william-james88 wrote:They should know better, one of our very own staff members is also on their team.
Really? Is it Victor?
Posted by william-james88 on April 5th, 2017 @ 1:02pm CDT
Seibertron wrote:william-james88 wrote:o.supreme wrote:I agree its agonizing how news is reported inaccurately, but apparently screen junkies is doing some sort of live event scheduled for 2:45pm (EST) 10:45am (PST) in just under 3 minuets based on this information...what the reason is for the "live" report...I have no idea.
They should know better, one of our very own staff members is also on their team.
Who?
Jon 3.0
Posted by Va'al on May 27th, 2017 @ 12:21pm CDT
In addition, they also add that the Transformers franchise will be adding four more movies at least after The Last Knight - three (ish) of which we know about: Bumblebee, Cybertron, and potentially Ancient Rome. But we personally think the article is just speculating. What do you think? Let us know in the Energon Pub!
Dergarabedian said that international audiences, particularly in China, India and South America, still embrace these films because they grew up on big American blockbusters and enjoy the action-packed adventures.
"Action is the international language and that's what audiences really respond to," he said.
"The Pirates of the Caribbean" franchise isn't the only one that gets an international boost. The "Transformers" films have also been met by lackluster reviews and U.S. audience fatigue.
The fourth "Transformers" film, "Age of Extinction," which was released in 2014, garnered more than $858.6 million in international tickets. Domestically, its ticket sales for the full run of the film were about $245 million.
Dergarabedian attributed the film's international success not only to the action sequences, but the cast of Mark Wahlberg, an action movie star, and the fact that much of the film took place in a city in China. He said that international audiences like to see films set on a global stage
[...]
Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales
Source: Disney
Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales
If you've looked at the movie listings this weekend, and asked yourself "Why is Disney making another 'Pirates of the Caribbean film?" you're not alone.
The fifth installment "Dead Men Tell No Tales" opens Friday in the U.S. With each new addition to the Pirates' franchise, the reviews have gotten worse and the U.S. audiences have shrunk. But overseas, fans are still enamored with Johnny Depp's swashbuckling portrayal of Captain Jack Sparrow.
International markets have driven the majority of box office revenue for the "Pirates" franchise since the first film was released in 2003. At the box office "Curse of the Black Pearl" saw a pretty even split between U.S. and international ticket sales, but with each additional release, that gap has widened.
By the fourth film, "On Stranger Tides," more than 75 percent of box office revenue was earned overseas, a whopping $804.8 million.
For comparison, the film garnered $241 million in the U.S., less than the opening weekend gross of "Star Wars: The Force Awakens."
"U.S. audiences have been subjected to so many sequels over the decades that it is hard to maintain the excitement," Paul Dergarabedian, senior media analyst for comScore, told CNBC.
Despite the lackluster performances in the United States, two of the "Pirates" films have garnered more than $1 billion in total global ticket sales and one fell just shy of the mark with $962 million.
Dergarabedian said that international audiences, particularly in China, India and South America, still embrace these films because they grew up on big American blockbusters and enjoy the action-packed adventures.
"Action is the international language and that's what audiences really respond to," he said.
"The Pirates of the Caribbean" franchise isn't the only one that gets an international boost. The "Transformers" films have also been met by lackluster reviews and U.S. audience fatigue.
The fourth "Transformers" film, "Age of Extinction," which was released in 2014, garnered more than $858.6 million in international tickets. Domestically, its ticket sales for the full run of the film were about $245 million.
Dergarabedian attributed the film's international success not only to the action sequences, but the cast of Mark Wahlberg, an action movie star, and the fact that much of the film took place in a city in China. He said that international audiences like to see films set on a global stage.
"If you look at the numbers, international has to be at the forefront," Dergarabedian said. "Appealing to global audiences is the driving force."
That's why this summer a fifth "Transformers" film, "The Last Knight," will hit theaters.
While several cast members of the "Pirates" franchise have hinted that there could be more films in the future, the studio does not currently have any plans for a sixth installment.
"Transformers," on the other hand, is slated to release at least four more films after "The Last Knight," one of which will be a standalone "Bumblebee" movie set for release in 2018.
Posted by Va'al on August 2nd, 2017 @ 5:11pm CDT
When Paramount and Hasbro began laying the groundwork for a potential Transformers Cinematic Universe, they hired Oscar-winning screenwriter Akiva Goldsman to lead a writers room to expand the world. The first movie that resulted from that writers room was this summer’s Transformers: The Last Knight, with a Bumblebee standalone movie next in line.
Things got less certain in the lead-up to The Last Knight’s release, with both director Michael Bay and star Mark Wahlberg suggesting they were done with Transformers movies. Now, /Film has learned that Goldsman is done, too. Goldsman spoke with us at the Television Critics Association, where he was representing Star Trek: Discovery.
Asked if he was still involved with Transformers, Goldsman simply said, “No.”
A slightly longer, but not that much, response was given by producer Lorenzo di Bonaventura, via Franchise Fred News (full story here):
“The writers room which was set up by all of us was set up to explore the mythology more,” Di Bonaventura explained. “It was set up for a few different reasons but the biggest thing that happened in it was they expanded the mythology of Transformers in a way that allowed us to go to King Arthur. There’s different areas, like we’ve examined World War II, etc.”
As for the state of the proposed Transformers extended universe, Di Bonaventura is focused on Bumblebee.
Does this change anything for you? Are you still interested in the rumoured Roman-era movie, Cybertron prequel, and more WWII action? Let us know in the Energon Pub discussion!
Posted by Quantum Surge on August 2nd, 2017 @ 5:30pm CDT
Posted by SnoopDawg on August 2nd, 2017 @ 5:47pm CDT
Edit: Goldsman also wrote Batman and Robin, so that's enough reason
Posted by Barricade.it on August 2nd, 2017 @ 6:28pm CDT
Nevertheless, TF have still a great appeal even though a radical choice like TLK has seriously damaged it (though imho TLK is far better than AOE). The only way to give this franchise some new energy is to go back to the roots and guide things in their own place, without all the mess that has nothing to do with TFuniverse itself.
I think Bee Movie will have more success than TLK right because from the first news it appears this movie will do exacty this.
In other words: they should take courage and cancel TLK and AOE and let TFs be TFs.
Posted by kurthy on August 2nd, 2017 @ 10:31pm CDT
Posted by Dagon on August 2nd, 2017 @ 10:44pm CDT
Posted by JazZeke on August 3rd, 2017 @ 12:22am CDT
Dagon wrote:Well. There goes that quality cinematic universe, I guess. Back to bad scripts after the meisterwerk that was The Last Knight.
Again, "Batman & Robin." I doubt quality was ever on the table.
Posted by Evil Eye on August 3rd, 2017 @ 4:47am CDT
To be honest, I think the writer's room was part of the problem. Too many cooks spoil the broth. TLK was a mess of a hundred potentially good ideas all crammed into one movie. Had it focused purely on the Knights/staff storyline, or the Autobots on the run, or the Decepticons getting out of prison, it might have worked. As is, having all those story threads and ideas running through one movie was a recipe for disaster. The only movies I've seen that pull off that amount of different subplots well have been Amelie and most Coen Brothers movies, and fairly obviously comparing those to Transformers is a silly idea.
If we do get a TF6 (not counting the spinoffs) hopefully it'll be a return to form- one or two writers at most, a straightforward but solid story and plenty of robot action with only the token amount of humans.
Posted by RAR on August 3rd, 2017 @ 5:23am CDT
I can only really conclude that Bay just used the people complaining about them being to long to not finish his movie properly at all let alone just cut what was shot. It's clear that a whole lot of what he left in was filler and that other scenes are poorly explained - over-explained or not explained at all.
I don't think the usual problems all Transformers Movie share is going to be down to a reduced run time - they will be down to Bay being incapable of doing his job properly and Paramount being incapable of approving a script that makes sense.
People say the same thing again and again and they don't listen
People say
1) The screen is to dark (even worse in 3D) and you can't tell the characters apart (even the humans sometimes)
2) The framing of scenes is just wonky and disjointed with robots and sometimes people out of frame and it's just confusing to look at.
3) The Music is to generic and repetitive and self-reverential
4) Characters just disappear and also take actions that make no sense
5) Character are in the Movie who serve no purpose who's entire presence could be trimmed to 2 lines of dialgue and a saving of millions of dollars
6) Lack of Expert approval - any technical dialogue - is ALWAYS wrong - and often the visual are wrong too.
Posted by Va'al on August 3rd, 2017 @ 5:28am CDT
RAR wrote:I'm disappointed the Movie Press is pretty much ignoring The Last Knight - as there is some very odd things that seem to have happened with this Movie that made it go off the rails in some uniquely bizarre ways.
I can only really conclude that Bay just used the people complaining about them being to long to not finish his movie properly at all let alone just cut what was shot. It's clear that a whole lot of what he left in was filler and that other scenes are poorly explained - over-explained or not explained at all.
I don't think the usual problems all Transformers Movie share is going to be down to a reduced run time - they will be down to Bay being incapable of doing his job properly and Paramount being incapable of approving a script that makes sense.
People say the same thing again and again and they don't listen
People say
1) The screen is to dark (even worse in 3D) and you can't tell the characters apart (even the humans sometimes)
2) The framing of scenes is just wonky and disjointed with robots and sometimes people out of frame and it's just confusing to look at.
3) The Music is to generic and repetitive and self-reverential
4) Characters just disappear and also take actions that make no sense
5) Character are in the Movie who serve no purpose who's entire presence could be trimmed to 2 lines of dialgue and a saving of millions of dollars
6) Lack of Expert approval - any technical dialogue - is ALWAYS wrong - and often the visual are wrong too.
a) probably not the right thread
b) movie media is ignoring TLK? huh?
Posted by Windsweeper on August 3rd, 2017 @ 5:47am CDT
Same with Bay after Revenge of the Fallen.
If they do reboot the franchise I hope they stay away from horrible designs like Frenzy, Starscream, Ironhide, Wheelie, Reedman, the Twins, Jetfire, Brains, Que, Drift, Hound and Gecko. All of whom looked like rejects from the Robots movie and not Transformers.
Alien robots shouldn't have hair, buck teeth or samurai armour.
The comics work because they treat Transformers like proper sci fi and not bloody Harry Potter.
Except Barber who focuses too much on humans and gives us crap like the droid, Garrison Blackrock and Thundercracker's dog and should also be kept away from the Transformers.
Posted by Va'al on August 3rd, 2017 @ 7:01am CDT
Posted by Palo_zfogs on August 3rd, 2017 @ 9:13am CDT
Windsweeper wrote:Good riddance to Goldsman. After Batman and Robin, he and Schumacher should never have been left near another movie.
Same with Bay after Revenge of the Fallen.
If they do reboot the franchise I hope they stay away from horrible designs like Frenzy, Starscream, Ironhide, Wheelie, Reedman, the Twins, Jetfire, Brains, Que, Drift, Hound and Gecko. All of whom looked like rejects from the Robots movie and not Transformers.
Alien robots shouldn't have hair, buck teeth or samurai armour.
The comics work because they treat Transformers like proper sci fi and not bloody Harry Potter.
Except Barber who focuses too much on humans and gives us crap like the droid, Garrison Blackrock and Thundercracker's dog and should also be kept away from the Transformers.
So you're saying you prefer the Reboot to have G1-looking characters literally?
Posted by partholon on August 3rd, 2017 @ 9:31am CDT
the films STILL making money, last i checked it was circa 570million worldwide so its made its production budget back so everyone gets paid.
and its been enough of a FLOP to merit a real reboot.
i hate to see something fail but it took batman and robin to get the dark knight made so hopefully despite TF5 being nowhere NEAR as bad as BnR itll serve as the launch pad for a "REAL" Transformers film wherein the characters actually look and act like their supposed to.
ive no prob with steering away from G1 - personally i'd love to see an adaptation of IDWs infiltration/escalation arc. but they NEED to get back to some core tropes.
the cons have to be proactive and an effective threat, the bots have to be on the backfoot before overcoming the odds. prime needs to act like prime and not bloody grimlock. ditto megatron needs to be scary because of who he IS and not what he looks like.
moreover they need a proper fecking reason to be on earth that isnt a mcguffin. i havent clue one why prime in the movieverse is dedicated to protecting humanity. in the comics it was simple- the cons being here was his fault. he crashed the ark into it.
if they dont want to go the ark route fine but gives us a fecking reason thats as good as that as to what their motivation is.
its ironic that TLK looks to be the one to cause all this as even some of the critics that hate whats bays done with these films concede its not the worst of them. i guess the REAL question now is with goldsman gone and the writers room in disarray WHO is gonna get handed this reboot task?
Posted by SnoopDawg on August 3rd, 2017 @ 9:36am CDT
Windsweeper wrote:Good riddance to Goldsman. After Batman and Robin, he and Schumacher should never have been left near another movie.
Same with Bay after Revenge of the Fallen.
If they do reboot the franchise I hope they stay away from horrible designs like Frenzy, Starscream, Ironhide, Wheelie, Reedman, the Twins, Jetfire, Brains, Que, Drift, Hound and Gecko. All of whom looked like rejects from the Robots movie and not Transformers.
Alien robots shouldn't have hair, buck teeth or samurai armour.
The comics work because they treat Transformers like proper sci fi and not bloody Harry Potter.
Except Barber who focuses too much on humans and gives us crap like the droid, Garrison Blackrock and Thundercracker's dog and should also be kept away from the Transformers.
Who tf is Gecko? And besides, although I agree with you about the beards and stuff, Ironhide and Starscream are really cool designs.
Posted by william-james88 on August 3rd, 2017 @ 9:43am CDT
partholon wrote:i think things have worked out as well for the franchise as they can.
the films STILL making money, last i checked it was circa 570million worldwide so its made its production budget back so everyone gets paid.
Not really. Theatres take 50% of the revenue so that they can stay in business (they arent showing the film for free) so all the studio got back so far is at most 285 million, but more like 261 million (since its usually more like 46% that they get back). The film cost 217 million to produce but we dont know how much marketting cost. If marketting was more than 20 million, which I am sure it is, then there are still some people that havent gotten paid yet and the film might be in a deficit when all is said and done.
Posted by Sabrblade on August 3rd, 2017 @ 10:52am CDT
Meanwhile the Bay films, separate from any "GEEWUN 4eva!" criticism are:
-heavily misogynistic and filled with creepy male gaze moments (usually on young/underage girl's bodies)
-filled with blatant military propaganda for some reason
-overly crude "humor" (if it was funny I *might* strike this from the list, but it's really not. It's like gross dad humor)
-have way too many racist moments (the correct amount to have would be ZERO)
-are extremely violent in a way that is inappropriate for Hasbro's main target demographic: children
Posted by Evil Eye on August 3rd, 2017 @ 11:36am CDT
Sabrblade wrote:This is the best sum up of the films' criticisms I've seen:Meanwhile the Bay films, separate from any "GEEWUN 4eva!" criticism are:
-heavily misogynistic and filled with creepy male gaze moments (usually on young/underage girl's bodies)
-filled with blatant military propaganda for some reason
-overly crude "humor" (if it was funny I *might* strike this from the list, but it's really not. It's like gross dad humor)
-have way too many racist moments (the correct amount to have would be ZERO)
-are extremely violent in a way that is inappropriate for Hasbro's main target demographic: children
Allspark is that way.
Posted by Sabrblade on August 3rd, 2017 @ 11:48am CDT
It's still valid criticism.Black Hat wrote:Sabrblade wrote:This is the best sum up of the films' criticisms I've seen:Meanwhile the Bay films, separate from any "GEEWUN 4eva!" criticism are:
-heavily misogynistic and filled with creepy male gaze moments (usually on young/underage girl's bodies)
-filled with blatant military propaganda for some reason
-overly crude "humor" (if it was funny I *might* strike this from the list, but it's really not. It's like gross dad humor)
-have way too many racist moments (the correct amount to have would be ZERO)
-are extremely violent in a way that is inappropriate for Hasbro's main target demographic: children
Allspark is that way.
Posted by Evil Eye on August 3rd, 2017 @ 12:02pm CDT
Sabrblade wrote:It's still valid criticism.Black Hat wrote:Sabrblade wrote:This is the best sum up of the films' criticisms I've seen:Meanwhile the Bay films, separate from any "GEEWUN 4eva!" criticism are:
-heavily misogynistic and filled with creepy male gaze moments (usually on young/underage girl's bodies)
-filled with blatant military propaganda for some reason
-overly crude "humor" (if it was funny I *might* strike this from the list, but it's really not. It's like gross dad humor)
-have way too many racist moments (the correct amount to have would be ZERO)
-are extremely violent in a way that is inappropriate for Hasbro's main target demographic: children
Allspark is that way.
Debatable. TLK was unbearable dreck but most of these complaints seem like the usual offendatron "It isn't made of Tumblr humour and bitching about slavery so it's bad REEEEEEEE" twaddle one would expect from a perpetually #triggered teenaged girl who's never experienced adversity in her life.
Seriously. Considering my mother enjoyed every movie that wasn't TLK (and the reason she disliked that one was the shoddy acting, terrible storyline and Izabella, AKA the worst human sidekick the franchise has seen in a while) I'd say these "criticisms" were made by someone who doesn't understand what actual racism or misogyny are and quite frankly needs a good slap.
Seriously, let's run through these:
Misogyny: Attractive women on screen do not a misogynist movie make. No.
Military propaganda: Ech. What is with these people and the virulent hatred for the people that keep them safe?
Overly crude "humour": Hardly a complaint that can't be levelled at the vast majority of hollywood attempts at humour. Plus, at least most of the humour in the Transformers movies were at least slightly funny.
Racism: No. Not even close. The Twins' characterization was A: created by Reno Wilson (who IS black) and B: was supposed to be a pisstake of "wiggers" AKA white teens who adopt sh!tty "gangsta" culture to look cool.
Violence: Nothing outside the age rating. Not every Transformers work of fiction is aimed at the same demographic. We have IDW feeding robot spines to other robots, and those comics are regarded as some of the best fiction in the franchise.
So yeah. Get that crap outta here.