SDCC 2016: Transformers Prime 1 Studios Optimus Prime Gallery AND Video #SDCC #HasbroSDCC
Saturday, July 23rd, 2016 2:10AM CDT
Categories: Toy News, Event News, Digital Media NewsPosted by: Bronzewolf Views: 37,657
Topic Options: View Discussion · Sign in or Join to reply
Super interested in this figure? It's available now through Sideshow's website for a Prime-sized price tag.
Will you buy it? What do you think of the almost G1-Fall of Cybertron mashup design? Leave your thoughts in the comments!
News Search
Got Transformers News? Let us know here!
Most Popular Transformers News
ROTB Optimus Prime Lead Designer Discusses Why the Face Looks Similar to the 2007 Movie
56,713 viewsMost Recent Transformers News
Posted by Bronzewolf on July 24th, 2016 @ 1:51am CDT
Megatron
Optimus Prime
Nemesis Prime
Opimus Primal and Waspinator
Posted by Cyberpath on July 24th, 2016 @ 2:34am CDT
Bronzewolf wrote:Megatron
The TFW2005 images don't show up here. But I've seen him. And like with the Optimus Prime statue, this is what Megatron should have looked like in the Michael Bay movies. (And voiced by Frank Welker from the start.)
I would have never guessed that this creature was supposed to be him:
Posted by Evil Eye on July 24th, 2016 @ 7:49am CDT
Posted by Tyrannacon on July 24th, 2016 @ 8:33am CDT
Posted by Kurona on July 24th, 2016 @ 8:34am CDT
Posted by Sabrblade on July 24th, 2016 @ 11:14am CDT
But the movies aren't G1. Why is every other non-G1 Megatron allowed by the fans to have their own unique and original designs but not Movie Megatron? Or any of the Movie characters?Cyberpath wrote:this is what Megatron should have looked like in the Michael Bay movies. (And voiced by Frank Welker from the start.)
Posted by Kurona on July 24th, 2016 @ 11:21am CDT
Sabrblade wrote:But the movies aren't G1. Why is every other non-G1 Megatron allowed by the fans to have their own unique and original designs but not Movie Megatron? Or any of the Movie characters?Cyberpath wrote:this is what Megatron should have looked like in the Michael Bay movies. (And voiced by Frank Welker from the start.)
Well...
The movie was very obviously intentionally aimed at fans of G1 - notice that before the movies, every other iteration of Transformers featured entirely different settings and beyond Optimus, Megatron and Starscream a very different cast of characters. Only Energon broke this trend and even then it was mostly just references in the designs due to the anniversary. The movie went full-out G1 with it's Autobot cast - hence Ratchet, Jazz, Ironhide, Bumblebee - and was a blockbuster movie aimed at cashing in on 80s fans' nostalgia. So it's only natural that said fans would want the designs to be more reminiscent of G1 more than any other series, especially given there were a lot more viewers to this than the likes of RiD and Cybertron.
Posted by Sabrblade on July 24th, 2016 @ 11:32am CDT
Seemed more to me like it was aimed at mainstream action popcorn movie audiences unfamiliar with Transformers than anyone else.Kurona wrote:The movie was very obviously intentionally aimed at fans of G1
"Present-day Earth" was the main setting from 2001 to 2005, with "out in space" as a secondary setting during that time, and both of which the movies all take place in as well.Kurona wrote:notice that before the movies, every other iteration of Transformers featured entirely different settings
With Jazz being the only one of those four who bore any physical resemblance to his G1 counterpart, and not even in his color scheme.Kurona wrote:The movie went full-out G1 with it's Autobot cast - hence Ratchet, Jazz, Ironhide, Bumblebee
Not to mention how three of those four were barely even in the movie at all.
Let's not beat around the bush here. The real reason is cuz a lot of G1 fans wanted and still want live-action G1 movies instead of live-action non-G1 movies. They want what they grew up with to be done and be seen in a real life live-action format (nothing wrong with that) and won't accept anything new or different from that (therein lies the problem).Kurona wrote:and was a blockbuster movie aimed at cashing in on 80s fans' nostalgia. So it's only natural that said fans would want the designs to be more reminiscent of G1 more than any other series, especially given there were a lot more viewers to this than the likes of RiD and Cybertron.
Posted by Kurona on July 24th, 2016 @ 11:44am CDT
Sabrblade wrote:Seemed more to me like it was aimed at mainstream action popcorn movie audiences unfamiliar with Transformers than anyone else.Kurona wrote:The movie was very obviously intentionally aimed at fans of G1"Present-day Earth" was the main setting from 2001 to 2005, with "out in space" as a secondary setting during that time, and both of which the movies all take place in as well.Kurona wrote:notice that before the movies, every other iteration of Transformers featured entirely different settingsWith Jazz being the only one of those four who bore any physical resemblance to his G1 counterpart, and not even in his color scheme.Kurona wrote:The movie went full-out G1 with it's Autobot cast - hence Ratchet, Jazz, Ironhide, Bumblebee
Not to mention how three of those four were barely even in the movie at all.
It was most certainly aimed at general action movie audiences, yes; but we're not tackling yet - we're tackling what the Transformers part was aimed at. Because if it was just a generic action movie, you could call it anything. You could make it anything. You could just make another Die Hard movie or Bay could just make another one of his terrible movies based on real life disasters. But why was it Transformers in particular? Who are they aiming at?
Well, considering the age rating, the events of the movie and the sexualization, I'm going to assume it's not Hasbro's usual target audience. That usual target audience being, of course, kids who do not need G1 references thrown at them to buy a product. All they need is something they find cool thrown at them to buy a product. I sure as heck didn't get Energon Ultra Magnus as a kid because I thought it was a great reference to G1 Ultra Magnus in name and colour scheme, I bought it because oh my god my Armada Optimus can have massive shoulder cannons.
And most G1 fans don't really care about those new Transformers franchises that happened since they were a kid, or don't even know they exist. Some did, obviously. We're on a website full of them, but that's a very small and niche amount of people. Transformers (2007) was made as a Transformers movie rather than a generic action movie to target and cash in on a large audience who as children 30 years ago were captivated by a world-wide phenomenon. I don't like to put arguments as objective fact, but there is no debating that. You can't possibly argue that it was targeted at any other facet of the Transformers fandom.
So, if it's aimed at those fans... it's pretty natural that a lot of them would come away thinking "you know I really wish that guy calling himself Megatron actually looked like the Megatron I saw as a kid".
Admittedly, my use of the term 'setting' was a bit too broad and inaccurate. When I said it I meant more the themes and subject of the show. Armada focused on collecting mini-cons, Cybertron focused on saving the entire galaxy from a black hole, etc. The point is that they all went for something a little different than being G1-based in story.
Yeah, Jazz is the only recognisable one of the bunch. I just said they were going for a G1 cast, not that they did it particularly well.
In any case, this discussion is likely best not to take place here as it's a completely different subject. Don't want a repeat of that whole Masterpiece Energon scenario...
Posted by Cyberpath on July 24th, 2016 @ 12:08pm CDT
Sabrblade wrote:But the movies aren't G1. Why is every other non-G1 Megatron allowed by the fans to have their own unique and original designs but not Movie Megatron? Or any of the Movie characters?Cyberpath wrote:this is what Megatron should have looked like in the Michael Bay movies. (And voiced by Frank Welker from the start.)
Because when you do movies you go back to the source, to what made the franchise popular in the first place, and go from there.
Spider-Man got to look like Spider-Man.
Batman like Batman.
Superman like Superman.
And Megatron looked like a blob of metal parts with zero resemblance to the iconic character. He didn't even have his arm cannon, it's the least the the designers could have done.
Kurona -- also, they paid millions to the original voice-actor of Optimus Prime. They could have tagged a famous movie-star instead.
IMO this Prime 1 Studio got the right mix of on-model details and new "realistic" details. (for a live-action movie.)
Posted by Sabrblade on July 24th, 2016 @ 12:12pm CDT
By 2007, there were lots of sources to choose from. All those other examples you listed didn't have to keep drastically reinventing the looks of those characters every year or two to keep things fresh over the years to sell more toys. But Transformers had to do that because what made Transformers popular in the first place also nearly killed Transformers too.Cyberpath wrote:Sabrblade wrote:But the movies aren't G1. Why is every other non-G1 Megatron allowed by the fans to have their own unique and original designs but not Movie Megatron? Or any of the Movie characters?Cyberpath wrote:this is what Megatron should have looked like in the Michael Bay movies. (And voiced by Frank Welker from the start.)
Because when you do movies you go back to the source, to what made the franchise popular in the first place, and go from there.
Posted by Cyberpath on July 24th, 2016 @ 12:26pm CDT
Sabrblade wrote:By 2007, there were lots of sources to choose from. All those other examples you listed didn't have to keep drastically reinventing the looks of those characters every year or two to keep things fresh over the years to sell more toys. But Transformers had to do that because what made Transformers popular in the first place also nearly killed Transformers too.
Yes, I'm sure all these other obscure TF cartoons and toys up to 2007 were just as well-known and iconic as the originals. And that it's totally a coincidence that Hasbro is still basing its toys on "G1."
And these other franchises did change in the comics...
.. but the movie makers knew how to pick the iconic looks for them.
Posted by Sabrblade on July 24th, 2016 @ 12:30pm CDT
They were to every kid who grew up with them as much as G1 was to every kid who grew up with it, yes.Cyberpath wrote:Yes, I'm sure all the other obscure Transformers cartoons and toys up to 2007 were just as well-known and iconic as the originals.
Which only really started to take off in 2006.Cyberpath wrote:And that it's totally a coincidence that Hasbro is still basing its toys on "G1."
Every 1 to 2 years, though?Cyberpath wrote:And these other franchises did change in the comics...
Posted by Cyberpath on July 24th, 2016 @ 1:00pm CDT
Sabrblade wrote:They were to every kid who grew up with them as much as G1 was to every kid who grew up with it, yes.Cyberpath wrote:Yes, I'm sure all the other obscure Transformers cartoons and toys up to 2007 were just as well-known and iconic as the originals.
Less kids, I'm sure.
Sabrblade wrote:Which only really started to take off in 2006.Cyberpath wrote:And that it's totally a coincidence that Hasbro is still basing its toys on "G1."
Earlier than that, I think. But that's already ten years. Companies tend to go back to the original once the "flavour of the month" dries up. Even "G2" was the "G1" toys with weird decos and some new figures that could have been released in the original line.
Sabrblade wrote:Every 1 to 2 years, though?Cyberpath wrote:And these other franchises did change in the comics...
.. but the movie makers knew how to pick the iconic looks for them.
I don't know how many years apart. But they change enough to have a selection; and the movie-makers usually pick the iconic looks. Bay's Megatron wasn't close.
Even in the 2007 animated series they made sure to make Megatron instantly recognisable..
Posted by Emerje on July 24th, 2016 @ 3:11pm CDT
Cyberpath wrote:Batman like Batman
Nope, they didn't go with an iconic Batman costume for any of the movies. The iconic comic Batman costume is blue/black cowl, cape, gloves, trunks, and boots on a gray spandex body suit and yellow utility belt, but every movie from '89 to present have clad him in the drastically different all black body armor from head to toe. They've since become the expectation for the movies, but they have only the barest essentials like the ears in common with the original source. Remove the ears and the Batman logo from the chest and the '89 movie costume would not have been recognizable as Batman at the time.
Emerje
Posted by Cyberpath on July 24th, 2016 @ 4:45pm CDT
-- where someone looked at him and said.. wait, is that supposed to be... Batman...?
Never happened. Batman is instantly recognisable in all of them. They took his attributes and ran with it.
And Megatron?
If you go back, I didn't say that they should have used the original model for film; but something like the Prime 1 Studio sculptures. They stuck the perfect balance imo.
Posted by Bronzewolf on July 24th, 2016 @ 4:48pm CDT
Posted by Zeedust on July 24th, 2016 @ 5:49pm CDT
Sabrblade wrote:Let's not beat around the bush here. The real reason is cuz a lot of G1 fans wanted and still want live-action G1 movies instead of live-action non-G1 movies. They want what they grew up with to be done and be seen in a real life live-action format (nothing wrong with that) and won't accept anything new or different from that (therein lies the problem).
In other words, just another manifestation of the "TRUKK NOT MUNKY" mentality.
I will grant that the movie designs are ugly, but this has nothing to do with whether or not they resemble G1. The aesthetic is just horrible in and of itself.
Cyberpath wrote:Sabrblade wrote:Which only really started to take off in 2006.Cyberpath wrote:And that it's totally a coincidence that Hasbro is still basing its toys on "G1."
Earlier than that, I think. But that's already ten years. Companies tend to go back to the original once the "flavour of the month" dries up. Even "G2" was the "G1" toys with weird decos and some new figures that could have been released in the original line.
And look how well that did. It lasted a whole TWO YEARS before Beast Wars had to "ruin" the franchise back to viability, and if that hadn't happened there would BE no Transformers today.
And then there was Machine Wars. How did that go over, exactly?
Posted by Emerje on July 24th, 2016 @ 6:17pm CDT
Cyberpath wrote:Was there ever a "Batman" film where Batman didn't look like Batman?
-- where someone looked at him and said.. wait, is that supposed to be... Batman...?
Never happened. Batman is instantly recognisable in all of them. They took his attributes and ran with it.
Of the three you listed, Spiderman, Batman, and Superman, it's Batman who had the most drastic costume change when it came to '89 and later movies. He still doesn't dress like that in the comics because he doesn't need to. I'm not saying he's unrecognizable, just that he had a radical redesign compared to the others you named.
And the reason why he still looks vaguely the same after getting the movie treatment is because in the end he's still the same millionaire playboy Bruce Wayne who's parents were murdered and fighting crime at night. Spiderman is still student Peter Parker that was bit by a radioactive spider. Superman is still Daily Planet writer Clark Kent who is secretly an alien from the planet Krypton. It's the same characters from the comics. Movie Megatron is not G1 Megatron in any way, shape, or form, they don't share origins, they don't share stories, and therefore has no need to look like him at all. Sure, many of us would like to see G1 done as the ideal movie and that statue might fit in nicely with that, but that's not the movies we got.
Emerje
Posted by Cyberpath on July 25th, 2016 @ 12:48am CDT
Emerje wrote:Cyberpath wrote:Was there ever a "Batman" film where Batman didn't look like Batman?
-- where someone looked at him and said.. wait, is that supposed to be... Batman...?
Never happened. Batman is instantly recognisable in all of them. They took his attributes and ran with it.
Of the three you listed, Spiderman, Batman, and Superman, it's Batman who had the most drastic costume change when it came to '89 and later movies. He still doesn't dress like that in the comics because he doesn't need to. I'm not saying he's unrecognizable, just that he had a radical redesign compared to the others you named.
Like I said, they went to the source and took it from there. Megatron looks nothing like anything.
Emerje wrote:And the reason why he still looks vaguely the same after getting the movie treatment is because in the end he's still the same millionaire playboy Bruce Wayne who's parents were murdered and fighting crime at night. Spiderman is still student Peter Parker that was bit by a radioactive spider. Superman is still Daily Planet writer Clark Kent who is secretly an alien from the planet Krypton. It's the same characters from the comics. Movie Megatron is not G1 Megatron in any way, shape, or form, they don't share origins, they don't share stories, and therefore has no need to look like him at all. Sure, many of us would like to see G1 done as the ideal movie and that statue might fit in nicely with that, but that's not the movies we got.
Emerje
Oh? An alien robot transformer, from the planet Cybertron, named Megatron. Leader of the the Decepticons. Enemy of Optimus Prime. Crash-landed on Earth. Tries to revive Cybertron and conquer the world. Surrounded by Starcsream, Soundwave and Shockwave. Changed into "Galvatron." Oh yeah, where did they get all that stuff from. Come on, Emerje.
He even sat in Lincoln's throne!
They could have designed them any way they wanted, G1, Beast War or whatever. To me, they went the wrong way.
At least they wised up in AoE, and got Frank to voice him again. They also had five Autobots with distinct looks and personalities. I actually managed to tell them apart this time, imagine that! Optimus Prime's head was also better in AoE, shame they had to ruin it with a mouth.
Posted by D-Maximal_Primal on August 5th, 2016 @ 12:04pm CDT
Posted by Va'al on August 13th, 2016 @ 1:44pm CDT
Posted by Kurona on August 13th, 2016 @ 1:47pm CDT
Though as with the rest of this line... really friggin' cool designs, way too expensive. It's the sort of thing to admire and gawk at from a distance sadly
Posted by Sabrblade on August 13th, 2016 @ 1:50pm CDT
Posted by Tyrannacon on August 13th, 2016 @ 3:45pm CDT
But even if I could afford the price tag for it, I doubt I could even justify doing it myself.
Posted by Hero Alpha on August 13th, 2016 @ 5:35pm CDT
Posted by dragons on August 13th, 2016 @ 7:30pm CDT
Moonshot wrote:Way, way out of my price range. Although it looks super sweet and would be really great if the Bay movie bots looked more like this style.
stop buying toys for 9 months you to can afford this, this looks to cartoony/ comicbook style to fit into movies its what live action cartoon would look like not enough realistic look to it if bay movie bots look like this transfromer fans would go see movies and more littel kids not enough new fans would go see transfromers movies keep the bots look realistic looking as you would looking at car with moving tires it will make them more life like and less boring blocky cartton style from cartoon and comics adults dont want to watch cartoons adults want realistic looking thing,.
coworker i work with doesnt watch animated movies sausage party, dragonballz, transformers aniamted movie, finding dory if bay bots look like this in movies HE WOULD NOT go watch trasnfromers movies to this day
Posted by Kurona on August 13th, 2016 @ 7:52pm CDT
dragons wrote:Moonshot wrote:Way, way out of my price range. Although it looks super sweet and would be really great if the Bay movie bots looked more like this style.
stop buying toys for 9 months you to can afford this, this looks to cartoony/ comicbook style to fit into movies its what live action cartoon would look like not enough realistic look to it if bay movie bots look like this transfromer fans would go see movies and more littel kids not enough new fans would go see transfromers movies keep the bots look realistic looking as you would looking at car with moving tires it will make them more life like and less boring blocky cartton style from cartoon and comics adults dont want to watch cartoons adults want realistic looking thing,.
coworker i work with doesnt watch animated movies sausage party, dragonballz, transformers aniamted movie, finding dory if bay bots look like this in movies HE WOULD NOT go watch trasnfromers movies to this day
Calm down. You respond to literally any post that suggests the aesthetic of the movies is not good or to the person's taste with the exact same thing over and over. Without challenging the content of the post itself - problems as I may find with it - you're simply going to tire yourself out if you keep doing this and it's not convincing anyone. I suggest your time would be better spent talking about what you do enjoy about the movies.
... and, uh, don't use Sausage Party as an example. I know I can't speak for everyone here but it's really one of those things that's best looked over, shoved to the side and quickly forgotten.
Posted by Sabrblade on August 13th, 2016 @ 10:29pm CDT
(Even if it also looks like it has no ability to transform into an altmode of any kind, and I'm not talking about the fact that it's a non-transforming statue.)
Posted by Ultra Markus on August 13th, 2016 @ 10:52pm CDT
Sabrblade wrote:Being a statue aside, this design doesn't look like it could even transform into anything at all.
neither does the some of the movieverse designs but hey at least its a pretty cool looking design
Posted by Sabrblade on August 13th, 2016 @ 10:57pm CDT
Yeah, it's cool, but do we really need more "doesn't look like it transforms" designs to seep over to non-Movieverse designs too?Ultra Markus wrote:Sabrblade wrote:Being a statue aside, this design doesn't look like it could even transform into anything at all.
neither does the some of the movieverse designs but hey at least its a pretty cool looking design
At least give his some treads on the back of his legs or something.
Posted by fenrir72 on August 14th, 2016 @ 1:45am CDT
Posted by Hero Alpha on August 14th, 2016 @ 7:31am CDT
dragons wrote:Moonshot wrote:Way, way out of my price range. Although it looks super sweet and would be really great if the Bay movie bots looked more like this style.
stop buying toys for 9 months you to can afford this, this looks to cartoony/ comicbook style to fit into movies its what live action cartoon would look like not enough realistic look to it if bay movie bots look like this transfromer fans would go see movies and more littel kids not enough new fans would go see transfromers movies keep the bots look realistic looking as you would looking at car with moving tires it will make them more life like and less boring blocky cartton style from cartoon and comics adults dont want to watch cartoons adults want realistic looking thing,.
coworker i work with doesnt watch animated movies sausage party, dragonballz, transformers aniamted movie, finding dory if bay bots look like this in movies HE WOULD NOT go watch trasnfromers movies to this day
Just adding one of each, period and comma, at the end of a paragraph doesnt count. Makes it a little hard to read. But just wanted to say, I am 38 and those things you named are the very things I enjoy watching(except Sausage Party maybe lol), plus many of my "adult" friends do as well. We must be anomalies. This design seems like a perfect movie look to me, and it seems quite a few others. Have to agree with Saber on the jaeger thing as well.
Posted by Tyrannacon on August 14th, 2016 @ 10:16am CDT
fenrir72 wrote:If only Bay used these design concepts.............
I empathize with that a lot actually. That particular Megatron design shown here would look great if it was used for the film's itself. Though I mean I do agree with the idea of making him a jet or more specifically a tank as the gun mode is otherwise impractical now due to "safety reasons" and all that.
Posted by D-Maximal_Primal on August 19th, 2016 @ 4:01pm CDT
Posted by Sabrblade on August 19th, 2016 @ 5:13pm CDT
Which in turn seems to have been the basis for the design of RID 2015 Warrior class Optimus Prime's axe:
Posted by Richeevee on August 19th, 2016 @ 7:42pm CDT
Posted by dragons on August 19th, 2016 @ 10:23pm CDT
Moonshot wrote:dragons wrote:Moonshot wrote:Way, way out of my price range. Although it looks super sweet and would be really great if the Bay movie bots looked more like this style.
stop buying toys for 9 months you to can afford this, this looks to cartoony/ comicbook style to fit into movies its what live action cartoon would look like not enough realistic look to it if bay movie bots look like this transfromer fans would go see movies and more littel kids not enough new fans would go see transfromers movies keep the bots look realistic looking as you would looking at car with moving tires it will make them more life like and less boring blocky cartton style from cartoon and comics adults dont want to watch cartoons adults want realistic looking thing,.
coworker i work with doesnt watch animated movies sausage party, dragonballz, transformers aniamted movie, finding dory if bay bots look like this in movies HE WOULD NOT go watch trasnfromers movies to this day
Just adding one of each, period and comma, at the end of a paragraph doesnt count. Makes it a little hard to read. But just wanted to say, I am 38 and those things you named are the very things I enjoy watching(except Sausage Party maybe lol), plus many of my "adult" friends do as well. We must be anomalies. This design seems like a perfect movie look to me, and it seems quite a few others. Have to agree with Saber on the jaeger thing as well.
I'm for all for anyone there own opinion , get tired of reading about it when something new comes out that looks better than movie version from time to time, movies are making transformers more popular now than they where before movies where being made before all we got was toys,accessories , games, news now it's movie news to add to mix,. This is new time and age movie has no connection to anything same if people want to talk about bad designs energon and cybertron is another series look at for most characters iron hide , cyclonus for starters,.
People don't like movies I accept that buy how many years how many movies have we got over years and still getting same comments if bay bots look like this don't like how they look don't watch movies don't stay up to date with movies if you don't like how they look, with many humans in movies, transformers looking non human faces these bots are meant look realistic you same blocky mess with humans breathing out in space without space suits on cybertron, prime being brought back to life more than once watch generation one cartoons,.
I will admit statues look nice I'm no statue fan when it comes to transformers but for fans who do like them they can afford it stop buying and save and buy it in few months if you want it bad enough.
Posted by D-Maximal_Primal on September 5th, 2016 @ 11:52pm CDT
Posted by Va'al on September 12th, 2016 @ 4:25am CDT
“Every galaxy I’ve traveled, all you species are the same. You all think you’re the center of the universe. You have no idea.”
Sideshow and Prime 1 Studio are proud to present the latest release in the Premium Bust Collection - Lockdown from Transformers: Age of Extinction. Like any bounty hunter, Lockdown will pay top dollar to get what he wants. Answering only to his enigmatic "Creators", Lockdown holds himself above the Autobot/Decepticon war and sees both sides as squabbling children that he has to rein in personally. He doesn't think much of other civilized species across the galaxy (particularly humans), though he isn't above working with them if it suits him.
Expected to Ship
Jul 2017 - Sep 2017
License
Transformers
Scale
Bust
Manufacturer
Prime 1 Studio
Product Size
8.18" H (207.77mm) x 5.35" W (135.89mm) x 7.12" L (180.85mm)*
Tabletop View »
Dimensional Weight
TBD
Int'l Dim. Weight
TBD
Size and weight are approximate values. Learn more »
Product Sku
902844
Posted by Kurona on September 12th, 2016 @ 4:30am CDT
... that visor is really cool and impressive.
Posted by Carnivius_Prime on September 12th, 2016 @ 5:18am CDT
Posted by Microraptor on September 12th, 2016 @ 6:55am CDT
Posted by Va'al on October 17th, 2016 @ 3:51pm CDT
Posted by TulioDude on October 18th, 2016 @ 11:00am CDT
One of mine favorites designs
Posted by alternator77 on October 18th, 2016 @ 1:05pm CDT
on a side note looking at that figures detail really makes me appreciate what they pulled off with his human alliance figure.
Posted by D-Maximal_Primal on October 18th, 2016 @ 9:34pm CDT
Posted by Sabrblade on October 18th, 2016 @ 9:36pm CDT
Posted by D-Maximal_Primal on October 20th, 2016 @ 3:43pm CDT
“The boy's pheromone levels suggest he wants to mate with the female.”
Prime 1 Studio is proud to present MMTFM-13 RATCHET from Transformers film. The Autobot medic officer is probably the bravest of them all. He will risk his life to pull any wounded comrade from the battlefield. Ratchet’s who dislike violence, well-armed appearance is more due to being an improviser with surgical tools. When combat is unavoidable, he can employ these makeshift weapons with surprising agility for his size. Nonetheless, he remains one of the most genuinely kind members of the Autobots, valuing their friendship and camaraderie above all else, and would never betray their trust. He may not be the strongest Autobots, but damned if he’s not one of the most dependable.
Ratchet Statue features:
- Approximately 26 inches tall (H: 65cm, W: 50cm, D: 35cm)
- LED lights up function on head
- Limited quantity worldwide
Edition size: 750
Retail price: $1199 US
- Prototype samples shown.
- Product details could be subjected to change without further notice.
Posted by Quantum Surge on October 20th, 2016 @ 6:13pm CDT