360 Experience Clip for Transformers: The Last Knight
Saturday, June 17th, 2017 3:16PM CDT
Categories: Movie Related News, Digital Media NewsPosted by: Va'al Views: 16,585
Topic Options: View Discussion · Sign in or Join to reply
Check out this 360 look behind the scenes of #Transformers: The Last Knight, powered by #Holor. Enjoy this 360 experience on your mobile device, on desktop by mousing around to explore, or on a 3D headset, and don’t miss #Transformers when it hits theaters June 21.
News Search
Got Transformers News? Let us know here!
Most Popular Transformers News
ROTB Optimus Prime Lead Designer Discusses Why the Face Looks Similar to the 2007 Movie
58,072 viewsMost Recent Transformers News
Posted by Kurona on June 17th, 2017 @ 4:20pm CDT
Posted by Va'al on June 17th, 2017 @ 4:26pm CDT
I am more and more baffled by the type of cast going into these projects.
Posted by Optimum Supreme on June 17th, 2017 @ 4:34pm CDT
Posted by dragons on June 17th, 2017 @ 5:21pm CDT
Posted by dragons on June 17th, 2017 @ 5:24pm CDT
Posted by YoungPrime on June 17th, 2017 @ 5:41pm CDT
Posted by Rated X on June 17th, 2017 @ 6:50pm CDT
Kurona wrote:Rated X wrote:Since when do police release a statement that is humorous? And im assuming that germany has similar laws to the US banning civilians from driving a car with the words "police" on it in the streets, so I doubt these cars were driven in. They even had the hoods up for display purposes so they were obviously towed in and parked with somebody's permission to attract business. Im calling fake on the whole police report thing. The cops were probably actors and towing the cars away was a big publicity stunt. Suprised you news guys believed this was a legit auto impounding. Cmon now...
'fraid it's real. Charges are listed, laws broken are listed, etc. and there's been nothing to the contrary. If this does indeed turn out to be confirmed as a big PR stunt, we'll post an updated story to reflect that - but right now, everything's saying this is real.
Should have linked the actual facebook post though. Editing!
Im still calling BS....
Even if thats the offical Facebook page of a particular German police department, a Facebook page is not a place for police to post pictures of actual "crime" photos no matter how funny the case might seem. It would have to be treated like any other regular case to avoid a potential lawsuit. I wouldnt rely on Facebook as an official format to find public records either. Can we get a case number from an offical German public records website ? Also if German laws are anything like American laws, you can put any type of modification on a car without fear of being "confiscated" as long as you dont actually drive it. Thats where we get the term "street legal". You see non-street legal cars being towed to car shows or race tracks all the time. The cars were parked with their hoods up for display. They can be ticketed for non-moving violations but will not be towed unless it is a parking violation. Among the humorous charges mentioned in the article, being illegally parked was not mentioned. Also among the four photos posted, not one of them has a police officer and the tow truck picture conveniently doesnt show the company name. And to make it even more ovious the cars are being carefully lifted on the tow truck by a crane. Such care isnt taken when you park illegally. Thats some expensive equipment surely used to transport showcars to specific locations. Here's my take on it: Some bored cop who happens to be a TF fan started taking pictures on duty and posted a humorous story on the departments Facebook page to have some fun. Real pictures, fake news...
Posted by william-james88 on June 17th, 2017 @ 8:41pm CDT
Va'al wrote:Omar Sy is a fantastic actor.
I am more and more baffled by the type of cast going into these projects.
Whats cool about this is that it means Hot Rod's French accent will actually be real and not someone's idea of a french accent.
Posted by william-james88 on June 17th, 2017 @ 9:55pm CDT
Posted by Microraptor on June 17th, 2017 @ 11:57pm CDT
william-james88 wrote:Va'al wrote:Omar Sy is a fantastic actor.
I am more and more baffled by the type of cast going into these projects.
Whats cool about this is that it means Hot Rod's French accent will actually be real and not someone's idea of a french accent.
Drift and Dino had real accents.
Posted by Stuartmaximus on June 18th, 2017 @ 1:13am CDT
oh & btw....the movie's already out...at least anyway so far....in China
Posted by Burn on June 18th, 2017 @ 1:27am CDT
Stuartmaximus wrote:oh & btw....the movie's already out...at least anyway so far....in China
It is! Which is why we set up a spoiler thread for those who may have read spoilers and want to discuss it before the more major worldwide release.
Posted by Stuartmaximus on June 18th, 2017 @ 2:32am CDT
william-james88 wrote:China film insider has found proof that the Chinese version of the film Transformers: The Last Knight will be longer than the English version, by 2 minutes. We have the specific quote below and you can read the full article here.An official distribution notice sent to Chinese exhibitors was released online Thursday showing a running time of 150 minutes for the film — two minutes more than the 148-minute version playing in the rest of the world. It’s unclear what the extra two minutes in the Chinese version includes.
Btw wasn't the IMAX version for at least one of the films(could've been for more than one...not sure?) a couple of mins longer than the standard theatrical release?
but...meh...we'll prob see those mins turn up in the extras section of the Blu Ray anyway
Posted by Stuartmaximus on June 18th, 2017 @ 3:19am CDT
Posted by Sabrblade on June 18th, 2017 @ 7:32am CDT
Yes, for the first two movies. Though, the first movie's extra IMAX footage never got released on DVD or Blu-Ray.Stuartmaximus wrote:william-james88 wrote:China film insider has found proof that the Chinese version of the film Transformers: The Last Knight will be longer than the English version, by 2 minutes. We have the specific quote below and you can read the full article here.An official distribution notice sent to Chinese exhibitors was released online Thursday showing a running time of 150 minutes for the film — two minutes more than the 148-minute version playing in the rest of the world. It’s unclear what the extra two minutes in the Chinese version includes.
Btw wasn't the IMAX version for at least one of the films(could've been for more than one...not sure?) a couple of mins longer than the standard theatrical release?
Posted by WreckerJack on June 18th, 2017 @ 12:13pm CDT
If you enjoy the Michael Bay films, check out this fun 360 Experience clip!
Posted by Va'al on June 18th, 2017 @ 12:20pm CDT
Posted by Va'al on June 18th, 2017 @ 1:06pm CDT
video!
Posted by Optimum Supreme on June 18th, 2017 @ 2:10pm CDT
Posted by AgentK2 on June 18th, 2017 @ 3:43pm CDT
Posted by Deadput on June 18th, 2017 @ 4:19pm CDT
AgentK2 wrote:Okay, at 0:16 of TV spot #40, was that Onslaught they just decapitated?
Yes it is and it would explain why it seems that only Nitro and Megatron are at the final battle
Posted by D-Maximal_Primal on June 18th, 2017 @ 6:27pm CDT
Posted by Cammason8 on June 18th, 2017 @ 8:57pm CDT
Posted by PrymeStriker on June 18th, 2017 @ 9:45pm CDT
...The f*ck are they talking about?! There's three more damn movies ahead of us!
Posted by william-james88 on June 18th, 2017 @ 9:58pm CDT
Enjoy!
Posted by Kurona on June 18th, 2017 @ 9:58pm CDT
PrymeStriker wrote:"The Final Chapter"
...The f*ck are they talking about?! There's three more damn movies ahead of us!
I think it's being billed that way because it's Bay's last movie.
... is what I'd say if I wasn't cynical as heck and they just want it to sound EVEN MORE EPIC AND IMPORTANT
Posted by TurboMMaster on June 19th, 2017 @ 5:23am CDT
Right now, I'm waiting for another "Michael Bay changed his mind" news. I wonder what can it be this time
After 10 years, Transformers without Micheal Bay sounds almost too good to be true. Even if we are watining for a better director since before first movie was relased.
Posted by william-james88 on June 19th, 2017 @ 8:17am CDT
TurboMMaster wrote:After 10 years, Transformers without Micheal Bay sounds almost too good to be true. Even if we are watining for a better director since before first movie was relased.
Well the next film is being made by the director of an Oscar nominated film so you are getting your wish.
Posted by TurboMMaster on June 19th, 2017 @ 9:04am CDT
Posted by dragons on June 19th, 2017 @ 9:07am CDT
Posted by william-james88 on June 19th, 2017 @ 9:13am CDT
TurboMMaster wrote:Well, Bumblebee's spin-off isn't technically a main "Transformers" movie, so there is a risk, that until Transformers 2019, Michael Bay will decide to return, or that they decide to hire Jonathan Liebesman or someone similiar, so so movie would remain essentialy the same.
Would you rather Zack Snyder?
Posted by Sabrblade on June 19th, 2017 @ 9:40am CDT
Or Uwe Boll?william-james88 wrote:TurboMMaster wrote:Well, Bumblebee's spin-off isn't technically a main "Transformers" movie, so there is a risk, that until Transformers 2019, Michael Bay will decide to return, or that they decide to hire Jonathan Liebesman or someone similiar, so so movie would remain essentialy the same.
Would you rather Zack Snyder?
Posted by Rodimus Prime on June 19th, 2017 @ 9:47am CDT
HELL NO! And I wouldn't want J.J. Abrams, Joss Whedon, or any other overrated self-important d-bag. Bring on someone who actually does science fiction for science fiction, not to try to simply achieve nerdgasms on screen. Too bad James Cameron is busy with the Avatar sequels. What is Ridley Scott doing? He's done with Alien and Blade Runner by now. Is he starting another Alien prequel so soon?william-james88 wrote:TurboMMaster wrote:Well, Bumblebee's spin-off isn't technically a main "Transformers" movie, so there is a risk, that until Transformers 2019, Michael Bay will decide to return, or that they decide to hire Jonathan Liebesman or someone similiar, so so movie would remain essentialy the same.
Would you rather Zack Snyder?
Posted by Sabrblade on June 19th, 2017 @ 9:56am CDT
Brad Bird is a good choice for rich characterization.Rodimus Prime wrote:HELL NO! And I wouldn't want J.J. Abrams, Joss Whedon, or any other overrated self-important d-bag. Bring on someone who actually does science fiction for science fiction, not to try to simply achieve nerdgasms on screen. Too bad James Cameron is busy with the Avatar sequels. What is Ridley Scott doing? He's done with Alien and Blade Runner by now. Is he starting another Alien prequel so soon?william-james88 wrote:TurboMMaster wrote:Well, Bumblebee's spin-off isn't technically a main "Transformers" movie, so there is a risk, that until Transformers 2019, Michael Bay will decide to return, or that they decide to hire Jonathan Liebesman or someone similiar, so so movie would remain essentialy the same.
Would you rather Zack Snyder?
Or if we wanted another director who specializes in stunning visuals (but coupled with an air of sophistication), Kenneth Branagh.
Posted by william-james88 on June 19th, 2017 @ 10:24am CDT
Sabrblade wrote:Or if we wanted another director who specializes in stunning visuals (but coupled with an air of sophistication), Kenneth Branagh.
While I would be all for that, something tells me he wouldnt do it unless he was Optimus prime
Posted by TurboMMaster on June 19th, 2017 @ 11:12am CDT
I agree, Transformers deserves someone who actually could understand a genre he used to direct.Bring on someone who actually does science fiction for science fiction, not to try to simply achieve nerdgasms on screen.
Posted by Stuartmaximus on June 19th, 2017 @ 11:37am CDT
Posted by Kurona on June 19th, 2017 @ 11:42am CDT
Stuartmaximus wrote:get Patty Jenkins to make an Arcee movie
That... could work. Considering Wonder Woman is the first good DC movie in a while, she seems to have a thing for fixing long-running movie franchises based on other media
(I only meant to put one emoji but when I clicked on it for some reason it spawned eleven of the things. I'm just gonna leave it like that )
Posted by frogbat on June 19th, 2017 @ 11:50am CDT
Stuartmaximus wrote:get Patty Jenkins to make an Arcee movie
personally i reckon she should do a TF reboot movie - female led or not.
to be fair to michael bay, the first film was enjoyable and i think the FX work really did bring the concept to life. Unfortunately the franchise fell into a bigger faster more and more cycle that used to be a cliche in hollywood. Sequels have improved over the last decade and franchises have become enjoyable but not all are equal... For every Guardians of the Galaxy 2 there's Pirates...
I'd like a director who understands geek movies better - how characterisation, story and lore are all huge parts of the experience and not only action sequences.
I'll go and watch the last knight at the cinema with an open mind but low expectations. I'm very interested in watching a properly shot 3d movie and not one done in post... and if all else fails, hopefully Freya has some good screen time.
Posted by william-james88 on June 19th, 2017 @ 3:25pm CDT
Posted by william-james88 on June 19th, 2017 @ 3:33pm CDT
Plus, its hard to take his word for anything when he says Megatron is always sidelined by a more humanoid looking character and yet he shows Megatron as one of those humanoid looking characters. This is a nonsense review and it wasnt any fun to watch. I too could comment over trailers and just say what I am seeing.
Posted by Kurona on June 19th, 2017 @ 4:15pm CDT
william-james88 wrote:I will share this video review of the movie which has no spoilers for the obvious reason that Nostalgia Critic chose to review it without even seeing it. I would be all for a video about predictions, but this one is beyond lame, not even an attempt at making a fun joke.
Plus, its hard to take his word for anything when he says Megatron is always sidelined by a more humanoid looking character and yet he shows Megatron as one of those humanoid looking characters. This is a nonsense review and it wasnt any fun to watch. I too could comment over trailers and just say what I am seeing.
I kinda think you missed the entire point of the video - like he said, it's more an experiment and a spin on his tradition of reviewing the live-action movies since he's tired of reviewing them. Heck, you're proving his point by saying he's just describing the trailers - because his point is that this movie is likely going to be the exact same thing as the last movies. The entire video describes what happened in the other four movies, with the only specific details being Walberg and Knights - which you could switch out respectively with LaBeouf and Dinosaurs/Ancient pyramids/whatever. And I wouldn't call it nonsense for just a single little detail that in all likelihood is just a mistake - if you're resorting to nitpicks when the rest of the video is sound and accurate, that sounds like you've got a pretty weak argument. Everything he's saying is correct, so why do you dismiss the entire argument because of one single picture?
And I've gotta say... yeah, I completely agree with the video. I was thinking of linking it since it's my exact thoughts -- the movies are all basically the same thing with only tiny details or superficial layers switched out. The video is a commentary on the current Hollywood structure and how movie franchises - including and in specific reference to Transformers - continue to be put out despite little to no effort and thought being put into them and providing nothing substantial that hasn't been seen in the first one.
And for what it's worth I thought it was pretty damn funny - Nostalgia Critic's whole deal is over-exaggeration of emotional reactions and describing things in a ridiculous and sarcastic manner. If it's not your thing, fine; but don't say it didn't attempt humour just because the jokes didn't land with you. I got a hell of a lot more entertainment out of this than anything in the movies, I'll say that much.
I'm also not really sure why you're linking a video just to say you didn't like it. If you're at least just linking it to say you disagree with it or there's something brought up you want to discuss, fine; but if you do believe the video is pointless and provides no useless commentary, then what on earth is the point of bringing it up here and ranting about it? I could do that with anything; I could find some random person who doesn't like IDW's Till All Are One and say that what they said is pointless on TAAO's thread, but what would be the point if they didn't bring up anything that I feel could contribute to the discussion?
Posted by Burn on June 19th, 2017 @ 4:23pm CDT
Honestly, I think Bay has done a tremendous job and I had a gutful of the Bay bashing years ago. I've seen some piss and moan for years about Bay, completely over-looking the fact there are writers involved (who I feel are more to blame) but that didn't matter, they had to hate Bay.
I truly hope they do throw more money at Bay to bring him back, just to piss off the whiny fan boys even more.
But even if he doesn't come back, Bay may go away, unfortunately we'll be stuck with whiny fan boys because nothing will please them.
And at the end of the day, piss and moan about Bay, piss and moan about the movies ... you're still going to watch them.
Posted by Kurona on June 19th, 2017 @ 4:36pm CDT
So... yeah, a new director WOULD be fantastic to me. Even if they fall into the same trap as Bay and repeat cliches over and over and over in the subsequent sequels, at the very least we'd get something new and refreshing the first time round. If Bay doesn't go back on what he said and there is in fact a new director for TF7, I might be enticed to see it and would probably be more excited for it than any previous live-action Transformers movie. Heck, the Bumblebee movie is looking infinitely more promising due to the Kubo director coming in and the movie -allegedly- going for a different direction (something I don't particularly trust, but hopefully I'm proven wrong and we will get something new and awesome).
Also I know it wasn't aimed at me personally; but I'm actually not seeing TLK. The last one I saw in cinemas was Revenge of the Fallen; I only got to see Dark of the Moon and Age of Extinction because it turned out they were on Netflix and that day I just really felt like inflicting pain upon my retinas. ... The plural IS 'retinas', right? It's not really a word I use a plural for a lot. Could've just said 'eyes', but that would just be lame...
Posted by Deadput on June 19th, 2017 @ 4:50pm CDT
PrymeStriker wrote:"The Final Chapter"
...The f*ck are they talking about?! There's three more damn movies ahead of us!
To be fair two of them are prequels (Transformers one is an Animated prequel set on Cybertron presumably during the war, and the Bee movie takes place in 1985)
Posted by Deadput on June 19th, 2017 @ 4:56pm CDT
Heck it was his idea to take two different movies and combine them into one making The last Knight which is probably why it's over complicated.
In my opinion he needs to leave more so then Bay or any of the writers.
Edit: Also doing some digging and it seems that he treats Peter Cullen like crap and never wanted him in the film to the point he attempted to sabotage his audition and apparently refused to let Peter voice both Optimus and Ironhide.
Posted by Deadput on June 19th, 2017 @ 5:01pm CDT
william-james88 wrote:I will share this video review of the movie which has no spoilers for the obvious reason that Nostalgia Critic chose to review it without even seeing it. I would be all for a video about predictions, but this one is beyond lame, not even an attempt at making a fun joke.
Plus, its hard to take his word for anything when he says Megatron is always sidelined by a more humanoid looking character and yet he shows Megatron as one of those humanoid looking characters. This is a nonsense review and it wasnt any fun to watch. I too could comment over trailers and just say what I am seeing.
Ugh I don't take anything Doug says seriously in regards to these films because he thinks that the people who enjoy the movies are morons and he belittles them too at any opportunity, also he keeps whining about them and constantly brings the movies up in unrelated reviews which is part of what made me stop watching his content in the first place.
Also his screaming schtick is annoying and old.
He is also a major hypocrite since his whole TMNT review basically was him saying "things change from the source material" and yet he doesn't think the same for the Transformers movies.
Then again this video only exists because he is falling out of relevancy and is doing everything to keep his channel alive.
Posted by william-james88 on June 19th, 2017 @ 6:02pm CDT
Kurona wrote:I kinda think you missed the entire point of the video - like he said, it's more an experiment and a spin on his tradition of reviewing the live-action movies since he's tired of reviewing them. Heck, you're proving his point by saying he's just describing the trailers - because his point is that this movie is likely going to be the exact same thing as the last movies.
Sure but I want to be entertained when I watch this guy`s videos. This wasnt entertaining in the least. And there werent predictions. I wanted a full on prediction for his experiment to work but I didnt get anything substantial. As I said, I could do the same, and so could you, there was nothing fun or interesting here about his experiment.
Posted by Kurona on June 19th, 2017 @ 6:27pm CDT
william-james88 wrote:Kurona wrote:I kinda think you missed the entire point of the video - like he said, it's more an experiment and a spin on his tradition of reviewing the live-action movies since he's tired of reviewing them. Heck, you're proving his point by saying he's just describing the trailers - because his point is that this movie is likely going to be the exact same thing as the last movies.
Sure but I want to be entertained when I watch this guy`s videos. This wasnt entertaining in the least. And there werent predictions. I wanted a full on prediction for his experiment to work but I didnt get anything substantial. As I said, I could do the same, and so could you, there was nothing fun or interesting here about his experiment.
But it was a prediction. His entire point is that with the precedence of how lazy and repetitive the previous movies were, you can easily predict what's going to happen aside from inconsequential details and superficial layers. How is it not a prediction? And personally I thought it was rather entertaining. The way he done it fit his style of humour and satire completely and it worked.
Though once again... I'm really not sure why it's being brought up here when it's not being used to say anything about the topic. It seems more like something that merits its own thread.